These are statistics based on the W-87 scores reported by test candidates.
121 | * |
129 | * |
145 | ** |
149 | * |
150 | ********* |
151 | ** |
152 | * |
153 | * |
154 | **** |
155 | ** |
156 | *** |
157 | *** |
159 | * |
160 | ** |
(Test index) Test name | n | r |
---|---|---|
(241) Ultra Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 4 | 0.86 |
(79) Association subtest of Long Test For Genius | 9 | 0.46 |
(229) Mega Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 14 | 0.45 |
(75) Analogies of Long Test For Genius | 8 | 0.36 |
(10) Genius Association Test | 5 | 0.35 |
(239) Titan Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 5 | 0.32 |
(56) Short Test For Genius | 5 | 0.27 |
(63) Long Test For Genius | 8 | 0.19 |
(68) Numbers | 7 | 0.16 |
(218) Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.) | 6 | 0.13 |
(85) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 1 | 7 | 0.11 |
(242) Unknown and miscellaneous tests | 17 | 0.09 |
(87) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 5 | 0.08 |
(7) The Final Test | 15 | 0.07 |
(231) Tests by Greg Grove (aggregate) | 4 | -0.06 |
(57) Space, Time, and Hyperspace | 10 | -0.12 |
(51) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #1 | 4 | -0.25 |
(80) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 4 | -0.27 |
(211) Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström) | 7 | -0.37 |
(235) Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve) | 4 | -0.54 |
(201) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales | 6 | -0.64 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.108 (N = 154, weighted sum = 16.56)
Conservatively estimated minimum g loading: 0.33
These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.
Type | n | g loading of W-87 (I.S.P.E.) on that type |
---|---|---|
Verbal | 45 | 0.41 |
Numerical | 7 | 0.40 |
Spatial | 10 | -0.35 |
Heterogeneous | 44 | 0.52 |
N = 106
Balanced g loading = 0.25
Country | n | median score |
---|---|---|
United_States | 12 | 153.5 |
Denmark | 2 | 152.0 |
Canada | 2 | 151.0 |
Netherlands | 4 | 149.5 |
Correlation of this test with national average I.Q.'s published by Lynn and Vanhanen:
Personalia | n | r |
---|---|---|
Father's educational level | 8 | 0.52 |
Educational level | 9 | 0.28 |
Mother's educational level | 8 | 0.10 |
Observed associative horizon | 7 | -0.05 |
Observed behaviour | 5 | -0.07 |
Sex | 33 | -0.11 |
Year of birth | 30 | -0.11 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 8 | -0.27 |
Disorders (own) | 9 | -0.30 |
In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for both values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.
Raw score | Upward g (N) | Downward g (N) |
---|---|---|
121 | 0.33 (154) | NaN (0) |
149 | 0.28 (123) | NaN (0) |
152 | 0.49 (52) | 0.29 (63) |
155 | 0.66 (22) | 0.29 (104) |
160 | NaN (0) | 0.33 (154) |