Tests by Nikolaos Soulios (aggregate) statistics

Paul Cooijmans

Introduction

These are statistics based on the scores on Tests by Nikolaos Soulios (aggregate) as reported by test candidates of I.Q. Tests for the High Range.

Scores on Tests by Nikolaos Soulios (aggregate) as of 1 September 2024

130 *
133 *
134 *
136 *
137 *
138 *
143 *
144 *
145 *
146 ***
148 *
150 ***
151 *
152 *
154 ***
155 **
156 ***
157 *
160 ***
162 **
165 **
166 *
170 *

Correlation of Tests by Nikolaos Soulios (aggregate) with other mental ability tests

Test name n r
Tests by Ivan Ivec (aggregate)110.97
Daedalus Test40.95
Test of the Beheaded Man40.94
International High IQ Society tests (aggregate)40.93
The Test To End All Tests60.92
Cattell Culture Fair40.91
The Alchemist Test (Anas El Husseini)40.90
Tests by Iakovos Koukas (aggregate)50.81
Tests by Paul Laurent Miranda (aggregate)40.79
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 201090.78
Tests by James Dorsey (aggregate)70.77
Strict Logic Sequences Exam I (Jonathan Wai)40.75
Test For Genius - Revision 201060.74
Tests by Jason Betts (aggregate)100.73
Reflections In Peroxide60.72
Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004100.71
Narcissus' last stand40.69
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 200480.67
The Bonsai Test - Revision 201690.67
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3130.65
Genius Association Test120.64
Miscellaneous tests210.63
Tests by Theodosis Prousalis (aggregate)50.61
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4120.60
Isis Test70.60
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 201670.59
Associative LIMIT120.58
Test For Genius - Revision 201670.56
Cooijmans On-Line Test - Two-barrelled version40.55
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5130.53
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree60.53
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008130.49
Advanced Intelligence Test (Randy Myers)130.48
Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test50.44
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 201690.43
Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test120.41
Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010160.41
Numerical section of The Marathon Test50.38
The Nemesis Test60.37
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011150.37
Space, Time, and Hyperspace - Revision 201690.35
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the third degree100.35
Reason - Revision 2008130.34
Random Feickery (Brandon Feick)40.16
Cooijmans Intelligence Test 580.10
Dicing with death60.10
The Sargasso Test120.09
Spatial section of The Marathon Test50.00
A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude7-0.02
The Marathon Test4-0.10
Cartoons of Shock6-0.11
Verbal section of The Marathon Test4-0.59

Weighted average of correlations: 0.515 (N = 420)

Estimated g factor loading: 0.72

Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.

Estimated loadings of Tests by Nikolaos Soulios (aggregate) on particular item types

These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.

Typeng loading of Tests by Nikolaos Soulios (aggregate) on that type
Verbal500.74
Numerical250.68
Spatial490.66
Logical170.69
Heterogeneous1390.64

N = 280

Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.

Balanced g loading = 0.68

National medians for Tests by Nikolaos Soulios (aggregate)

Country n median score
Netherlands3157.0
Sweden3154.0
Canada3152.0
United_States6149.0

For reasons of privacy, only countries with 3 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the medians, and then alphabetic.

Correlation with national I.Q.'s of Tests by Nikolaos Soulios (aggregate)

Correlation of this test with national average I.Q.'s published by Lynn and Vanhanen, later Lynn and Becker:

Correlation of Tests by Nikolaos Soulios (aggregate) with personal details

Personalia n r
Year of birth310.24
PSIA Cruel - Revision 200790.20
Sex360.13
Mother's educational level250.08
Father's educational level240.07
PSIA Neurotic - Revision 200790.02
Disorders (own)28-0.01
PSIA Just - Revision 20079-0.03
PSIA Cold - Revision 20079-0.10
PSIA System factor - Revision 20079-0.13
PSIA Rational - Revision 20079-0.23
PSIA True - Revision 20079-0.25
PSIA Orderly - Revision 20079-0.26
PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 20079-0.26
Educational level27-0.27
Disorders (parents and siblings)27-0.27
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms5-0.29
PSIA Introverted - Revision 20079-0.35
PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 20079-0.37
PSIA Rare - Revision 20079-0.54
PSIA Antisocial - Revision 20079-0.54
PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 20079-0.68
PSIA Extreme - Revision 20079-0.69

Estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges

In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for these values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.

Below 1st quartile0.69 (22)
Below median0.29 (200)
Above median0.54 (189)
Above 3rd quartile0.69 (124)