0 | ** |
9 | * |
12 | * |
14 | * |
18 | ** |
19 | ** |
20 | * |
21 | * |
22 | * |
25 | * |
26 | ** |
27 | * |
29 | ** |
30 | * |
31 | ** |
32 | * |
32.5 | * |
33 | ** |
34 | * |
35 | ** |
36 | **** |
37 | *** |
38 | ** |
39 | ** |
40 | ** |
41 | * |
42 | ** |
43 | ** |
45 | *** |
46 | *** |
47 | *** |
48 | ***** |
49 | **** |
50 | ** |
51 | * |
52 | * |
53 | * |
54 | * |
56 | * |
61 | ** |
62 | ** |
63 | * |
65 | * |
66 | * |
67 | * |
72 | * |
73 | * |
Test name | n | r |
---|---|---|
European I.Q. Test | 5 | 0.98 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 | 5 | 0.97 |
Association and Analogies (German) | 4 | 0.97 |
Epiq Tests (aggregate) | 7 | 0.95 |
Reflections In Peroxide | 7 | 0.93 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3 | 17 | 0.91 |
Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 81 | 0.91 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 22 | 0.90 |
Narcissus' last stand | 7 | 0.90 |
Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 7 | 0.89 |
Long Test For Genius | 14 | 0.89 |
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 6 | 0.89 |
Numerical section of The Marathon Test | 10 | 0.88 |
Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 6 | 0.87 |
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the third degree | 9 | 0.86 |
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the first degree | 6 | 0.84 |
Associative LIMIT | 19 | 0.83 |
Psychometric Qrosswords | 8 | 0.82 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test 5 | 8 | 0.81 |
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.) | 6 | 0.81 |
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 81 | 0.81 |
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011 | 5 | 0.81 |
Test of the Beheaded Man | 13 | 0.81 |
Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve) | 14 | 0.80 |
The Bonsai Test - Revision 2016 | 7 | 0.79 |
The Marathon Test | 8 | 0.79 |
The Final Test - Revision 2013 | 6 | 0.79 |
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 7 | 0.78 |
Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test | 10 | 0.78 |
Association subtest of Long Test For Genius | 15 | 0.78 |
The Hammer Of Test-Hungry - Revision 2013 | 6 | 0.78 |
Cartoons of Shock | 17 | 0.77 |
The Test To End All Tests | 21 | 0.77 |
Space, Time, and Hyperspace - Revision 2016 | 6 | 0.75 |
Titan Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 11 | 0.75 |
Cooijmans On-Line Test - Two-barrelled version | 8 | 0.74 |
The Nemesis Test | 11 | 0.73 |
Psychometrically Activated Grids Acerbate Neuroticism | 4 | 0.71 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5 | 18 | 0.71 |
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 6 | 0.71 |
The Final Test | 22 | 0.70 |
Sigma Test (Melão Hindemburg) | 6 | 0.70 |
Analogies of Long Test For Genius | 15 | 0.70 |
Space, Time, and Hyperspace | 19 | 0.70 |
Scholastic Aptitude Test (old) | 4 | 0.69 |
Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 30 | 0.67 |
A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude | 9 | 0.67 |
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008 | 18 | 0.67 |
Strict Logic Sequences Exam I (Jonathan Wai) | 20 | 0.67 |
Spatial section of The Marathon Test | 10 | 0.65 |
Genius Association Test | 28 | 0.63 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 30 | 0.63 |
Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 11 | 0.59 |
Reason - Revision 2008 | 18 | 0.58 |
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice | 18 | 0.57 |
Unknown and miscellaneous tests | 32 | 0.55 |
Isis Test | 17 | 0.54 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4 | 8 | 0.54 |
Tests by Mislav Predavec (aggregate) | 5 | 0.54 |
Qoymans Automatic Test #3 | 4 | 0.54 |
Letters | 4 | 0.53 |
Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström) | 14 | 0.52 |
The Sargasso Test | 17 | 0.51 |
Logima Strictica 24 (Robert Lato) | 5 | 0.50 |
Verbal section of The Marathon Test | 9 | 0.46 |
916 Test (Laurent Dubois) | 8 | 0.45 |
Numbers | 13 | 0.43 |
Test of Shock and Awe | 9 | 0.42 |
Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato) | 14 | 0.40 |
