Tests by Jason Betts (aggregate) statistics

Paul Cooijmans

Introduction

These are statistics based on the scores on the tests by Jason Betts (aggregate) as reported by test candidates of I.Q. Tests for the High Range.

Scores on Tests by Jason Betts (aggregate) as of 28 September 2026

139 *
141 *
143 *
144 *
145 ***
146 *
147 *
148 ****
149 **
150 **
151 **
152 ***
153 **
154 *
155 ***
156 *
158 ***
164 *
167 **
168 *

Correlation of Tests by Jason Betts (aggregate) with other mental ability tests

Test name n rp value
Labyrinthine LIMIT50.960.05
Only idiots40.960.10
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #440.930.10
International High IQ Society tests (aggregate)40.890.12
Daedalus Test40.890.12
The Piper's Test50.870.08
The Gate40.790.17
The Smell Test40.790.17
Tests by Paul Laurent Miranda (aggregate)60.740.10
Advanced Intelligence Test (Randy Myers)90.730.04
Test of the Beheaded Man90.720.04
Cooijmans Intelligence Test 5100.690.04
Tests by Nikolaos Soulios (aggregate)120.680.02
Tests by James Dorsey (aggregate)80.680.07
Divine Psychometry (Matthew Scillitani)40.660.26
Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test80.610.10
The Test To End All Tests60.610.17
Dicing with death60.610.17
Narcissus' last stand50.590.24
Associative LIMIT70.580.16
The Alchemist Test (Anas El Husseini)80.570.13
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011120.480.11
Miscellaneous tests250.470.02
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3190.470.05
Tests by Ivan Ivec (aggregate)190.460.05
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the third degree100.460.16
Tests by Iakovos Koukas (aggregate)70.450.27
Strict Logic Sequences Examination II (Jonathan Wai)50.420.40
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 201070.410.32
Sequentia Numerica Form I (Alexander Herkner)50.410.40
Tests by Marc-André Nydegger (aggregate)60.410.37
Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 200490.400.26
Verbal section of The Marathon Test70.400.34
The Nemesis Test100.390.24
Isis Test100.380.26
A Relaxing Test (David Miller)40.370.52
Strict Logic Sequences Examination I (Jonathan Wai)90.350.34
Tests by Arne Andre Gangvik (aggregate)50.330.50
Spatial section of The Marathon Test60.230.60
Tests by Mislav Predavec (aggregate)110.200.52
Reflections In Peroxide70.200.62
A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude110.180.57
Numbers40.170.76
Genius Association Test100.130.68
Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010160.130.62
Gliaweb Recycled Intelligence Test40.120.84
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4110.100.74
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 200450.090.87
The Bonsai Test - Revision 201690.090.81
The Sargasso Test130.060.81
Tests by Greg Grove (aggregate)60.060.90
Tests by Xavier Jouve, other than those listed separately (aggregate)50.040.94
The Marathon Test60.020.94
Cartoons of Shock4-0.050.92
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.)6-0.060.90
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 201611-0.080.78
Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström)4-0.120.84
The Final Test6-0.130.78
Space, Time, and Hyperspace - Revision 201611-0.130.66
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #514-0.200.46
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales9-0.200.57
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree6-0.200.64
Space, Time, and Hyperspace4-0.220.71
Reason - Revision 200814-0.250.37
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 200814-0.270.34
Random Feickery (Brandon Feick)4-0.330.57
Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test6-0.440.34
Numerical section of The Marathon Test6-0.500.27
Logicaus Strictimanus 24 (Robert Lato)6-0.530.24
Test For Genius - Revision 20167-0.680.10
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 20167-0.690.09
Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato)6-0.700.12
Epiq Tests (aggregate)5-0.750.13
Tests by Theodosis Prousalis (aggregate)6-0.840.06

Weighted mean of correlations: 0.227 (N = 581)

Estimated g factor loading: 0.48

Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.

Estimated loadings of Tests by Jason Betts (aggregate) on particular item types

These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.

Typeng loading of Tests by Jason Betts (aggregate) on that type
Verbal590.25
Numerical450.39
Spatial650.31
Logical180.07
Heterogeneous2010.58

N = 388

Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.

Balanced g loading = 0.32

National medians for Tests by Jason Betts (aggregate)

Country n median score
Austria3154.0
United_States8153.5
India3152.0
Sweden3149.0
Germany3148.0

Total number of countries: 20

For reasons of privacy, only countries with 3 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the medians, and then alphabetic.

Correlation of Tests by Jason Betts (aggregate) with personal details

Notice: A correlation is generally considered significant if its p value is 0.05 or less.

Personalia n rp value
PSIA Orderly - Revision 200760.890.05
Observed associative horizon40.790.17
PSIA System factor - Revision 200760.760.09
PSIA Just - Revision 200760.690.12
PSIA Rare - Revision 200760.560.22
PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 200760.520.25
PSIA Cold - Revision 200760.460.30
PSIA True - Revision 200760.460.30
PSIA Rational - Revision 200760.330.46
PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 200760.270.54
PSIA Introverted - Revision 200760.220.62
PSIA Extreme - Revision 200760.200.66
Educational level310.190.30
PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 200760.150.74
Father's educational level290.110.54
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms40.080.90
Year of birth340.010.97
Mother's educational level29-0.050.81
Disorders (own)31-0.140.42
Disorders (parents and siblings)30-0.240.20
PSIA Cruel - Revision 20076-0.570.20
PSIA Antisocial - Revision 20076-0.600.18
PSIA Neurotic - Revision 20076-0.630.15

Estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges

The goal of estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for these values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.

Below 1st quartile (147.5)0.42 (N = 32)
Below median (151.0)0.32 (N = 275)
Above median (151.0)0.37 (N = 280)
Above 3rd quartile (155.0)0.52 (N = 88)