This is the statistical report of a personality inventory relating to Aspergoid features in intelligent adults.
Contents type: Personal information, observation, or non-cognitive personality test score in numeric form. Period: 2000-present
1 | ** |
2 | ** |
3 | ** |
4 | ***** |
5 | *** |
6 | **** |
7 | ******* |
8 | **** |
9 | ***** |
10 | ****** |
11 | **** |
12 | * |
13 | *** |
14 | ** |
15 | ***** |
16 | *** |
17 | *** |
18 | **** |
19 | *** |
20 | ** |
21 | ********* |
22 | ******** |
23 | ******** |
24 | ******** |
25 | **** |
26 | *** |
27 | ****** |
28 | ******* |
29 | *********** |
30 | *********** |
31 | **** |
32 | ******* |
33 | **** |
34 | ******** |
35 | ******* |
36 | ****** |
37 | ***** |
38 | ***** |
39 | * |
40 | ***** |
41 | *** |
42 | ** |
43 | * |
44 | * |
45 | * |
46 | ** |
47 | * |
48 | * |
50 | * |
54 | * |
n = 164
1 | ** |
2 | ** |
3 | ** |
4 | ***** |
5 | ** |
6 | **** |
7 | ****** |
8 | **** |
9 | **** |
10 | ****** |
11 | **** |
12 | * |
13 | ** |
14 | * |
15 | ***** |
16 | ** |
17 | *** |
18 | ** |
19 | * |
20 | * |
21 | ****** |
22 | ******* |
23 | ******* |
24 | ******* |
25 | *** |
26 | *** |
27 | ***** |
28 | ***** |
29 | ***** |
30 | ******** |
31 | * |
32 | **** |
33 | **** |
34 | ****** |
35 | ****** |
36 | *** |
37 | ***** |
38 | *** |
40 | **** |
41 | *** |
42 | ** |
43 | * |
44 | * |
45 | * |
46 | ** |
47 | * |
48 | * |
50 | * |
n = 44
5 | * |
7 | * |
9 | * |
13 | * |
14 | * |
16 | * |
18 | ** |
19 | * |
20 | * |
21 | *** |
22 | * |
23 | * |
24 | * |
25 | * |
27 | * |
28 | ** |
29 | ****** |
30 | *** |
31 | *** |
32 | *** |
34 | ** |
35 | * |
36 | *** |
38 | ** |
54 | * |
Test name | n | r |
---|---|---|
Letters | 8 | 0.89 |
Words | 9 | 0.75 |
Short Test For Genius | 4 | 0.62 |
Cattell Culture Fair | 8 | 0.61 |
Graduate Record Examination (prior to October 2001) | 4 | 0.59 |
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice | 7 | 0.57 |
The LAW - Letters And Words | 7 | 0.53 |
Cartoons of Shock | 12 | 0.49 |
Psychometric Qrosswords | 12 | 0.48 |
Verbal section of The Marathon Test | 9 | 0.44 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 1 | 6 | 0.40 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 16 | 0.38 |
Tests by Greg Grove (aggregate) | 15 | 0.37 |
Strict Logic Spatial Exam 48 (Jonathan Wai) | 5 | 0.35 |
Numbers | 11 | 0.30 |
The Marathon Test | 8 | 0.29 |
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version) | 10 | 0.28 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #2 | 7 | 0.28 |
Tests by Mislav Predavec (aggregate) | 8 | 0.27 |
Strict Logic Sequences Exam I (Jonathan Wai) | 17 | 0.25 |
The Smell Test | 5 | 0.25 |
Qoymans Automatic Test #1 | 6 | 0.23 |
The Final Test | 22 | 0.22 |
The Test To End All Tests | 25 | 0.22 |
The Bonsai Test - Revision 2016 | 17 | 0.20 |
Qoymans Automatic Test #2 | 7 | 0.19 |
Space, Time, and Hyperspace - Revision 2016 | 19 | 0.19 |
European I.Q. Test | 6 | 0.18 |
Narcissus' last stand | 14 | 0.17 |
Bonsai Test | 4 | 0.14 |
Tests by Ivan Ivec (aggregate) | 11 | 0.13 |
Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato) | 17 | 0.11 |
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 18 | 0.10 |
Random Feickery (Brandon Feick) | 4 | 0.09 |
Tests by Jason Betts (aggregate) | 4 | 0.08 |
International High IQ Society tests (aggregate) | 17 | 0.08 |
Test of Inductive Reasoning / J.C.T.I. (Xavier Jouve) | 6 | 0.07 |
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 15 | 0.06 |
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 24 | 0.05 |
A Relaxing Test (David Miller) | 6 | 0.05 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4 | 18 | 0.05 |
Isis Test | 21 | 0.04 |
De Golfstroomtest - Herziening 2019 | 4 | 0.04 |
Qoymans Automatic Test #3 | 4 | 0.03 |
Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 15 | 0.01 |
