15 | * |
59 | * |
60 | * |
65 | * |
68 | * |
72 | * |
73 | * |
74 | ** |
75 | * |
76 | * |
77 | * |
78 | *** |
79 | **** |
(Test index) Test name | n | r |
---|---|---|
(33) Problems In Gentle Slopes of the first degree | 3 | 0.99 |
(68) Numbers | 3 | 0.99 |
(29) Words | 19 | 0.99 |
(15) Letters | 19 | 0.98 |
(44) Associative LIMIT | 4 | 0.98 |
(48) Narcissus' last stand | 3 | 0.94 |
(30) Verbal section of The Marathon Test | 4 | 0.88 |
(40) Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008 | 7 | 0.87 |
(43) Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 5 | 0.85 |
(36) Reflections In Peroxide | 3 | 0.81 |
(42) The Marathon Test | 3 | 0.80 |
(26) Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 8 | 0.73 |
(0) Test of the Beheaded Man | 4 | 0.66 |
(3) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5 | 7 | 0.65 |
(24) Reason - Revision 2008 | 7 | 0.63 |
(16) Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 5 | 0.57 |
(35) Intelligence Quantifier by assessment | 7 | 0.56 |
(31) Numerical section of The Marathon Test | 3 | 0.50 |
(1) Cartoons of Shock | 5 | 0.49 |
(19) Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 5 | 0.48 |
(32) Spatial section of The Marathon Test | 3 | 0.45 |
(7) The Final Test | 5 | 0.44 |
(18) The Nemesis Test | 5 | 0.41 |
(25) The Sargasso Test | 5 | 0.41 |
(2) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3 | 6 | 0.40 |
(23) Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011 | 6 | 0.39 |
(39) Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 5 | 0.38 |
(11) Isis Test | 6 | 0.35 |
(27) Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 7 | 0.35 |
(10) Genius Association Test | 7 | 0.34 |
(28) The Test To End All Tests | 6 | 0.18 |
(103) Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree | 4 | 0.12 |
(4) A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude | 4 | -0.08 |
(80) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 4 | -0.29 |
(79) Association subtest of Long Test For Genius | 4 | -0.36 |
(106) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4 | 4 | -0.41 |
(66) Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 3 | -0.61 |
(53) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 | 3 | -0.65 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.540
Conservatively estimated minimum g loading: 0.73
(Test index) Test name | n | r |
---|---|---|
(242) Unknown and miscellaneous tests | 6 | 0.45 |
(225) Logima Strictica 36 | 3 | 0.41 |
(235) Nonverbal Cognitive Performance Examination | 3 | 0.16 |
(234) Strict Logic Sequences Exam I | 4 | 0.16 |
(236) International High IQ Society Miscellaneous tests | 3 | -0.30 |
(246) Sequentia Numerica Form I | 4 | -0.80 |
(248) Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version) | 3 | -0.85 |
Weighted average of correlations: -0.061
Please be aware that correlations with these external tests are in most cases affected (depressed, typically) by one or more of the following: (1) Little overlap with the object test because of the much lower ceilings and inherent ceiling effects of the tests used in regular psychology; (2) Candidates reporting scores selectively, for instance only the higher ones while withholding lower ones; (3) Candidates reporting, or having been reported by psychometricians, incorrect scores.
These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.
Type | g loading of The LAW - Letters And Words on that type |
---|---|
Verbal | 0.78 |
Numerical | 0.79 |
Spatial | 0.66 |
Logical | 0.79 |
Heterogeneous | 0.60 |
Balanced g loading = 0.73
Country | n | median score |
---|---|---|
United_States | 8 | 73.5 |
Greece | 2 | 68.0 |
Correlation of this test with national average I.Q.'s published by Lynn and Vanhanen:
Personalia | n | r |
---|---|---|
P.S.I.A. Aspergoid | 6 | 0.85 |
P.S.I.A. Introverted | 6 | 0.81 |
P.S.I.A. Extreme | 6 | 0.81 |
P.S.I.A. Rare | 6 | 0.72 |
P.S.I.A. Deviance factor | 8 | 0.67 |
P.S.I.A. Rational | 6 | 0.47 |
P.S.I.A. System factor | 5 | 0.45 |
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 6 | 0.44 |
P.S.I.A. Cold | 6 | 0.40 |
P.S.I.A. Just | 6 | 0.25 |
P.S.I.A. Neurotic | 6 | 0.25 |
P.S.I.A. True | 6 | 0.23 |
Educational level | 19 | 0.16 |
Sex | 19 | 0.11 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 19 | 0.08 |
P.S.I.A. Ethics factor | 8 | 0.07 |
P.S.I.A. Antisocial | 6 | -0.04 |
Observed associative horizon | 3 | -0.11 |
Year of birth | 19 | -0.11 |
P.S.I.A. Orderly | 6 | -0.16 |
P.S.I.A. Cruel | 6 | -0.24 |
Father's educational level | 17 | -0.32 |
Disorders (own) | 19 | -0.38 |
Mother's educational level | 18 | -0.47 |
Candidate's self-estimated I.Q. | 5 | -0.55 |
In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for both values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.
Raw score | Upward g (n) | Downward g (n) |
---|---|---|
0 | 0.73 (211) | NaN (0) |
50 | 0.69 (183) | NaN (0) |
65 | 0.40 (135) | 0.78 (14) |
70 | 0.40 (127) | 0.81 (16) |
75 | 0.17 (81) | 0.78 (69) |
76 | 0.34 (72) | 0.77 (116) |
77 | 0.63 (42) | 0.73 (128) |
78 | 0.60 (32) | 0.72 (186) |
79 | NaN (0) | 0.73 (211) |
80 | NaN (0) | 0.73 (211) |
From the known reliabilities of the subtests Letters and Words, the reliability of the LAW has been computed using a variant of the Spearman-Brown formula: