Advanced Intelligence Test statistics

Paul Cooijmans

Introduction

This is a test created by Randy Myers.

Scores on Advanced Intelligence Test as of 7 June 2022

Contents type: Spatial.   Period: 2014-present

0 *
2 *
3 *
4 **
5 ***
6 **
7 *****
8 *****
9 ***
10 *****
11 ************
12 ******
13 ***
14 ***
15 ****
16 **
17 ***
18 ******
19 *
20 ******
21 ***
22 *
23 *
25 *

Scores by males

n = 59

0 *
2 *
3 *
5 **
6 **
7 *
8 ****
9 **
10 ****
11 **********
12 ****
13 ***
14 ***
15 **
16 *
17 *
18 ****
19 *
20 ******
21 ***
22 *
23 *
25 *

Scores by females

n = 15

4 **
5 *
7 ****
8 *
9 *
10 *
11 *
12 **
15 *
17 *

Correlation of Advanced Intelligence Test with other tests by I.Q. Tests for the High Range

(Test index) Test name n r
(75) Analogies of Long Test For Genius21.00
(85) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 121.00
(109) The Bonsai Test - Revision 201621.00
(16) Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test31.00
(25) The Sargasso Test30.96
(44) Associative LIMIT30.96
(19) Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 201040.95
(3) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #540.93
(106) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 430.88
(51) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #130.85
(2) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 330.85
(27) Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 200440.82
(23) Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 201160.80
(40) Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 200840.77
(110) Cooijmans Intelligence Test 530.50
(10) Genius Association Test40.41
(53) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #330.34
(68) Numbers30.32
(24) Reason - Revision 200840.11
(39) Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 20103-0.18
(7) The Final Test2-1.00
(26) Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 20042-1.00
(52) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #22-1.00
(79) Association subtest of Long Test For Genius2-1.00
(80) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #42-1.00

Weighted average of correlations: 0.476 (N = 76, weighted sum = 36.19)

Conservatively estimated minimum g loading: 0.69

Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 2 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.

Correlation of Advanced Intelligence Test with tests by others

(Test index) Test name n r
(214) Epiq Tests21.00
(231) Mysterium Entrance Exam21.00
(235) Nonverbal Cognitive Performance Examination21.00
(246) Sequentia Numerica Form I30.94
(242) Unknown and miscellaneous tests310.46
(236) International High IQ Society Miscellaneous tests40.36
(211) Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version30.32
(218) Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.)40.22
(201) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales3-0.48
(225) Logima Strictica 363-0.61
(234) Strict Logic Sequences Exam I2-1.00
(238) 916 Test2-1.00

Weighted average of correlations: 0.315 (N = 61, weighted sum = 19.22)

Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 2 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.

Please be aware that correlations with these external tests are in most cases affected (depressed, typically) by one or more of the following: (1) Little overlap with the object test because of the much lower ceilings and inherent ceiling effects of the tests used in regular psychology; (2) Candidates reporting scores selectively, for instance only the higher ones while withholding lower ones; (3) Candidates reporting, or having been reported by psychometricians, incorrect scores.

Estimated loadings of Advanced Intelligence Test on particular item types

These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.

Typeng loading of Advanced Intelligence Test on that type
Verbal260.19
Numerical70.82
Spatial70.95
Logical40.33
Heterogeneous220.91

N = 66

Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.

Balanced g loading = 0.64

National medians for Advanced Intelligence Test

Country n median score
India222.0
Turkey219.0
Thailand213.5
Germany313.0
Norway213.0
Canada312.0
France212.0
United_States69.0

For reasons of privacy, only countries with 2 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the medians, and then alphabetic.

Correlation of Advanced Intelligence Test with personal details

Personalia n r
Educational level130.52
Sex740.30
Year of birth18-0.03
Father's educational level13-0.08
Mother's educational level13-0.15
Disorders (parents and siblings)13-0.35
Disorders (own)15-0.59

Estimated g factor loadings upward and downward of particular scores

In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for both values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.

Raw scoreUpward g (N)Downward g (N)
00.69 (76)NaN (0)
70.69 (76)NaN (0)
11.50.27 (43)1.00 (2)
160.25 (30)-0.38 (14)
200.00 (8)0.71 (56)
25NaN (0)0.69 (76)