Hoeflin Power Test statistics

Paul Cooijmans

Introduction

These are statistics based on the Hoeflin Power Test scores reported by test candidates.

Scores on Hoeflin Power Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) as of 8 July 2026

Contents type: Numerical, spatial.   

11 *
12 *
13 *
14 *
16 *
22 *
23 ***
26 *
27 ***
28 **
29 **
30 *
32 ****
33 *
34 **

Correlation of Hoeflin Power Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) with other mental ability tests

Test name n rp value
Strict Logic Sequences Examination I (Jonathan Wai)51.000.05
Titan Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin)40.980.09
Ultra Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin)60.970.03
Miscellaneous tests60.760.09
Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato)50.530.28
Short Test For Genius40.460.42
Analogies of Long Test For Genius40.300.62
Mega Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin)90.230.50
The Final Test60.220.64
Space, Time, and Hyperspace90.210.54
Cattell Culture Fair50.210.68
Long Test For Genius40.160.78
Association subtest of Long Test For Genius50.140.78
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 160.130.76
Numbers6-0.060.90
The Test To End All Tests4-0.130.81

Weighted mean of correlations: 0.370 (N = 88)

Estimated g factor loading: 0.61

Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.

Estimated loadings of Hoeflin Power Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) on particular item types

These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.

Typeng loading of Hoeflin Power Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) on that type
Verbal190.37
Numerical110.65
Spatial140.57
Heterogeneous290.71

N = 73

Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.

Balanced g loading = 0.57

For reasons of privacy, only countries with 3 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the medians, and then alphabetic.

National means for Hoeflin Power Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin)

Country n mean score
United_States629.7
Netherlands327.7
Belgium325.3
Sweden322.7

Total number of countries: 12

For reasons of privacy, only countries with 3 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the unrounded means, and then alphabetic.

Correlation of Hoeflin Power Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) with personal details

Notice: A correlation is generally considered significant if its p value is 0.05 or less.

Personalia n rp value
Year of birth240.440.03
Mother's educational level90.180.62
Disorders (parents and siblings)9-0.080.81
Disorders (own)9-0.170.64
Father's educational level9-0.230.52
Educational level10-0.260.42
Observed behaviour7-0.280.48

Estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges

The goal of estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for these values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.

Below 1st quartile (23.0)-0.39 (N = 11)
Below median (27.0)0.55 (N = 20)
Above median (27.0)0.45 (N = 61)
Above 3rd quartile (32.0)0.72 (N = 16)