Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 Statistics - Batch scored by Jonathan Wai

© Paul Cooijmans

Scores on Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Jonathan Wai) as of 13 September 2024

Contents type: Verbal.   Period: 2002-2004

-12 *
-10 *
-1 **
0 *
3 *
4 *
6 *
8 *
10 *
11 *
12 **
14 **
15 **
16 *
18 ***
19 **
20 ***
21 ***
22 ****
23 ******
24 ****
25 ****
26 ******
27 ****
28 ***
29 **
30 ****
31 ***
32 *****
33 ***
34 **
35 ***
36 ****
37 **
38 ****
39 **
40 ***
41 **
42 ***
43 ***
44 ******
45 *****
46 *
47 ****
50 *
52 *
53 ****
54 *
56 **
57 **
60 *
62 *
63 *
65 *
66 *
67 *
68 *
70 **
73 *
79 *

Scores by males

n = 101

-12 *
-10 *
-1 **
3 *
4 *
6 *
8 *
10 *
12 *
14 **
15 *
16 *
18 *
19 *
20 ***
21 *
22 ***
23 **
24 **
25 *
26 ***
27 **
28 *
29 **
30 **
31 *
32 ***
33 ***
34 *
35 **
36 ***
37 *
38 ***
39 **
40 ***
41 *
42 ***
43 ***
44 *****
45 ****
46 *
47 ****
52 *
53 ****
54 *
56 **
57 **
60 *
62 *
63 *
65 *
66 *
67 *
68 *
70 *
73 *
79 *

Scores by females

n = 36

0 *
11 *
12 *
18 *
19 *
21 *
22 *
23 ****
24 **
25 **
26 ***
27 **
28 **
30 **
31 **
32 **
34 *
35 *
37 *
41 *
44 *
45 *
50 *
70 *

Correlation of Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Jonathan Wai) with other mental ability tests

Test name n r
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #1120.75
Analogies of Long Test For Genius50.72
Qoymans Automatic Test #140.65
Association subtest of Long Test For Genius60.60
Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato)40.60
International High IQ Society tests (aggregate)120.46
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #2120.36
Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve)50.30
The Final Test50.30
Long Test For Genius40.29
Miscellaneous tests150.26
Space, Time, and Hyperspace10-0.02
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #48-0.27
Analogies #15-0.78

Weighted average of correlations: 0.305 (N = 107)

Estimated g factor loading: 0.55

Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.

Estimated loadings of Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Jonathan Wai) on particular item types

These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.

Typeng loading of Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Jonathan Wai) on that type
Verbal530.55
Spatial10-0.15
Heterogeneous90.67

N = 72

Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.

Balanced g loading = 0.36

Correlation with national I.Q.'s of Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Jonathan Wai)

Correlation of this test with national average I.Q.'s published by Lynn and Vanhanen, later Lynn and Becker:

Correlation of Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Jonathan Wai) with personal details

Personalia n r
Disorders (own)120.26
Sex1370.19
Educational level120.17
Disorders (parents and siblings)12-0.10
Father's educational level11-0.44
Year of birth109-0.45
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms8-0.51
Mother's educational level11-0.62

Estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges

In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for these values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.

Below 1st quartileNaN (0)
Below median-0.54 (19)
Above median0.48 (88)
Above 3rd quartile0.41 (68)

Reliability

Error

Scores by age

Age class n Median score
65 to 69253.5
60 to 64122.0
55 to 59252.5
50 to 54170.0
45 to 49449.5
40 to 441042.5
35 to 39852.5
30 to 34931.0
25 to 292034.0
22 to 241537.0
20 or 21925.0
18 or 191130.0
17324.0
16413.0
14521.0
13124.0
12130.0

N = 106

Scores by age - within females

Age class n Median raw
55 to 59126.0
50 to 54170.0
45 to 49132.0
40 to 44242.5
35 to 39225.0
30 to 34225.0
25 to 29427.5
22 to 24534.0
20 or 21218.0
18 or 19421.0
17124.0
16224.5
14222.0
12130.0

N = 30

Scores by age - within males

Age class n Median raw
65 to 69253.5
60 to 64122.0
55 to 59179.0
45 to 49354.0
40 to 44846.0
35 to 39661.0
30 to 34733.0
25 to 291636.0
22 to 241041.5
20 or 21729.0
18 or 19734.0
17217.0
1621.0
14321.0
13124.0

N = 76

Scores by year taken

Year taken n median scoreprotonorm
200210232.0316
20034130.0308

ryear taken × median score = -1.00 (N = 143)

Robustness and overall test quality

Item analysis

Item statistics are not published as that would help candidates. To detect bad items, answers and comments from candidates are studied, as well as, for each problem, the correlation with total score on the remaining problems (item-rest correlation) and the proportion of candidates getting it wrong (hardness of the item). Possible bad items are revised, replaced, or removed, possibly resulting in a revised version of the test.