Statistics of Mother's educational level

© Paul Cooijmans

Legenda

The educational levels reported by test candidates are encoded as follows:

Scores on Mother's educational level as of 27 March 2025

Contents type: Personal information, observation, or non-cognitive personality test score in numeric form.   

ScoreFrequency
010
124
283
3109
4397
5277
6156
742

Scores by males

n = 961

ScoreFrequency
08
123
273
392
4349
5243
6135
738

Scores by females

n = 135

0 *
1 *
2 **********
3 *****************
4 ************************************************
5 *********************************
6 *********************
7 ****

Correlation of Mother's educational level with other mental ability tests

Test name n rp value
Tests by Brendan Harris (aggregate)60.870.05
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales for Children100.740.03
Kvociento (Bram van Kaathoven)60.680.13
Analogies #170.660.11
California Test of Mental Maturity50.640.19
Stanford-Binet60.610.17
Tests by Mislav Predavec (aggregate)160.570.03
Scholastic Aptitude Test (new)120.510.09
Divine Psychometry (Matthew Scillitani)140.480.08
Scholastic Aptitude Test (old)170.460.07
Cattell Culture Fair Intelligence Test 20-R40.450.44
Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato)500.400.005
916 Test (Laurent Dubois)220.390.08
Logima Strictica 24 (Robert Lato)170.370.13
Ultra Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin)110.370.25
Sigma Test (Melão Hindemburg)220.330.13
Epiq Tests (aggregate)530.320.02
Analogies subtest of Long Test For Genius (Netherlandic)60.300.50
Graduate Management Admission Test40.300.62
Qoymans Automatic Test #1110.280.37
Cattell Culture Fair340.260.13
Bonsai Test170.260.30
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2620.260.04
A Relaxing Test (David Miller)140.250.37
Tests by James Dorsey (aggregate)90.240.48
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.)380.230.15
Gliaweb Recycled Intelligence Test70.230.57
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 1160.230.38
Reason380.220.17
Test For Genius - Revision 2010340.210.24
American College Testing program (from October 1989 onward)100.210.52
Dicing with death190.200.40
Concep-T (Laurent Dubois)90.200.57
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice310.200.28
Sunesis Test (Rudimar Schmitz)40.190.74
F.N.A. (Xavier Jouve)40.180.76
Tests by Theodosis Prousalis (aggregate)140.180.52
International High IQ Society tests (aggregate)540.160.25
The Bonsai Test - Revision 2016730.160.17
Hoeflin Power Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin)80.160.66
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 20041070.150.12
Labyrinthine LIMIT320.150.40
G-test (Nikos Lygeros)90.140.68
Test For Genius - Revision 2004760.140.22
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 20111990.130.06
Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 20101300.120.17
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (raw)260.110.57
Tests by Nikolaos Soulios (aggregate)260.110.60
W-87 (International Society for Philosophical Enquiry)80.100.78
Reason - Revision 20081160.100.28
Mega Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin)100.100.76
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the third degree660.090.46
Long Test For Genius (Netherlandic)50.090.87
Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 20041230.090.36
Cooijmans On-Line Test150.080.76
Short Test For Genius110.080.78
Daedalus Test420.080.62
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the first degree240.070.74
Miscellaneous tests2170.070.32
Psychometric Qrosswords260.060.74
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 32010.060.37
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2010540.060.64
Spatial Insight Test230.060.76
Verbal section of The Marathon Test450.060.68
The Nemesis Test660.050.68
Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test1150.050.60
Tests by Xavier Jouve, other than those listed separately (aggregate)180.040.87
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 20081150.040.68
Tests by Ivan Ivec (aggregate)340.040.84
Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices (I.Q.)50.040.94
De Laatste Test - Herziening 201970.030.94
Tests by Paul Laurent Miranda (aggregate)170.020.92
Numbers530.020.90
The Final Test610.010.92
Psychometrically Activated Grids Acerbate Neuroticism180.010.94
Test For Genius - Revision 2016590.010.92
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #1150.010.97