Reason | 20 | 0.37 |
Bonsai Test | 10 | 0.36 |
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version) | 7 | 0.34 |
International High IQ Society tests (aggregate) | 11 | 0.34 |
Concep-T (Laurent Dubois) | 4 | 0.32 |
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree | 9 | 0.31 |
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales | 9 | 0.31 |
KIT Intelligence Test - first attempts | 7 | 0.27 |
Test of Inductive Reasoning / J.C.T.I. (Xavier Jouve) | 7 | 0.26 |
Odds | 9 | 0.23 |
Strict Logic Spatial Exam 48 (Jonathan Wai) | 10 | 0.20 |
Spatial Insight Test | 8 | 0.17 |
Cooijmans On-Line Test | 5 | 0.09 |
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (raw) | 7 | 0.03 |
Strict Logic Sequences Exam II (Jonathan Wai) | 7 | -0.02 |
Tests by Greg Grove (aggregate) | 15 | -0.05 |
Cattell Culture Fair | 6 | -0.07 |
Daedalus Test | 7 | -0.27 |
G-test (Nikos Lygeros) | 4 | -0.34 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #1 | 4 | -0.66 |
Labyrinthine LIMIT | 4 | -0.73 |
Words | 5 | -0.77 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.631 (N = 1120)
Estimated g factor loading: 0.79
These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.
Type | n | g loading of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 on that type |
---|---|---|
Verbal | 281 | 0.83 |
Numerical | 63 | 0.76 |
Spatial | 169 | 0.86 |
Logical | 57 | 0.57 |
Heterogeneous | 267 | 0.82 |
N = 837
Balanced g loading = 0.77
Country | n | median score |
---|---|---|
Germany | 3 | 63.0 |
Canada | 3 | 49.0 |
Norway | 3 | 47.0 |
United_States | 20 | 42.0 |
Australia | 4 | 39.5 |
United_Kingdom | 7 | 39.0 |
Greece | 4 | 38.0 |
Sweden | 5 | 37.0 |
Finland | 6 | 32.0 |
Correlation of this test with national average I.Q.'s published by Lynn and Vanhanen:
Personalia | n | r |
---|---|---|
PSIA Rare - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.70 |
PSIA Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.51 |
Observed associative horizon | 8 | 0.43 |
PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.29 |
Sex | 81 | 0.29 |
PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.29 |
Educational level | 77 | 0.22 |
PSIA Rational - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.21 |
PSIA Introverted - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.19 |
PSIA Extreme - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.15 |
Mother's educational level | 76 | 0.14 |
Father's educational level | 76 | 0.14 |
PSIA Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.11 |
Observed behaviour | 21 | 0.11 |
PSIA Orderly - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.10 |
Year of birth | 81 | 0.08 |
PSIA Cruel - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.03 |
PSIA Cold - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.01 |
Disorders (own) | 78 | -0.02 |
PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 6 | -0.05 |
PSIA True - Revision 2007 | 6 | -0.06 |
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 20 | -0.14 |
PSIA System factor - Revision 2007 | 6 | -0.14 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 76 | -0.24 |
PSIA Just - Revision 2007 | 6 | -0.55 |
Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes | 5 | -0.61 |
In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for these values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.
Below 1st quartile | 0.64 (267) |
---|---|
Below median | 0.72 (506) |
Above median | 0.63 (575) |
Above 3rd quartile | 0.65 (282) |
Computed from the subtest reliabilities using a form of the Spearman-Brown formula, taking into account a weight of 2 for the spatial section.
The correlation of a subtest with itself is the reliability coefficient for that subtest.
Verbal | Spatial | |
---|---|---|
Verbal | 0.88 | 0.49 |
Spatial | 0.49 | 0.85 |
Subtest | Loading |
---|---|
Verbal | 0.83 |
Spatial | 0.81 |
Proportion of total score variance accounted for by this factor: 0.68
For statistics on subtest level, see the statistical reports for Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 and Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004.