A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude | 16 | 0.01 |
The Piper's Test | 10 | -0.01 |
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (raw) | 5 | -0.01 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5 | 29 | -0.02 |
Reflections In Peroxide | 18 | -0.02 |
Logima Strictica 24 (Robert Lato) | 6 | -0.05 |
Cooijmans On-Line Test - Two-barrelled version | 12 | -0.06 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 23 | -0.08 |
Only idiots | 5 | -0.08 |
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales | 19 | -0.08 |
The Hammer Of Test-Hungry - Revision 2013 | 7 | -0.09 |
Psychometrically Activated Grids Acerbate Neuroticism | 5 | -0.12 |
Spatial Insight Test | 7 | -0.13 |
De Laatste Test - Herziening 2019 | 5 | -0.13 |
Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 20 | -0.14 |
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008 | 29 | -0.15 |
Analogies #1 | 6 | -0.16 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3 | 27 | -0.24 |
Titan Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 11 | -0.24 |
Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 7 | -0.24 |
The Sargasso Test | 20 | -0.24 |
Reason - Revision 2008 | 29 | -0.24 |
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the third degree | 17 | -0.24 |
Tests by Nikolaos Soulios (aggregate) | 5 | -0.25 |
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree | 11 | -0.25 |
The Alchemist Test (Anas El Husseini) | 9 | -0.26 |
Genius Association Test | 29 | -0.27 |
Miscellaneous tests | 62 | -0.27 |
The Final Test - Revision 2013 | 8 | -0.28 |
Space, Time, and Hyperspace | 31 | -0.28 |
Spatial section of The Marathon Test | 14 | -0.28 |
Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 26 | -0.28 |
Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 27 | -0.29 |
Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 25 | -0.30 |
Numerical section of The Marathon Test | 14 | -0.31 |
Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test | 14 | -0.31 |
Associative LIMIT | 20 | -0.32 |
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011 | 21 | -0.32 |
Dicing with death | 9 | -0.32 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test 5 | 17 | -0.32 |
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the first degree | 8 | -0.33 |
Mega Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 8 | -0.33 |
Analogies of Long Test For Genius | 19 | -0.36 |
Reason | 9 | -0.36 |
Tests by Nicolas Elenas (aggregate) | 8 | -0.37 |
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.) | 13 | -0.38 |
Queendom tests | 5 | -0.38 |
Test of the Beheaded Man | 17 | -0.39 |
Tests by Xavier Jouve, other than those listed separately (aggregate) | 5 | -0.40 |
Daedalus Test | 10 | -0.40 |
The Nemesis Test | 14 | -0.42 |
Tests by Theodosis Prousalis (aggregate) | 5 | -0.43 |
Long Test For Genius | 17 | -0.44 |
Association subtest of Long Test For Genius | 21 | -0.45 |
Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve) | 14 | -0.46 |
916 Test (Laurent Dubois) | 4 | -0.47 |
Labyrinthine LIMIT | 8 | -0.48 |
Scholastic Aptitude Test (old) | 4 | -0.50 |
Ultra Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 5 | -0.50 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Jonathan Wai) | 8 | -0.51 |
Epiq Tests (aggregate) | 9 | -0.51 |
Test of Shock and Awe | 9 | -0.51 |
Strict Logic Sequences Exam II (Jonathan Wai) | 4 | -0.58 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #1 | 10 | -0.60 |
Sigma Test (Melão Hindemburg) | 11 | -0.60 |
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 9 | -0.64 |
Divine Psychometry (Matthew Scillitani) | 6 | -0.67 |
Odds | 6 | -0.69 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Paul Cooijmans) | 11 | -0.83 |
Weighted mean of correlations: -0.108 (N = 1444)
Estimated g factor loading: -0.33
Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.
