Logicaus Strictimanus 24 statistics

Paul Cooijmans

Introduction

These statistics are based on scores on this test as reported by candidates taking tests from I.Q. Tests for the High Range.

Scores on Logicaus Strictimanus 24 (Robert Lato) as of 4 May 2026

Contents type: Spatial.   

3.5 *
4 *
4.5 *
5 ***
5.5 *
6 ***
6.5 *
7 ***
7.5 **
8 ***
10 *
10.5 ***
11.5 *
12 ***
12.5 **
13 **
13.5 *
14 *
15 *

Correlation of Logicaus Strictimanus 24 (Robert Lato) with other mental ability tests

Test name n rp value
The Final Test40.990.09
Tests by Ivan Ivec (aggregate)80.920.02
Tests by Paul Laurent Miranda (aggregate)60.920.04
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (raw)40.890.12
Strict Logic Sequences Examination II (Jonathan Wai)80.880.02
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 201050.850.09
Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010110.810.01
The Marathon Test50.800.11
Epiq Tests (aggregate)130.780.007
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree60.770.08
Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato)250.760.0002
Strict Logic Spatial Examination 48 (Jonathan Wai)110.750.02
Test of the Beheaded Man70.720.08
Strict Logic Sequences Examination I (Jonathan Wai)180.660.006
Numerical section of The Marathon Test60.660.14
Verbal section of The Marathon Test50.660.18
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 450.650.19
The Sargasso Test60.620.16
916 Test (Laurent Dubois)70.610.13
Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test60.570.20
Test of Inductive Reasoning / J.C.T.I. (Xavier Jouve)60.560.20
Spatial section of The Marathon Test60.550.22
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #550.480.34
Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004100.470.16
Test For Genius - Revision 200460.470.30
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 260.460.30
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 200470.450.27
Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test120.440.14
Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström)120.390.19
Titan Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin)40.340.54
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 390.340.34
Genius Association Test100.310.36
Miscellaneous tests110.260.40
Tests by Theodosis Prousalis (aggregate)40.260.64
Space, Time, and Hyperspace60.220.62
Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve)70.180.66
Tests by Xavier Jouve, other than those listed separately (aggregate)50.160.76
Daedalus Test50.120.81
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 200850.090.87
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 201660.050.90
Reflections In Peroxide40.010.97
Space, Time, and Hyperspace - Revision 20166-0.070.87
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales4-0.070.90
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.)5-0.090.84
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #44-0.150.78
The Nemesis Test4-0.280.64
Associative LIMIT10-0.340.30
International High IQ Society tests (aggregate)4-0.360.54
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the third degree4-0.400.48
Numbers4-0.660.26
Tests by Jason Betts (aggregate)5-0.700.16
A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude5-0.710.15
The Test To End All Tests4-0.880.12
Reason - Revision 20085-0.910.07

Weighted mean of correlations: 0.391 (N = 376)

Estimated g factor loading: 0.63

Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.

Estimated loadings of Logicaus Strictimanus 24 (Robert Lato) on particular item types

These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.

Typeng loading of Logicaus Strictimanus 24 (Robert Lato) on that type
Verbal390.55
Numerical470.79
Spatial760.74
Logical16-0.19
Heterogeneous860.57

N = 264

Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.

Balanced g loading = 0.49

National medians for Logicaus Strictimanus 24 (Robert Lato)

Country n median score
Croatia312.5
France310.5
Sweden910.5
Germany36.0
United_States45.3

Total number of countries: 16

For reasons of privacy, only countries with 3 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the medians, and then alphabetic.

Correlation of Logicaus Strictimanus 24 (Robert Lato) with personal details

Personalia n rp value
PSIA Orderly - Revision 200740.970.10
PSIA Just - Revision 200740.910.12
PSIA System factor - Revision 200740.890.12
PSIA Antisocial - Revision 200740.760.18
PSIA Introverted - Revision 200740.710.22
PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 200740.660.25
PSIA Cruel - Revision 200740.590.30
PSIA Extreme - Revision 200740.550.36
PSIA Rational - Revision 200740.440.44
PSIA Rare - Revision 200740.270.64
Mother's educational level220.260.25
PSIA Cold - Revision 200740.240.68
Father's educational level210.170.46
PSIA Neurotic - Revision 200740.150.78
PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 200740.070.90
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms70.060.87
Year of birth340.010.94
Disorders (own)24-0.110.60
Educational level22-0.260.24
Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes7-0.320.42
Disorders (parents and siblings)22-0.350.11
PSIA True - Revision 20074-0.640.27
PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 20074-1.000.08

Notice: A correlation is generally considered significant if its p value is 0.05 or less.

Estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges

The goal of estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for these values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.

Below 1st quartile (6.0)0.10 (N = 147)
Below median (8.0)0.51 (N = 292)
Above median (8.0)0.58 (N = 99)
Above 3rd quartile (12.0)0.47 (N = 26)