These are statistics based on the scores on the Test of Inductive Reasoning and J.C.T.I. by Xavier Jouve as reported by test candidates of I.Q. Tests for the High Range. Please keep the following in mind: As a result of candidates' tendency to report their higher scores while withholding lower ones, there may be an upward bias in the reported scores, while the possible correlation with other variables is reduced as a result of the restriction of range inherent to this incomplete reporting.
| 123 | * |
| 129 | * |
| 130 | * |
| 135 | * |
| 139 | * |
| 141 | * |
| 144 | *** |
| 145 | ** |
| 146 | *** |
| 148 | * |
| 149 | * |
| 150 | ** |
| 151 | * |
| 153 | * |
| 154 | * |
| 156 | *** |
| 161 | * |
| 162 | * |
| 163 | * |
| (Test index) Test name | n | r |
|---|---|---|
| (211) Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström) | 6 | 0.96 |
| (79) Association subtest of Long Test For Genius | 7 | 0.94 |
| (19) Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 4 | 0.92 |
| (216) Tests by Ivan Ivec (aggregate) | 5 | 0.92 |
| (63) Long Test For Genius | 7 | 0.91 |
| (201) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales | 4 | 0.87 |
| (2) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3 | 8 | 0.83 |
| (75) Analogies of Long Test For Genius | 7 | 0.78 |
| (16) Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 10 | 0.74 |
| (235) Nonverbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve) | 11 | 0.72 |
| (212) Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (raw) | 4 | 0.71 |
| (57) Space, Time, and Hyperspace | 11 | 0.69 |
| (44) Associative LIMIT | 8 | 0.65 |
| (62) Reason Behind Multiple-Choice | 4 | 0.59 |
| (26) Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 8 | 0.54 |
| (10) Genius Association Test | 11 | 0.52 |
| (7) The Final Test | 6 | 0.50 |
| (87) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 5 | 0.48 |
| (234) Strict Logic Sequences Exam I (Jonathan Wai) | 11 | 0.48 |
| (226) Logima Strictica 24 (Robert Lato) | 5 | 0.45 |
| (242) Unknown and miscellaneous tests | 16 | 0.45 |
| (218) Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.) | 4 | 0.38 |
| (66) Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 7 | 0.26 |
| (225) Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato) | 10 | 0.25 |
| (27) Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 9 | 0.10 |
| (80) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 10 | 0.10 |
| (24) Reason - Revision 2008 | 5 | 0.09 |
| (82) Reason | 4 | 0.05 |
| (231) Tests by Greg Grove (aggregate) | 6 | 0.04 |
| (53) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 | 8 | -0.05 |
| (214) Epiq Tests (aggregate) | 7 | -0.05 |
| (236) International High IQ Society tests (aggregate) | 8 | -0.21 |
| (40) Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008 | 5 | -0.54 |
| (68) Numbers | 6 | -0.59 |
| (25) The Sargasso Test | 5 | -0.71 |
| (3) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5 | 5 | -0.81 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.382 (N = 257, weighted sum = 98.21)
Conservatively estimated minimum g loading: 0.62
Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.
Too little data.
| Country | n | median score |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 2 | 154.5 |
| Germany | 2 | 150.0 |
| Sweden | 4 | 148.5 |
| United_States | 8 | 141.5 |
| Italy | 2 | 136.5 |
For reasons of privacy, only countries with 2 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the medians, and then alphabetic.
Correlation of this test with national average I.Q.'s published by Lynn and Vanhanen:
| Personalia | n | r |
|---|---|---|
| P.S.I.A. Orderly - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.95 |
| P.S.I.A. Cruel - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.85 |
| P.S.I.A. Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.69 |
| Observed behaviour | 7 | 0.66 |
| P.S.I.A. System factor - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.54 |
| P.S.I.A. Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.52 |
| P.S.I.A. Just - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.29 |
| Father's educational level | 25 | 0.15 |
| P.S.I.A. Rare - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.12 |
| Educational level | 25 | 0.06 |
| Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 6 | 0.05 |
| P.S.I.A. Introverted - Revision 2007 | 4 | -0.02 |
| P.S.I.A. Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 4 | -0.03 |
| P.S.I.A. Extreme - Revision 2007 | 4 | -0.04 |
| P.S.I.A. Rational - Revision 2007 | 4 | -0.05 |
| P.S.I.A. Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 4 | -0.09 |
| Mother's educational level | 25 | -0.09 |
| Disorders (parents and siblings) | 25 | -0.15 |
| P.S.I.A. Cold - Revision 2007 | 4 | -0.15 |
| Disorders (own) | 25 | -0.25 |
| Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes | 7 | -0.30 |
| Year of birth | 27 | -0.38 |
| P.S.I.A. True - Revision 2007 | 4 | -0.57 |
| P.S.I.A. Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 4 | -0.76 |
| Observed associative horizon | 4 | -0.80 |
In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for both values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.
| Raw score | Upward g (N) | Downward g (N) |
|---|---|---|
| 123 | 0.62 (257) | NaN (0) |
| 141 | 0.45 (175) | 0.56 (20) |
| 146 | 0.52 (110) | 0.62 (106) |
| 151 | -0.37 (23) | 0.57 (156) |
| 163 | NaN (0) | 0.62 (257) |