Statistics of The Sargasso Test

© Paul Cooijmans

Norms as of 29 April 2022

RawProtonormI.Q. or Standard score
012 or lower82 or lower
14587
27391
39694
411497
512799
6140101
7153103
8165104
9177106
10189108
11201109
12213111
13225113
14237115
15249116
16259118
17264119
18268119
19272120
20276120
21278121
22280121
23282121
24293123
25300124
26307125
27314126
28327128
29340130
30367134
31381136
32386137
33389137
34398139
35413141
36433144
37460149
38489153
39498154
40508155
41546161
42595167
43614169
44633172
45652176
46671179
47684181
48697184
49710186
50723188
51736190
52749192
53762194
54775196
55788198
56801200
57814202
58827204
59840206
60853208
61866210
62884213
63916217
64997230
651130250

Norms are obtained by anchoring the object test to those of the other tests that equal or exceed a threshold correlation with the object test. The threshold is set to maximize the quality of norms. All of the scores on thus selected tests are used, each score forming a pair with a raw score on the object test, so that there are more pairs than initial raw scores. Where needed, the scores from the other tests are converted to protonorms using a relevant conversion formula or table. The raw scores on the object test, which form pairs with the used scores, are equated to the used scores with the above indicated method, and where needed there is interpolation or extrapolation. Non-extrapolated floor scores are normed at the median of their range after equating but reported as Below the measured range of the test; in case of a single outlying non-extrapolated floor score, it is normed low in its range after equating. Possible non-extrapolated ceiling scores are normed at the median of their range after equating when rare, but are normed at the bottom of their range after equating when abundant (ceiling effect); in case of a single outlying non-extrapolated ceiling score, it is normed high in its range after equating.

Scores on The Sargasso Test as of 30 April 2022

Contents type: Verbal, numerical, spatial, logical.   Period: 2007-present

7 *
16 *
20 *
23 *
25 **
26 **
27 *
28 ***
29 *****
29.5 *
30 *******
31 ***
32 *
33 ****
34 ***
35 **
35.5 ***
36 ***
36.5 *
37 ****
38 ***
39 ****
40 *
40.5 *
41 *
42 ****
46 *

Correlation of The Sargasso Test with other tests by I.Q. Tests for the High Range

(Test index) Test name n r
(55) Spatial Insight Test40.98
(54) Test of Shock and Awe60.89
(21) Psychometric Qrosswords110.80
(30) Verbal section of The Marathon Test190.78
(20) De Golfstroomtest - Herziening 201940.76
(48) Narcissus' last stand160.75
(118) Divine Psychometry70.75
(57) Space, Time, and Hyperspace60.75
(113) The Piper's Test120.74
(42) The Marathon Test160.74
(28) The Test To End All Tests230.74
(108) Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2016160.72
(7) The Final Test160.71
(106) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4270.69
(114) Dicing with death100.69
(0) Test of the Beheaded Man260.68
(33) Problems In Gentle Slopes of the first degree120.67
(87) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2110.67
(36) Reflections In Peroxide200.65
(44) Associative LIMIT290.64
(111) Test For Genius - Revision 2016160.64
(31) Numerical section of The Marathon Test190.63
(23) Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011240.63
(3) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5340.63
(83) KIT Intelligence Test - first attempts40.62
(32) Spatial section of The Marathon Test190.62
(45) Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test180.61
(37) Problems In Gentle Slopes of the third degree240.60
(43) Test For Genius - Revision 2010110.60
(109) The Bonsai Test - Revision 2016290.59
(35) Intelligence Quantifier by assessment210.59
(18) The Nemesis Test200.57
(10) Genius Association Test320.57
(2) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3330.56
(80) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4160.55
(26) Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004230.54
(107) The Alchemist Test110.54
(4) A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude220.53
(41) The LAW - Letters And Words60.52
(47) Psychometrically Activated Grids Acerbate Neuroticism110.50
(66) Test For Genius - Revision 2004160.50
(40) Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008340.50
(29) Words60.49
(112) Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2016190.49
(24) Reason - Revision 2008340.48
(1) Cartoons of Shock220.47
(16) Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test310.46
(105) Space, Time, and Hyperspace - Revision 2016190.45
(15) Letters70.40
(27) Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004240.39
(11) Isis Test230.38
(19) Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010270.38
(110) Cooijmans Intelligence Test 5200.34
(53) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #360.34
(79) Association subtest of Long Test For Genius40.30
(12) Cooijmans On-Line Test - Two-barrelled version150.29
(103) Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree180.27
(39) Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2010130.25
(82) Reason80.24
(75) Analogies of Long Test For Genius40.23
(68) Numbers110.22
(84) Bonsai Test60.21
(5) Daedalus Test120.18
(116) Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version)40.16
(62) Reason Behind Multiple-Choice70.15
(104) The Final Test - Revision 2013110.11
(117) The Hammer Of Test-Hungry - Revision 2013100.10
(69) Odds50.03

Weighted average of correlations: 0.538 (N = 1100, weighted sum = 591.84)

Conservatively estimated minimum g loading: 0.73

Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.