Laaglandse Aanlegtest - Herziening 201690.010.97
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2016580.000.97
The Test To End All Tests610.000.97
Numerical Insight Test130.001.00
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #41440.001.00
Tests by Greg Grove (aggregate)380.001.00
Titan Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin)21-0.001.00
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales44-0.010.94
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 201681-0.010.92
Strict Logic Sequences Exam I (Jonathan Wai)76-0.010.92
European I.Q. Test8-0.010.97
Isis Test87-0.020.84
Narcissus' last stand35-0.020.90
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version)42-0.030.87
Tickle Tests (tickle.com)5-0.030.94
Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström)56-0.040.78
Space, Time, and Hyperspace - Revision 201683-0.040.71
Queendom tests11-0.050.90
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Paul Cooijmans)71-0.050.66
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5118-0.050.60
Numerical section of The Marathon Test70-0.060.64
Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test68-0.060.64
Test of the Beheaded Man60-0.060.64
A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude48-0.060.66
Space, Time, and Hyperspace55-0.060.64
Graduate Record Examination (prior to October 2001)11-0.070.81
Associative LIMIT81-0.080.50
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4114-0.080.40
Tests by Jason Betts (aggregate)26-0.080.68
Cattell Verbal (also known as Cattell B)8-0.080.81
The Marathon Test41-0.090.57
Genius Association Test114-0.090.34
Strict Logic Sequences Exam II (Jonathan Wai)21-0.090.68
Reflections In Peroxide59-0.090.48
The Alchemist Test (Anas El Husseini)40-0.090.57
The Sargasso Test76-0.090.42
Test of Inductive Reasoning / J.C.T.I. (Xavier Jouve)28-0.110.60
Association subtest of Long Test For Genius38-0.110.50
Association and Analogies (German)5-0.120.81
The Final Test - Revision 201319-0.120.62
Odds21-0.120.57
Cooijmans Intelligence Test 574-0.130.27
Tests by Nicolas Elenas (aggregate)15-0.130.62
Cartoons of Shock48-0.140.34
Qoymans Automatic Test #211-0.140.66
Advanced Intelligence Test (Randy Myers)13-0.150.60
The Smell Test10-0.150.64
Spatial section of The Marathon Test69-0.180.15
Omega Contemplative Items Pool (Tommy Smith)7-0.180.66
Cooijmans On-Line Test - Two-barrelled version36-0.190.27
Tests by Marc-André Nydegger (aggregate)6-0.200.64
Sequentia Numerica Form I (Alexander Herkner)13-0.220.44
Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve)39-0.220.17
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree54-0.220.11
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #215-0.230.40
Chimera High Ability Riddle Test (Bill Bultas)6-0.240.60
Strict Logic Spatial Exam 48 (Jonathan Wai)32-0.270.13
The Hammer Of Test-Hungry - Revision 201318-0.290.24
The Piper's Test22-0.310.15
Words21-0.320.15
Test of Shock and Awe16-0.330.20
Tests by Randy Myers (other than Advanced Intelligence Test)4-0.330.57
Long Test For Genius28-0.350.07
Drenth number series5-0.370.46
Cito-toets12-0.390.19
The Gate6-0.410.37
Gliaweb Raadselachtig Analogieproefwerk9-0.420.25
Only idiots14-0.420.12
The Blue Test (Andres Gomez Emilsson)11-0.430.17
Analogies of Long Test For Genius33-0.430.01
New York High I.Q. Society tests4-0.450.44
The LAW - Letters And Words18-0.470.05
Letters20-0.480.04
Random Feickery (Brandon Feick)9-0.490.16
Tests by Iakovos Koukas (aggregate)10-0.530.12
De Golfstroomtest - Herziening 20196-0.540.24
Qoymans Automatic Test #38-0.540.15
Association subtest of Long Test For Genius (Netherlandic)6-0.560.20
Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery - Armed Forces Qualification Test5-0.600.24
American College Testing program (prior to October 1989)6-0.600.17
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Jonathan Wai)11-0.620.05
Magma Test (Edward Vanhove)4-0.620.28
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the fourth degree4-0.630.28
Low Countries Aptitude Test7-0.640.12
Tests by Arne Andre Gangvik (aggregate)4-0.670.25
De Roskam5-0.720.15
Encephalist - R (Xavier Jouve)6-0.800.07
Evens9-0.820.02
Miller Analogies Test (before 2001; raw)7-0.890.03
Female Intelligence Test5-0.920.07
The Hammer Of Test-Hungry4-0.930.11

Weighted mean of correlations: 0.009 (N = 5837)

Estimated g factor loading: 0.10

Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.