Remark: The low negative g loading of indicators of deviance and disorder has been observed consistently since the early 2000s.
These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.
Type | n | g loading of Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms on that type |
---|---|---|
Verbal | 302 | -0.15 |
Numerical | 74 | -0.33 |
Spatial | 151 | -0.38 |
Logical | 54 | -0.51 |
Heterogeneous | 452 | -0.35 |
N = 1033
Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.
Balanced g loading = -0.35
Country | n | median score |
---|---|---|
Australia | 5 | 35.0 |
United_States | 59 | 29.0 |
Netherlands | 12 | 26.5 |
Canada | 8 | 25.5 |
United_Kingdom | 8 | 22.0 |
Greece | 3 | 21.0 |
Belgium | 4 | 20.5 |
Finland | 6 | 19.5 |
Norway | 3 | 18.0 |
Sweden | 7 | 15.0 |
France | 3 | 14.0 |
For reasons of privacy, only countries with 3 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the medians, and then alphabetic.
Personalia | n | r |
---|---|---|
PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 39 | 0.62 |
PSIA Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 39 | 0.58 |
PSIA Cold - Revision 2007 | 39 | 0.46 |
PSIA Introverted - Revision 2007 | 39 | 0.46 |
Disorders (own) | 125 | 0.43 |
PSIA Rare - Revision 2007 | 39 | 0.42 |
PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 39 | 0.38 |
PSIA System factor - Revision 2007 | 39 | 0.33 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 104 | 0.28 |
PSIA Extreme - Revision 2007 | 39 | 0.22 |
Observed associative horizon | 14 | 0.22 |
PSIA Cruel - Revision 2007 | 39 | 0.21 |
Year of birth | 185 | 0.19 |
PSIA Just - Revision 2007 | 39 | 0.17 |
PSIA True - Revision 2007 | 39 | 0.10 |
PSIA Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 39 | 0.07 |
PSIA Orderly - Revision 2007 | 39 | 0.03 |
PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 39 | -0.02 |
Mother's educational level | 88 | -0.04 |
PSIA Rational - Revision 2007 | 39 | -0.05 |
Sex | 208 | -0.11 |
Father's educational level | 85 | -0.16 |
Observed behaviour | 35 | -0.21 |
Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes | 39 | -0.28 |
Educational level | 110 | -0.32 |
Remark: The correlation with disorders is ultimately the validity of this test.
Personalia | n | r |
---|---|---|
Disorders (own) | 14 | 0.80 |
Mother's educational level | 7 | 0.59 |
Father's educational level | 7 | 0.29 |
Year of birth | 32 | 0.16 |
Educational level | 12 | 0.08 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 10 | 0.02 |
Personalia | n | r |
---|---|---|
PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 35 | 0.60 |
PSIA Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 35 | 0.60 |
PSIA Introverted - Revision 2007 | 35 | 0.50 |
PSIA Cold - Revision 2007 | 35 | 0.49 |
Disorders (own) | 108 | 0.40 |
PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 35 | 0.39 |
PSIA Rare - Revision 2007 | 35 | 0.36 |
PSIA System factor - Revision 2007 | 35 | 0.34 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 94 | 0.28 |
Year of birth | 151 | 0.25 |
PSIA Extreme - Revision 2007 | 35 | 0.25 |
PSIA Cruel - Revision 2007 | 35 | 0.21 |
PSIA Just - Revision 2007 | 35 | 0.18 |
Observed associative horizon | 10 | 0.07 |
PSIA True - Revision 2007 | 35 | 0.07 |
PSIA Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 35 | 0.01 |
PSIA Orderly - Revision 2007 | 35 | -0.00 |
PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 35 | -0.04 |
PSIA Rational - Revision 2007 | 35 | -0.05 |
Mother's educational level | 81 | -0.09 |
Father's educational level | 78 | -0.21 |
Observed behaviour | 30 | -0.29 |
Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes | 38 | -0.30 |
Educational level | 98 | -0.37 |
In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for these values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.
Below 1st quartile (raw 15.0) | 0.41 (433) |
---|---|
Below median (raw 25.0) | 0.41 (784) |
Above median (raw 25.0) | -0.23 (638) |
Above 3rd quartile (raw 33.0) | -0.47 (364) |
Notice: The g loading is positive below the median and becomes negative above, suggesting that the negative correlation of deviance and disorder with intelligence occurs where deviance is high; that it is the more serious levels of disorder that depress intelligence.
