This is a German version of the verbal section of the Test For Genius.
0 | * |
10 | ** |
13 | * |
15 | * |
16 | * |
Test name | n | r |
---|---|---|
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 3 | 1.00 |
Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 3 | 1.00 |
Spatial section of The Marathon Test | 3 | 0.99 |
Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 4 | 0.99 |
Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test | 3 | 0.98 |
The Sargasso Test | 3 | 0.98 |
Genius Association Test | 3 | 0.98 |
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 3 | 0.97 |
Numerical section of The Marathon Test | 3 | 0.97 |
Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 4 | 0.97 |
The Test To End All Tests | 3 | 0.96 |
Space, Time, and Hyperspace - Revision 2016 | 3 | 0.95 |
Associative LIMIT | 3 | 0.95 |
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 4 | 0.94 |
Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 4 | 0.86 |
Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 3 | 0.78 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.953 (N = 52, weighted sum = 50)
Estimated g factor loading: 0.98
Because the amount of data in the above table (correlations per test) is relatively small, the test has actually been normed using the compound variable of all known scores on other tests (including tests with only one pair). This concerns 133 pairs with a compound correlation of .84, as reported under the norm table.
These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.
Type | n | g loading of Association and Analogies (German) on that type |
---|---|---|
Verbal | 13 | 0.98 |
Numerical | 6 | 0.93 |
Spatial | 14 | 0.97 |
Heterogeneous | 3 | 0.99 |
N = 36
Balanced g loading = 0.97
Country | n | median score |
---|---|---|
Germany | 3 | 10.0 |
Correlation of this test with national average I.Q.'s published by Lynn and Vanhanen:
Personalia | n | r |
---|---|---|
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 4 | 0.87 |
Educational level | 5 | 0.39 |
Father's educational level | 5 | 0.00 |
Mother's educational level | 5 | -0.12 |
Year of birth | 6 | -0.22 |
Disorders (own) | 5 | -0.61 |
Age class | n | Median score |
---|---|---|
50 to 54 | 1 | 10.0 |
30 to 34 | 2 | 14.5 |
25 to 29 | 1 | 15.0 |
22 to 24 | 1 | 0.0 |
20 or 21 | 1 | 10.0 |
N = 6
Year taken | n | median score |
---|---|---|
2004 | 4 | 10.0 |
2005 | 2 | 15.5 |
ryear taken × median score = 1.00 (N = 6)
Item statistics are not published as that would help candidates. To detect bad items, answers and comments from candidates are studied, as well as, for each problem, the correlation with total score on the remaining problems (item-rest correlation) and the proportion of candidates getting it wrong (hardness of the item). Possible bad items are revised, replaced, or removed, possibly resulting in a revised version of the test.