These are statistics based on scores on Tests by Xavier Jouve, other than those listed separately, reported by test candidates.
105 | * |
130 | ** |
136 | *** |
138 | *** |
140 | *** |
141 | * |
142 | * |
148 | * |
149 | * |
151 | * |
152 | * |
153 | * |
154 | * |
156 | * |
157 | * |
160 | * |
163 | * |
170 | * |
Test name | n | r |
---|---|---|
Tests by Paul Laurent Miranda (aggregate) | 5 | 0.99 |
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (raw) | 4 | 0.94 |
Test of Inductive Reasoning / J.C.T.I. (Xavier Jouve) | 6 | 0.90 |
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version) | 4 | 0.85 |
Cattell Culture Fair | 4 | 0.84 |
Tests by Mislav Predavec (aggregate) | 5 | 0.84 |
Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 4 | 0.82 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3 | 9 | 0.80 |
Strict Logic Sequences Exam II (Jonathan Wai) | 4 | 0.79 |
Strict Logic Sequences Exam I (Jonathan Wai) | 13 | 0.69 |
Tests by Ivan Ivec (aggregate) | 5 | 0.68 |
Analogies #1 | 4 | 0.66 |
The Sargasso Test | 4 | 0.65 |
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales | 5 | 0.65 |
Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 6 | 0.58 |
Analogies of Long Test For Genius | 6 | 0.56 |
Miscellaneous tests | 16 | 0.55 |
Genius Association Test | 8 | 0.53 |
Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 7 | 0.50 |
Associative LIMIT | 5 | 0.49 |
Qoymans Automatic Test #2 | 5 | 0.42 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #1 | 7 | 0.41 |
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 5 | 0.40 |
Epiq Tests (aggregate) | 6 | 0.39 |
Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 8 | 0.38 |
Omega Contemplative Items Pool (Tommy Smith) | 5 | 0.35 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5 | 7 | 0.34 |
Association subtest of Long Test For Genius | 6 | 0.34 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4 | 4 | 0.30 |
Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato) | 11 | 0.27 |
Tests by Theodosis Prousalis (aggregate) | 5 | 0.20 |
The Nemesis Test | 5 | 0.12 |
Logima Strictica 24 (Robert Lato) | 5 | 0.11 |
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 6 | 0.07 |
Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve) | 9 | 0.03 |
The Final Test | 6 | 0.02 |
Long Test For Genius | 5 | 0.00 |
Space, Time, and Hyperspace | 9 | -0.02 |
Tests by Jason Betts (aggregate) | 5 | -0.06 |
Evens | 6 | -0.09 |
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008 | 7 | -0.12 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 4 | -0.17 |
916 Test (Laurent Dubois) | 7 | -0.19 |
Reason - Revision 2008 | 7 | -0.22 |
Tests by Greg Grove (aggregate) | 9 | -0.27 |
Tests by Nicolas Elenas (aggregate) | 6 | -0.30 |
Verbal section of The Marathon Test | 4 | -0.33 |
Spatial section of The Marathon Test | 4 | -0.37 |
Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test | 4 | -0.42 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #2 | 4 | -0.46 |
International High IQ Society tests (aggregate) | 5 | -0.46 |
New York High I.Q. Society tests | 4 | -0.46 |
Qoymans Automatic Test #1 | 4 | -0.66 |
Numerical section of The Marathon Test | 4 | -0.69 |
The Marathon Test | 4 | -0.72 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.254 (N = 326)
Estimated g factor loading: 0.50
These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.
Type | n | g loading of Tests by Xavier Jouve, other than those listed separately (aggregate) on that type |
---|---|---|
Verbal | 62 | 0.48 |
Numerical | 30 | 0.55 |
Spatial | 32 | 0.41 |
Logical | 13 | 0.55 |
Heterogeneous | 51 | 0.51 |
N = 188
Balanced g loading = 0.50
Country | n | median score |
---|---|---|
Germany | 3 | 140.0 |
Sweden | 3 | 140.0 |
United_States | 6 | 133.0 |
Correlation of this test with national average I.Q.'s published by Lynn and Vanhanen, later Lynn and Becker:
Personalia | n | r |
---|---|---|
PSIA Extreme - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.99 |
PSIA Rare - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.98 |
PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.97 |
PSIA Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.84 |
PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.83 |
PSIA Cold - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.73 |
PSIA Rational - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.70 |
PSIA Introverted - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.70 |
Observed behaviour | 7 | 0.69 |
PSIA Cruel - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.45 |
PSIA System factor - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.27 |
Educational level | 19 | 0.23 |
Mother's educational level | 18 | 0.04 |
Disorders (own) | 19 | 0.02 |
Father's educational level | 18 | 0.01 |
PSIA Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 4 | -0.18 |
PSIA Just - Revision 2007 | 4 | -0.19 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 19 | -0.25 |
Year of birth | 24 | -0.32 |
PSIA True - Revision 2007 | 4 | -0.34 |
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 5 | -0.36 |
PSIA Orderly - Revision 2007 | 4 | -0.65 |
PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 4 | -0.89 |
In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for these values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.
Below 1st quartile | 0.66 (69) |
---|---|
Below median | 0.46 (124) |
Above median | 0.46 (128) |
Above 3rd quartile | 0.80 (46) |