These are statistics based on the scores on the tests by Jason Betts (aggregate) as reported by test candidates of I.Q. Tests for the High Range.
| 139 | * |
| 141 | * |
| 143 | * |
| 144 | * |
| 145 | *** |
| 146 | * |
| 147 | * |
| 148 | **** |
| 149 | ** |
| 150 | ** |
| 151 | ** |
| 152 | *** |
| 153 | ** |
| 154 | * |
| 155 | *** |
| 156 | * |
| 158 | *** |
| 164 | * |
| 167 | ** |
| 168 | * |
| Test name | n | r | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Labyrinthine LIMIT | 5 | 0.96 | 0.05 |
| Only idiots | 4 | 0.96 | 0.10 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 4 | 0.93 | 0.10 |
| International High IQ Society tests (aggregate) | 4 | 0.89 | 0.12 |
| Daedalus Test | 4 | 0.89 | 0.12 |
| The Piper's Test | 5 | 0.87 | 0.08 |
| The Gate | 4 | 0.79 | 0.17 |
| The Smell Test | 4 | 0.79 | 0.17 |
| Tests by Paul Laurent Miranda (aggregate) | 6 | 0.74 | 0.10 |
| Advanced Intelligence Test (Randy Myers) | 9 | 0.73 | 0.04 |
| Test of the Beheaded Man | 9 | 0.72 | 0.04 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test 5 | 10 | 0.69 | 0.04 |
| Tests by Nikolaos Soulios (aggregate) | 12 | 0.68 | 0.02 |
| Tests by James Dorsey (aggregate) | 8 | 0.68 | 0.07 |
| Divine Psychometry (Matthew Scillitani) | 4 | 0.66 | 0.26 |
| Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 8 | 0.61 | 0.10 |
| The Test To End All Tests | 6 | 0.61 | 0.17 |
| Dicing with death | 6 | 0.61 | 0.17 |
| Narcissus' last stand | 5 | 0.59 | 0.24 |
| Associative LIMIT | 7 | 0.58 | 0.16 |
| The Alchemist Test (Anas El Husseini) | 8 | 0.57 | 0.13 |
| Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011 | 12 | 0.48 | 0.11 |
| Miscellaneous tests | 25 | 0.47 | 0.02 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3 | 19 | 0.47 | 0.05 |
| Tests by Ivan Ivec (aggregate) | 19 | 0.46 | 0.05 |
| Problems In Gentle Slopes of the third degree | 10 | 0.46 | 0.16 |
| Tests by Iakovos Koukas (aggregate) | 7 | 0.45 | 0.27 |
| Strict Logic Sequences Examination II (Jonathan Wai) | 5 | 0.42 | 0.40 |
| Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 7 | 0.41 | 0.32 |
| Sequentia Numerica Form I (Alexander Herkner) | 5 | 0.41 | 0.40 |
| Tests by Marc-André Nydegger (aggregate) | 6 | 0.41 | 0.37 |
| Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 9 | 0.40 | 0.26 |
| Verbal section of The Marathon Test | 7 | 0.40 | 0.34 |
| The Nemesis Test | 10 | 0.39 | 0.24 |
| Isis Test | 10 | 0.38 | 0.26 |
| A Relaxing Test (David Miller) | 4 | 0.37 | 0.52 |
| Strict Logic Sequences Examination I (Jonathan Wai) | 9 | 0.35 | 0.34 |
| Tests by Arne Andre Gangvik (aggregate) | 5 | 0.33 | 0.50 |
| Spatial section of The Marathon Test | 6 | 0.23 | 0.60 |
| Tests by Mislav Predavec (aggregate) | 11 | 0.20 | 0.52 |
| Reflections In Peroxide | 7 | 0.20 | 0.62 |
| A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude | 11 | 0.18 | 0.57 |
| Numbers | 4 | 0.17 | 0.76 |
| Genius Association Test | 10 | 0.13 | 0.68 |
| Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 16 | 0.13 | 0.62 |
| Gliaweb Recycled Intelligence Test | 4 | 0.12 | 0.84 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4 | 11 | 0.10 | 0.74 |
| Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 5 | 0.09 | 0.87 |
| The Bonsai Test - Revision 2016 | 9 | 0.09 | 0.81 |
| The Sargasso Test | 13 | 0.06 | 0.81 |
| Tests by Greg Grove (aggregate) | 6 | 0.06 | 0.90 |
| Tests by Xavier Jouve, other than those listed separately (aggregate) | 5 | 0.04 | 0.94 |
| The Marathon Test | 6 | 0.02 | 0.94 |
| Cartoons of Shock | 4 | -0.05 | 0.92 |
| Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.) | 6 | -0.06 | 0.90 |
| Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 11 | -0.08 | 0.78 |
| Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström) | 4 | -0.12 | 0.84 |
| The Final Test | 6 | -0.13 | 0.78 |
| Space, Time, and Hyperspace - Revision 2016 | 11 | -0.13 | 0.66 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5 | 14 | -0.20 | 0.46 |
| Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales | 9 | -0.20 | 0.57 |
| Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree | 6 | -0.20 | 0.64 |
| Space, Time, and Hyperspace | 4 | -0.22 | 0.71 |
| Reason - Revision 2008 | 14 | -0.25 | 0.37 |
| Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008 | 14 | -0.27 | 0.34 |
| Random Feickery (Brandon Feick) | 4 | -0.33 | 0.57 |
| Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test | 6 | -0.44 | 0.34 |
| Numerical section of The Marathon Test | 6 | -0.50 | 0.27 |
| Logicaus Strictimanus 24 (Robert Lato) | 6 | -0.53 | 0.24 |
| Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 7 | -0.68 | 0.10 |
| Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 7 | -0.69 | 0.09 |
| Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato) | 6 | -0.70 | 0.12 |
| Epiq Tests (aggregate) | 5 | -0.75 | 0.13 |
| Tests by Theodosis Prousalis (aggregate) | 6 | -0.84 | 0.06 |
Weighted mean of correlations: 0.227 (N = 581)
Estimated g factor loading: 0.48
Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.
These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.
| Type | n | g loading of Tests by Jason Betts (aggregate) on that type |
|---|---|---|
| Verbal | 59 | 0.25 |
| Numerical | 45 | 0.39 |
| Spatial | 65 | 0.31 |
| Logical | 18 | 0.07 |
| Heterogeneous | 201 | 0.58 |
N = 388
Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.
Balanced g loading = 0.32
| Country | n | median score |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 3 | 154.0 |
| United_States | 8 | 153.5 |
| India | 3 | 152.0 |
| Sweden | 3 | 149.0 |
| Germany | 3 | 148.0 |
Total number of countries: 20
For reasons of privacy, only countries with 3 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the medians, and then alphabetic.
Notice: A correlation is generally considered significant if its p value is 0.05 or less.
| Personalia | n | r | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| PSIA Orderly - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.89 | 0.05 |
| Observed associative horizon | 4 | 0.79 | 0.17 |
| PSIA System factor - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.76 | 0.09 |
| PSIA Just - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.69 | 0.12 |
| PSIA Rare - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.56 | 0.22 |
| PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.52 | 0.25 |
| PSIA Cold - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.46 | 0.30 |
| PSIA True - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.46 | 0.30 |
| PSIA Rational - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.33 | 0.46 |
| PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.27 | 0.54 |
| PSIA Introverted - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.22 | 0.62 |
| PSIA Extreme - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.20 | 0.66 |
| Educational level | 31 | 0.19 | 0.30 |
| PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 6 | 0.15 | 0.74 |
| Father's educational level | 29 | 0.11 | 0.54 |
| Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 4 | 0.08 | 0.90 |
| Year of birth | 34 | 0.01 | 0.97 |
| Mother's educational level | 29 | -0.05 | 0.81 |
| Disorders (own) | 31 | -0.14 | 0.42 |
| Disorders (parents and siblings) | 30 | -0.24 | 0.20 |
| PSIA Cruel - Revision 2007 | 6 | -0.57 | 0.20 |
| PSIA Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 6 | -0.60 | 0.18 |
| PSIA Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 6 | -0.63 | 0.15 |
The goal of estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for these values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.
| Below 1st quartile (147.5) | 0.42 (N = 32) |
|---|---|
| Below median (151.0) | 0.32 (N = 275) |
| Above median (151.0) | 0.37 (N = 280) |
| Above 3rd quartile (155.0) | 0.52 (N = 88) |