Correlation of The Sargasso Test with tests by others

(Test index) Test name n r
(240) Strict Logic Spatial Exam 4840.96
(212) Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (raw)40.93
(236) International High IQ Society Miscellaneous tests40.91
(211) Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version60.87
(235) Nonverbal Cognitive Performance Examination40.79
(223) Strict Logic Sequences Exam II50.65
(239) Titan Test70.60
(201) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales100.25
(242) Unknown and miscellaneous tests340.24
(225) Logima Strictica 36100.13
(234) Strict Logic Sequences Exam I8-0.02
(220) Cattell Culture Fair6-0.29
(231) Mysterium Entrance Exam6-0.47

Weighted average of correlations: 0.318 (N = 108, weighted sum = 34.31)

Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.

Please be aware that correlations with these external tests are in most cases affected (depressed, typically) by one or more of the following: (1) Little overlap with the object test because of the much lower ceilings and inherent ceiling effects of the tests used in regular psychology; (2) Candidates reporting scores selectively, for instance only the higher ones while withholding lower ones; (3) Candidates reporting, or having been reported by psychometricians, incorrect scores.

Estimated loadings of The Sargasso Test on particular item types

These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.

Typeng loading of The Sargasso Test on that type
Verbal2340.77
Numerical620.63
Spatial1030.71
Logical540.61
Heterogeneous4060.75

N = 859

Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.

Balanced g loading = 0.69

National medians for The Sargasso Test

Country n median score
United_Kingdom338.0
Netherlands237.5
Sweden537.0
Romania236.0
Spain536.0
Canada235.5
France235.5
Germany335.5
India232.8
United_States1932.0
Finland430.0
Korea_South329.0
Greece223.5

For reasons of privacy, only countries with 2 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the medians, and then alphabetic.

Correlation with national I.Q.'s of The Sargasso Test

Correlation of this test with national average I.Q.'s published by Lynn and Vanhanen:

Correlation of The Sargasso Test with personal details

Personalia n r
Observed associative horizon60.62
P.S.I.A. Rare - Revision 2007180.59
P.S.I.A. Introverted - Revision 2007180.53
P.S.I.A. Orderly - Revision 2007180.50
P.S.I.A. Deviance factor - Revision 2007180.49
P.S.I.A. True - Revision 2007180.47
P.S.I.A. Ethics factor - Revision 2007180.45
P.S.I.A. System factor - Revision 2007180.45
P.S.I.A. Extreme - Revision 2007180.43
P.S.I.A. Antisocial - Revision 2007180.36
P.S.I.A. Aspergoid - Revision 2007180.31
P.S.I.A. Neurotic - Revision 2007180.31
P.S.I.A. Just - Revision 2007180.29
P.S.I.A. Cold - Revision 2007180.28
Educational level610.26
P.S.I.A. Rational - Revision 2007180.23
Father's educational level580.04
Disorders (parents and siblings)600.02
Sex640.00
Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes11-0.02
Observed behaviour14-0.03
Year of birth63-0.04
Mother's educational level59-0.10
Disorders (own)60-0.14
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms14-0.18
P.S.I.A. Cruel - Revision 200718-0.27

Estimated g factor loadings upward and downward of particular scores

In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for both values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.

Raw scoreUpward g (N)Downward g (N)
00.73 (1100)NaN (0)
290.66 (885)0.60 (253)
330.53 (574)0.63 (544)
370.61 (248)0.71 (885)
41NaN (0)0.70 (1012)
65NaN (0)0.73 (1100)

Reliability

Remark: These reliability coefficients are low for a stand-alone I.Q. test (.9 or higher is normal) but logical if one considers that the test consists exclusively of "bad" items that were previously removed from other tests.

Error

Scores by age

Age class n median score
65 to 69233.5
60 to 64231.8
50 to 54435.5
45 to 49934.0
40 to 44636.0
35 to 39735.5
30 to 34530.0
25 to 291234.0
22 to 24833.0
20 or 21335.0
18 or 19229.0
17130.0
15128.0
13132.0

N = 63

Scores by year taken

Year taken n median score
2007733.0
2008837.0
2009130.0
2010429.0
2011139.0
2012435.5
2013129.0
2014435.0
2015325.0
2016140.5
2017433.0
2018537.0
2019433.3
2020931.0
2021631.0
2022235.0

ryear taken × median score = -0.00 (N = 64)

Robustness and overall test quality

Item analysis

Item statistics are not published as that would help future candidates. To detect bad items, answers and comments from candidates are studied, as well as, for each problem, the correlation with total score and the proportion of candidates getting it wrong (hardness of the item). Possible bad items are removed or revised, resulting in a revised version of the test; however, in the present test, bad items are left in as the test was purposely constructed out of bad items previously removed from other tests.

Nevertheless, about 60 of the 65 items display normal statistical behaviour in this test environment.