Statistics of The Test To End All Tests

© Paul Cooijmans

Scores on The Test To End All Tests as of 21 October 2024

Contents type: Verbal.   Period: 1997-present

0 *****
1 *
2 ***
4 *
5 **
6 ***
7 **
8 ******
10 **********
11 ****
12 *****
13 ********
14 *****
15 *****
16 **
17 ***
18 *******
19 ****
20 **
21 *
22 *
23 *
24 *
25 *
26 *

Correlation of The Test To End All Tests with other mental ability tests

Test name n r
Graduate Record Examination (prior to October 2001)40.99
Narcissus' last stand360.94
Tests by Nikolaos Soulios (aggregate)60.92
Verbal section of The Marathon Test180.90
The Marathon Test180.89
Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test200.89
The Smell Test90.88
Associative LIMIT260.88
Only idiots90.87
The Gate40.86
Divine Psychometry (Matthew Scillitani)120.86
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4220.85
Numerical section of The Marathon Test210.85
Spatial section of The Marathon Test200.84
Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve)90.83
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004270.83
A Relaxing Test (David Miller)130.82
Test For Genius - Revision 2016240.82
Random Feickery (Brandon Feick)70.81
A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude240.80
The Final Test360.79
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5290.79
Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test300.78
Test For Genius - Revision 2010100.78
Spatial Insight Test50.78
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011220.78
Cooijmans Intelligence Test 5200.78
The Sargasso Test300.77
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3290.77
Test of the Beheaded Man260.77
Test For Genius - Revision 2004210.77
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2016240.77
The Bonsai Test - Revision 2016240.77
The Piper's Test150.76
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008290.75
Reflections In Peroxide360.73
Psychometric Qrosswords170.73
Cartoons of Shock170.73
Dicing with death150.72
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice70.72
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2016240.72
Genius Association Test320.71
Space, Time, and Hyperspace - Revision 2016250.70
Mega Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin)100.68
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the first degree120.68
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2010130.67
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the third degree270.67
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Paul Cooijmans)90.67
Miller Analogies Test (before 2001; raw)40.65
Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004280.65
Sigma Test (Melão Hindemburg)50.64
Tests by Jason Betts (aggregate)50.63
Analogies of Long Test For Genius160.63
International High IQ Society tests (aggregate)120.62
Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström)60.62
The Nemesis Test280.62
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 180.61
Long Test For Genius120.61
De Laatste Test - Herziening 201960.60
Reason - Revision 2008290.60
Tests by Greg Grove (aggregate)70.60
Labyrinthine LIMIT130.58
Ultra Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin)70.58
Scholastic Aptitude Test (old)50.57
Psychometrically Activated Grids Acerbate Neuroticism130.57
Laaglandse Aanlegtest - Herziening 201640.57
Short Test For Genius70.56
Titan Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin)110.56
Epiq Tests (aggregate)50.55
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2130.55
The Final Test - Revision 201390.54
Cooijmans On-Line Test - Two-barrelled version140.52
Space, Time, and Hyperspace170.51
Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010310.50
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #250.50
Letters80.50
Test of Shock and Awe100.48
The Hammer Of Test-Hungry - Revision 201380.47
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree160.46
Miscellaneous tests280.45
Association subtest of Long Test For Genius150.43
Analogies #1100.43
Isis Test280.39
Strict Logic Sequences Exam I (Jonathan Wai)110.39
The Alchemist Test (Anas El Husseini)130.38
The LAW - Letters And Words70.33
European I.Q. Test50.30
Numbers130.30
Daedalus Test180.26
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4160.26
De Golfstroomtest - Herziening 201950.24
Strict Logic Sequences Exam II (Jonathan Wai)50.23
Reason100.22
Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato)100.19
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales90.18
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.)50.16
Bonsai Test90.16
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #190.12
Tests by Ivan Ivec (aggregate)80.11
Words8-0.06
Hoeflin Power Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin)4-0.13
Cattell Culture Fair4-0.21
Tests by James Dorsey (aggregate)4-0.40
Odds6-0.44
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (raw)6-0.49
Tests by Mislav Predavec (aggregate)5-0.51
Gliaweb Raadselachtig Analogieënproefwerk4-0.88

Weighted average of correlations: 0.634 (N = 1560)

Estimated g factor loading: 0.80

Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.

Estimated loadings of The Test To End All Tests on particular item types

These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.

Typeng loading of The Test To End All Tests on that type
Verbal3030.79
Numerical820.69
Spatial1250.84
Logical570.65
Heterogeneous5850.82

N = 1152

Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.

Balanced g loading = 0.76

National medians for The Test To End All Tests

Country n median score
United_Kingdom417.5
Germany615.5
Sweden314.0
United_States3113.0
Canada411.0
Italy311.0
Netherlands311.0
Finland38.0

For reasons of privacy, only countries with 3 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the medians, and then alphabetic.

Correlation with national I.Q.'s of The Test To End All Tests

Correlation of this test with national average I.Q.'s published by Lynn and Vanhanen, later Lynn and Becker:

Correlation of The Test To End All Tests with personal details

Personalia n r
PSIA Rational - Revision 2007160.62
PSIA Orderly - Revision 2007160.59
PSIA True - Revision 2007160.56
PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 2007160.47
PSIA System factor - Revision 2007160.43
Observed associative horizon120.35
PSIA Just - Revision 2007160.29
PSIA Introverted - Revision 2007160.28
PSIA Extreme - Revision 2007160.26
PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 2007160.26
PSIA Cold - Revision 2007160.25
Sex840.16
Observed behaviour220.16
Educational level650.15
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms240.15
PSIA Rare - Revision 2007160.14
PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 2007160.11
PSIA Neurotic - Revision 2007160.06
Year of birth81-0.00
Mother's educational level60-0.01
Disorders (parents and siblings)63-0.09
Father's educational level59-0.15
Disorders (own)66-0.16
PSIA Cruel - Revision 200716-0.19
Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes9-0.40
PSIA Antisocial - Revision 200716-0.47

Estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges

In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for these values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.

Below 1st quartile (raw 8.0)0.82 (312)
Below median (raw 12.5)0.74 (691)
Above median (raw 12.5)0.64 (829)
Above 3rd quartile (raw 17.0)0.67 (517)

Reliability

Error

Scores by age

Age class n Median score
60 to 6417.0
55 to 59113.0
50 to 5449.0
45 to 49912.0
40 to 441118.0
35 to 391111.0
30 to 34913.0
25 to 291612.5
22 to 241312.0
20 or 21414.5
18 or 19110.0
17110.0
16114.0

N = 82

Scores by year taken

Year taken n median scoreprotonorm
199735.0303
199827.0330
200029.0360
2001413.5422
2002513.0413
2003513.0413
20041310.0370
2005415.5443
200630.0213
2007314.0430
2008420.0559
2009110.0370
201047.0330
2011113.0413
2012120.0559
201342.5287
2014110.0370
201616.0311
2017416.5452
2019119.0520
2020511.0387
2021413.5422
2022521.0583
2023215.0437
2024211.5391

ryear taken × median score = 0.34 (N = 84)

Robustness and overall test quality

Item analysis

Item statistics are not published as that would help candidates. To detect bad items, answers and comments from candidates are studied, as well as, for each problem, the correlation with total score on the remaining problems (item-rest correlation) and the proportion of candidates getting it wrong (hardness of the item). Possible bad items are revised, replaced, or removed, possibly resulting in a revised version of the test.