The below statistics are based on a smaller sample (n = 60) from the year 2009, for which the internal data (item scores) were recorded. Recently, GAIA has commenced recording internal data again.
Remark: This reliability is remarkably high for a non-cognitive personality test.
Age class | n | Median score |
---|---|---|
70 to 74 | 1 | 20.0 |
65 to 69 | 1 | 7.0 |
60 to 64 | 1 | 21.0 |
55 to 59 | 4 | 25.0 |
50 to 54 | 8 | 15.0 |
45 to 49 | 10 | 22.0 |
40 to 44 | 4 | 31.0 |
35 to 39 | 6 | 27.0 |
30 to 34 | 11 | 29.0 |
25 to 29 | 7 | 26.0 |
22 to 24 | 4 | 24.0 |
20 or 21 | 1 | 33.0 |
N = 58
Age class | n | Median raw |
---|---|---|
70 to 74 | 1 | 20.0 |
60 to 64 | 1 | 21.0 |
55 to 59 | 1 | 22.0 |
45 to 49 | 4 | 22.0 |
40 to 44 | 2 | 31.0 |
35 to 39 | 1 | 30.0 |
30 to 34 | 3 | 29.0 |
25 to 29 | 2 | 28.5 |
22 to 24 | 2 | 25.0 |
N = 17
Age class | n | Median raw |
---|---|---|
65 to 69 | 1 | 7.0 |
55 to 59 | 3 | 26.0 |
50 to 54 | 8 | 15.0 |
45 to 49 | 6 | 24.0 |
40 to 44 | 2 | 22.5 |
35 to 39 | 5 | 27.0 |
30 to 34 | 8 | 29.0 |
25 to 29 | 5 | 24.0 |
22 to 24 | 2 | 24.0 |
20 or 21 | 1 | 33.0 |
N = 41
Year taken | n | Median score |
---|---|---|
2009 | 60 | 25.5 |
N = 60
r = point-biserial correlation of that item with the combined score over the rest of the items.
Item # | Hardness (q) | r |
---|---|---|
1 | 0.48 | 0.22 |
2 | 0.47 | 0.16 |
3 | 0.47 | 0.48 |
4 | 0.55 | 0.31 |
5 | 0.52 | 0.40 |
6 | 0.57 | 0.36 |
7 | 0.48 | 0.41 |
8 | 0.18 | 0.36 |
9 | 0.35 | 0.49 |
10 | 0.37 | 0.30 |
11 | 0.58 | 0.27 |
12 | 0.70 | 0.27 |
13 | 0.22 | 0.60 |
14 | 0.38 | 0.22 |
15 | 0.70 | -0.08 |
16 | 0.82 | 0.32 |
17 | 0.90 | 0.16 |
18 | 0.77 | 0.30 |
19 | 0.55 | 0.23 |
20 | 0.55 | 0.53 |
21 | 0.43 | 0.24 |
22 | 0.47 | 0.43 |
23 | 0.32 | 0.54 |
24 | 0.55 | 0.19 |
25 | 0.37 | 0.38 |
26 | 0.63 | 0.25 |
27 | 0.38 | 0.06 |
28 | 0.80 | 0.14 |
29 | 0.32 | 0.60 |
30 | 0.57 | 0.34 |
31 | 0.97 | 0.24 |
32 | 0.82 | 0.16 |
33 | 0.72 | 0.33 |
34 | 0.20 | 0.23 |
35 | 0.83 | 0.31 |
36 | 0.65 | 0.27 |
37 | 0.28 | 0.53 |
38 | 0.55 | 0.40 |
39 | 0.72 | 0.22 |
40 | 0.83 | 0.18 |
41 | 0.78 | 0.18 |
42 | 0.67 | 0.45 |
43 | 0.68 | 0.40 |
44 | 0.25 | 0.44 |
45 | 0.63 | 0.46 |
46 | 0.93 | 0.23 |
47 | 0.32 | 0.45 |
48 | 0.47 | 0.44 |
49 | 0.88 | 0.15 |
50 | 0.93 | 0.19 |
51 | 0.92 | 0.20 |
52 | 0.43 | 0.47 |
53 | 0.45 | 0.17 |
54 | 0.37 | 0.26 |