This is a test created by Randy Myers.
0 | * |
2 | * |
3 | * |
4 | ** |
5 | *** |
6 | ** |
7 | ***** |
8 | ***** |
9 | *** |
10 | ***** |
11 | ************ |
12 | ****** |
13 | *** |
14 | *** |
15 | **** |
16 | ** |
17 | *** |
18 | ****** |
19 | * |
20 | ****** |
21 | *** |
22 | * |
23 | * |
25 | * |
n = 59
0 | * |
2 | * |
3 | * |
5 | ** |
6 | ** |
7 | * |
8 | **** |
9 | ** |
10 | **** |
11 | ********** |
12 | **** |
13 | *** |
14 | *** |
15 | ** |
16 | * |
17 | * |
18 | **** |
19 | * |
20 | ****** |
21 | *** |
22 | * |
23 | * |
25 | * |
n = 15
4 | ** |
5 | * |
7 | **** |
8 | * |
9 | * |
10 | * |
11 | * |
12 | ** |
15 | * |
17 | * |
(Test index) Test name | n | r |
---|---|---|
(75) Analogies of Long Test For Genius | 2 | 1.00 |
(85) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 1 | 2 | 1.00 |
(109) The Bonsai Test - Revision 2016 | 2 | 1.00 |
(16) Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 3 | 1.00 |
(25) The Sargasso Test | 3 | 0.96 |
(44) Associative LIMIT | 3 | 0.96 |
(19) Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 4 | 0.95 |
(3) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5 | 4 | 0.93 |
(106) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4 | 3 | 0.88 |
(51) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #1 | 3 | 0.85 |
(2) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3 | 3 | 0.85 |
(27) Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 4 | 0.82 |
(23) Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011 | 6 | 0.80 |
(40) Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008 | 4 | 0.77 |
(110) Cooijmans Intelligence Test 5 | 3 | 0.50 |
(10) Genius Association Test | 4 | 0.41 |
(53) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 | 3 | 0.34 |
(68) Numbers | 3 | 0.32 |
(24) Reason - Revision 2008 | 4 | 0.11 |
(39) Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 3 | -0.18 |
(7) The Final Test | 2 | -1.00 |
(26) Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 2 | -1.00 |
(52) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #2 | 2 | -1.00 |
(79) Association subtest of Long Test For Genius | 2 | -1.00 |
(80) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 2 | -1.00 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.476 (N = 76, weighted sum = 36.19)
Conservatively estimated minimum g loading: 0.69
(Test index) Test name | n | r |
---|---|---|
(214) Epiq Tests | 2 | 1.00 |
(231) Mysterium Entrance Exam | 2 | 1.00 |
(235) Nonverbal Cognitive Performance Examination | 2 | 1.00 |
(246) Sequentia Numerica Form I | 3 | 0.94 |
(242) Unknown and miscellaneous tests | 31 | 0.46 |
(236) International High IQ Society Miscellaneous tests | 4 | 0.36 |
(211) Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version | 3 | 0.32 |
(218) Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.) | 4 | 0.22 |
(201) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales | 3 | -0.48 |
(225) Logima Strictica 36 | 3 | -0.61 |
(234) Strict Logic Sequences Exam I | 2 | -1.00 |
(238) 916 Test | 2 | -1.00 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.315 (N = 61, weighted sum = 19.22)
Please be aware that correlations with these external tests are in most cases affected (depressed, typically) by one or more of the following: (1) Little overlap with the object test because of the much lower ceilings and inherent ceiling effects of the tests used in regular psychology; (2) Candidates reporting scores selectively, for instance only the higher ones while withholding lower ones; (3) Candidates reporting, or having been reported by psychometricians, incorrect scores.
These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.
Type | n | g loading of Advanced Intelligence Test on that type |
---|---|---|
Verbal | 26 | 0.19 |
Numerical | 7 | 0.82 |
Spatial | 7 | 0.95 |
Logical | 4 | 0.33 |
Heterogeneous | 22 | 0.91 |
N = 66
Balanced g loading = 0.64
Country | n | median score |
---|---|---|
India | 2 | 22.0 |
Turkey | 2 | 19.0 |
Thailand | 2 | 13.5 |
Germany | 3 | 13.0 |
Norway | 2 | 13.0 |
Canada | 3 | 12.0 |
France | 2 | 12.0 |
United_States | 6 | 9.0 |
Personalia | n | r |
---|---|---|
Educational level | 13 | 0.52 |
Sex | 74 | 0.30 |
Year of birth | 18 | -0.03 |
Father's educational level | 13 | -0.08 |
Mother's educational level | 13 | -0.15 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 13 | -0.35 |
Disorders (own) | 15 | -0.59 |
In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for both values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.
Raw score | Upward g (N) | Downward g (N) |
---|---|---|
0 | 0.69 (76) | NaN (0) |
7 | 0.69 (76) | NaN (0) |
11.5 | 0.27 (43) | 1.00 (2) |
16 | 0.25 (30) | -0.38 (14) |
20 | 0.00 (8) | 0.71 (56) |
25 | NaN (0) | 0.69 (76) |