Observation: There is no significant correlation on the whole of Mother's educational level with I.Q. test scores.

Correlation of Mother's educational level with other tests - for females

Test name n rp value
Test of the Beheaded Man40.940.10
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 200440.890.12
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 240.690.24
Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 201040.670.25
Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test40.520.37
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011170.390.12
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version)40.300.60
Miscellaneous tests230.290.17
Associative LIMIT40.280.62
Reason - Revision 200850.170.74
Cartoons of Shock50.130.78
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 200850.120.81
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3140.050.84
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #550.020.97
Genius Association Test6-0.040.92
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #415-0.070.78
Cattell Culture Fair4-0.090.87
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 47-0.380.36
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Paul Cooijmans)8-0.590.12
Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström)4-0.860.13

Weighted mean of correlations: 0.143 (N = 146)

Estimated g factor loading among females: 0.38

Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.

Observation: While the correlation within females is larger as often, this is not significant.

Estimated loadings of Mother's educational level on particular item types

These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.

Typeng loading of Mother's educational level on that type
Verbal1046-0.25
Numerical377-0.02
Spatial5840.17
Logical2390.30
Heterogeneous18950.07

N = 4141

Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.

Balanced g loading = 0.05

National means for Mother's educational level

Country n mean score
Chile36.0
Bulgaria85.8
Cuba35.7
Iran55.4
Argentina75.3
Serbia45.3
Russia55.2
India265.1
Thailand35.0
South_Africa94.9
Romania84.8
Poland154.7
New_Zealand64.7
Philippines64.7
Switzerland84.6
United_States3084.6
Nigeria54.6
Israel74.6
Japan134.5
Canada324.5
United_Kingdom494.5
Greece274.4
Korea_South194.4
Portugal54.4
Singapore54.4
Yugoslavia54.4
France204.3
Malaysia34.3
Sweden604.2
Austria144.2
Australia194.1
China224.1
Czech_Republic44.0
Italy224.0
Norway144.0
Slovenia44.0
Germany773.9
Netherlands823.9
Belgium223.9
Brazil123.8
Finland303.7
Turkey153.7
Mexico73.6
Denmark133.5
Bosnia_and_Herzegovina33.3
Spain252.6
Hong_Kong62.3
Cyprus32.0

Total number of countries: 72

For reasons of privacy, only countries with 3 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the unrounded means, and then alphabetic.

Correlation of Mother's educational level with personal details

Personalia n rp value
Father's educational level10800.59≈ 0
Year of birth10980.230.00000000000003
PSIA Rational - Revision 2007960.170.10
Disorders (own)10960.060.06
PSIA Cruel - Revision 2007960.060.60
PSIA Just - Revision 2007960.010.90
Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes570.010.94
Sex1098-0.000.94
PSIA System factor - Revision 200796-0.000.97
PSIA Rare - Revision 200796-0.010.94
Disorders (parents and siblings)1094-0.010.78
PSIA Cold - Revision 200796-0.010.92
Educational level1098-0.010.74
PSIA Orderly - Revision 200796-0.010.92
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms88-0.040.74
PSIA Introverted - Revision 200796-0.050.62
PSIA True - Revision 200796-0.050.62
PSIA Extreme - Revision 200796-0.060.57
PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 200796-0.060.54
PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 200796-0.070.48
Observed associative horizon38-0.090.60
PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 200796-0.100.34
Observed behaviour95-0.110.30
PSIA Neurotic - Revision 200796-0.120.26
PSIA Antisocial - Revision 200796-0.160.12

Observation: There is an exceedingly significant moderate positive correlation of Father's educational level with Mother's educational level, reflecting assortative mating, one presumes. Virtually the same correlation is seen below for both the female and the male candidates separately, which makes sense given that the assortative mating took place before the candidate (child) was conceived, and can therefore not have been affected by the sex of the candidate. The fact that this correlation is so alike within-sex confirms that it is genuine, and also confirms that the statistic was reported correctly on the whole. The positive correlation with birth year implies that candidates with later birth years have mothers with higher educational levels.

