Here the available statistics of the Titan Test, by Ronald K. Hoeflin, based on reported scores.
2 | * |
2.5 | * |
4 | * |
5 | * |
9 | * |
13 | ** |
14 | ** |
15 | ** |
16 | *** |
19 | * |
22 | *** |
23 | ** |
24 | ***** |
25 | ** |
26 | ** |
28 | *** |
32 | ** |
33 | * |
35 | *** |
36 | ** |
37 | * |
38 | ** |
39 | * |
43 | ** |
45 | * |
46 | * |
48 | * |
Test name | n | r |
---|---|---|
The Nemesis Test | 4 | 0.99 |
Hoeflin Power Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 4 | 0.98 |
Test of the Beheaded Man | 6 | 0.98 |
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008 | 8 | 0.97 |
G-test (Nikos Lygeros) | 4 | 0.95 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5 | 8 | 0.93 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3 | 8 | 0.93 |
Reason - Revision 2008 | 8 | 0.91 |
Reflections In Peroxide | 5 | 0.90 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test 5 | 4 | 0.88 |
Mega Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 20 | 0.87 |
Narcissus' last stand | 5 | 0.87 |
Epiq Tests (aggregate) | 6 | 0.85 |
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the third degree | 4 | 0.84 |
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the first degree | 4 | 0.84 |
Cattell Culture Fair | 6 | 0.82 |
Ultra Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 8 | 0.80 |
Cooijmans On-Line Test - Two-barrelled version | 4 | 0.78 |
Short Test For Genius | 10 | 0.76 |
The Final Test | 18 | 0.76 |
Association subtest of Long Test For Genius | 11 | 0.76 |
Analogies of Long Test For Genius | 11 | 0.75 |
Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 11 | 0.75 |
Unknown and miscellaneous tests | 17 | 0.75 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 8 | 0.69 |
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 12 | 0.68 |
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.) | 4 | 0.67 |
The Sargasso Test | 8 | 0.65 |
Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 13 | 0.64 |
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (raw) | 5 | 0.63 |
Associative LIMIT | 7 | 0.61 |
Analogies #1 | 6 | 0.60 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 5 | 0.60 |
Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 9 | 0.59 |
Numbers | 15 | 0.59 |
Long Test For Genius | 8 | 0.59 |
The Test To End All Tests | 11 | 0.56 |
Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve) | 4 | 0.55 |
Isis Test | 10 | 0.49 |
Space, Time, and Hyperspace | 14 | 0.44 |
Genius Association Test | 11 | 0.41 |
Tests by Greg Grove (aggregate) | 6 | 0.35 |
W-87 (International Society for Philosophical Enquiry) | 5 | 0.32 |
Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 5 | 0.28 |
Bonsai Test | 4 | 0.18 |
Tests by Mislav Predavec (aggregate) | 5 | 0.06 |
Test of Shock and Awe | 6 | -0.05 |
Cartoons of Shock | 10 | -0.07 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 1 | 5 | -0.09 |
Chimera High Ability Riddle Test (Bill Bultas) | 5 | -0.24 |
Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato) | 8 | -0.53 |
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version) | 4 | -0.91 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.601 (N = 407)
Estimated g factor loading: 0.78
These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.
Type | n | g loading of Titan Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) on that type |
---|---|---|
Verbal | 101 | 0.80 |
Numerical | 20 | 0.72 |
Spatial | 36 | 0.74 |
Logical | 8 | 0.95 |
Heterogeneous | 141 | 0.78 |
N = 306
Balanced g loading = 0.80
Country | n | median score |
---|---|---|
Finland | 3 | 24.0 |
Sweden | 3 | 24.0 |
Canada | 4 | 23.5 |
United_States | 20 | 23.0 |
Correlation of this test with national average I.Q.'s published by Lynn and Vanhanen:
Personalia | n | r |
---|---|---|
Observed associative horizon | 9 | 0.61 |
Disorders (own) | 22 | 0.37 |
PSIA Rational - Revision 2007 | 5 | 0.28 |
PSIA Cruel - Revision 2007 | 5 | 0.27 |
Sex | 49 | 0.26 |
PSIA Just - Revision 2007 | 5 | 0.13 |
Educational level | 22 | 0.09 |
Observed behaviour | 16 | 0.06 |
Mother's educational level | 20 | -0.01 |
Father's educational level | 19 | -0.06 |
PSIA Extreme - Revision 2007 | 5 | -0.08 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 20 | -0.10 |
PSIA Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 5 | -0.10 |
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 10 | -0.16 |
Year of birth | 47 | -0.18 |
PSIA System factor - Revision 2007 | 5 | -0.22 |
PSIA Rare - Revision 2007 | 5 | -0.28 |
PSIA Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 5 | -0.31 |
PSIA Orderly - Revision 2007 | 5 | -0.33 |
PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 5 | -0.38 |
PSIA Cold - Revision 2007 | 5 | -0.39 |
PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 5 | -0.67 |
PSIA True - Revision 2007 | 5 | -0.73 |
PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 5 | -0.76 |
PSIA Introverted - Revision 2007 | 5 | -0.78 |
In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for these values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.
Below 1st quartile | 0.84 (65) |
---|---|
Below median | 0.55 (165) |
Above median | 0.74 (255) |
Above 3rd quartile | 0.62 (95) |