Correlation with personal details of Mother's educational level - within females

Personalia n rp value
Father's educational level1350.620.0000000000008
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms70.590.14
PSIA Rational - Revision 2007100.380.26
Year of birth1350.230.008
Educational level1350.110.18
Disorders (own)1350.110.19
PSIA Neurotic - Revision 2007100.030.92
Disorders (parents and siblings)135-0.060.50
PSIA Cold - Revision 200710-0.180.60
PSIA Orderly - Revision 200710-0.190.57
PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 200710-0.250.46
Observed associative horizon5-0.250.62
PSIA Rare - Revision 200710-0.270.42
PSIA Just - Revision 200710-0.280.38
PSIA Cruel - Revision 200710-0.290.38
PSIA System factor - Revision 200710-0.290.38
PSIA Extreme - Revision 200710-0.300.37
Observed behaviour8-0.320.40
PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 200710-0.380.26
PSIA True - Revision 200710-0.400.24
PSIA Antisocial - Revision 200710-0.430.20
PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 200710-0.440.18
PSIA Introverted - Revision 200710-0.550.10

Correlation with personal details of Mother's educational level - within males

Personalia n rp value
Father's educational level9430.59≈ 0
Year of birth9610.240.0000000000003
PSIA Rational - Revision 2007860.140.20
Disorders (own)9590.050.14
PSIA Cruel - Revision 2007860.040.71
PSIA Rare - Revision 2007860.010.92
Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes570.010.94
PSIA Orderly - Revision 2007860.000.97
Disorders (parents and siblings)957-0.000.92
PSIA True - Revision 200786-0.010.94
PSIA Just - Revision 200786-0.010.92
PSIA Introverted - Revision 200786-0.010.90
PSIA System factor - Revision 200786-0.020.84
PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 200786-0.020.84
Educational level961-0.030.42
PSIA Cold - Revision 200786-0.030.78
PSIA Extreme - Revision 200786-0.030.74
PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 200786-0.040.68
Observed associative horizon33-0.060.74
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms81-0.090.44
PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 200786-0.110.34
PSIA Neurotic - Revision 200786-0.110.28
Observed behaviour87-0.120.25
PSIA Antisocial - Revision 200786-0.180.10

Estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges

The goal of estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for these values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.

Below 1st quartile (raw 4.0)0.09 (N = 3634)
Below median (raw 4.0)0.09 (N = 3634)
Above median (raw 4.0)-0.12 (N = 4411)
Above 3rd quartile (raw 5.0)-0.09 (N = 2114)

Remark: These are not significant.

Conclusions

  1. There is, on the whole, virtually zero correlation of Mother's educational level with candidate's high-range I.Q. test scores;
  2. Within females, however, there is a small positive correlation, but not significant;
  3. Only in the lowest ranges of Mother's educational level there seems to be a somewhat higher positive correlation with I.Q.;
  4. There is a significant moderate positive correlation of Father's educational level with Mother's educational level, reflecting assortative mating.

General observations

After seeing the statistics of candidate's, mother's, and father's educational levels, the following general observations can be made:

  1. There are small positive to near-zero correlations of high-range I.Q. scores with the three indicators of educational level;
  2. Only for the lowest few educational levels is the correlation somewhat larger;
  3. Within female candidates, the correlations of I.Q. scores with the three indicators of educational level are higher than within male candidates; given that females score a bit lower than males on high-range tests, these higher correlations are consistent with the phenomenon that the correlation of I.Q. with educational level is higher over the full range than in the high range;
  4. The correlations with Mother's educational level are lower than those with Father's educational level.

Disclaimer

These reports are based exclusively on statistics of high-range intelligence tests. Over the full range of I.Q. and the general population, the correlations of I.Q. scores with the indicators of educational level are known to be much higher than reported here. Likely, this difference has to do with phenomena like attenuation due to restriction of range, and Spearman's "law of diminishing returns" regarding g.