This is the statistical report of a personality inventory relating to Aspergoid features in intelligent adults.
Note: The t-scores, with mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, are based on a recent sample (year 2021) and anchored to the P.S.I.A. Aspergoid scale (original version). Therefore, these t-scores reflect where one stands among intelligent adults in general, and not just among those taking this test, who (the latter) form a group pre-selected for interest in Asperger syndrome and have considerably higher scores on average (about a standard deviation higher).
GAIA | t-score |
---|---|
0 | 38 |
1 | 39 |
2 | 40 |
3 | 41 |
4 | 42 |
5 | 43 |
6 | 44 |
7 | 45 |
8 | 45 |
9 | 46 |
10 | 47 |
11 | 48 |
12 | 49 |
13 | 50 |
14 | 51 |
15 | 52 |
16 | 53 |
17 | 54 |
18 | 55 |
19 | 55 |
20 | 56 |
21 | 57 |
22 | 58 |
23 | 59 |
24 | 60 |
25 | 61 |
26 | 62 |
27 | 63 |
28 | 64 |
29 | 65 |
30 | 65 |
31 | 66 |
32 | 67 |
33 | 68 |
34 | 69 |
35 | 70 |
36 | 71 |
37 | 72 |
38 | 73 |
39 | 74 |
40 | 75 |
41 | 75 |
42 | 76 |
43 | 77 |
44 | 78 |
45 | 79 |
46 | 80 |
47 | 81 |
48 | 82 |
49 | 83 |
50 | 84 |
51 | 85 |
52 | 85 |
53 | 86 |
54 | 87 |
Note: These scores are from candidates who chose to take this test, probably from an interest in Asperger syndrome, and their scores are higher on average than those of a more general group of intelligent adults would be - see above t-scores.
1 | * |
2 | ** |
3 | ** |
4 | **** |
5 | *** |
6 | **** |
7 | ***** |
8 | **** |
9 | ***** |
10 | ****** |
11 | **** |
12 | * |
13 | *** |
14 | ** |
15 | ***** |
16 | *** |
17 | * |
18 | **** |
19 | *** |
20 | ** |
21 | ********* |
22 | ******* |
23 | ******** |
24 | ********* |
25 | **** |
26 | **** |
27 | ***** |
28 | ****** |
29 | *********** |
30 | *********** |
31 | **** |
32 | ***** |
33 | **** |
34 | ******* |
35 | ******* |
36 | **** |
37 | **** |
38 | ***** |
39 | * |
40 | ***** |
41 | *** |
42 | * |
43 | * |
44 | * |
45 | * |
46 | * |
47 | * |
48 | * |
50 | * |
54 | * |
n = 151
1 | * |
2 | ** |
3 | ** |
4 | **** |
5 | ** |
6 | **** |
7 | ***** |
8 | **** |
9 | **** |
10 | ****** |
11 | **** |
12 | * |
13 | ** |
14 | * |
15 | ***** |
16 | ** |
17 | * |
18 | ** |
19 | * |
20 | * |
21 | ****** |
22 | ****** |
23 | ******* |
24 | ******** |
25 | *** |
26 | **** |
27 | **** |
28 | **** |
29 | ***** |
30 | ******** |
31 | * |
32 | *** |
33 | **** |
34 | ***** |
35 | ****** |
36 | * |
37 | **** |
38 | *** |
40 | **** |
41 | *** |
42 | * |
43 | * |
44 | * |
45 | * |
46 | * |
47 | * |
48 | * |
50 | * |
n = 42
5 | * |
9 | * |
13 | * |
14 | * |
16 | * |
18 | ** |
19 | * |
20 | * |
21 | *** |
22 | * |
23 | * |
24 | * |
25 | * |
27 | * |
28 | ** |
29 | ****** |
30 | *** |
31 | *** |
32 | ** |
34 | ** |
35 | * |
36 | *** |
38 | ** |
54 | * |
(Test index) Test name | n | r |
---|---|---|
(15) Letters | 8 | 0.89 |
(29) Words | 9 | 0.75 |
(108) Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 8 | 0.72 |
(56) Short Test For Genius | 4 | 0.62 |
(62) Reason Behind Multiple-Choice | 7 | 0.57 |
(41) The LAW - Letters And Words | 7 | 0.53 |
(30) Verbal section of The Marathon Test | 7 | 0.51 |
(1) Cartoons of Shock | 12 | 0.49 |
(111) Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 8 | 0.48 |
(52) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #2 | 6 | 0.44 |
(85) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 1 | 6 | 0.40 |
(105) Space, Time, and Hyperspace - Revision 2016 | 10 | 0.39 |
(87) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 16 | 0.38 |
(21) Psychometric Qrosswords | 9 | 0.37 |
(112) Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 9 | 0.30 |
(68) Numbers | 11 | 0.30 |
(116) Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version) | 10 | 0.28 |
(72) Qoymans Automatic Test #1 | 6 | 0.23 |
(42) The Marathon Test | 7 | 0.22 |
(7) The Final Test | 22 | 0.22 |
(106) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4 | 12 | 0.21 |
(50) Qoymans Automatic Test #2 | 7 | 0.19 |
(84) Bonsai Test | 4 | 0.14 |
(48) Narcissus' last stand | 10 | 0.13 |
(28) The Test To End All Tests | 21 | 0.12 |
(3) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5 | 22 | 0.10 |
(11) Isis Test | 18 | 0.07 |
(114) Dicing with death | 7 | 0.07 |
(26) Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 24 | 0.05 |
(107) The Alchemist Test | 6 | 0.04 |
(73) Qoymans Automatic Test #3 | 4 | 0.03 |
(109) The Bonsai Test - Revision 2016 | 6 | 0.01 |
(113) The Piper's Test | 5 | -0.04 |
(4) A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude | 14 | -0.07 |
(80) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 23 | -0.08 |
(36) Reflections In Peroxide | 10 | -0.09 |
(40) Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008 | 22 | -0.09 |
(35) Intelligence Quantifier by assessment | 32 | -0.10 |
(32) Spatial section of The Marathon Test | 9 | -0.11 |
(45) Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test | 9 | -0.13 |
(103) Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree | 7 | -0.13 |
(55) Spatial Insight Test | 7 | -0.14 |
(66) Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 20 | -0.14 |
(31) Numerical section of The Marathon Test | 9 | -0.14 |
(77) Analogies #1 | 6 | -0.16 |
(33) Problems In Gentle Slopes of the first degree | 7 | -0.16 |
(16) Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 24 | -0.16 |
(2) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3 | 20 | -0.17 |
(117) The Hammer Of Test-Hungry - Revision 2013 | 7 | -0.17 |
(12) Cooijmans On-Line Test - Two-barrelled version | 10 | -0.23 |
(43) Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 7 | -0.24 |
(10) Genius Association Test | 28 | -0.25 |
(24) Reason - Revision 2008 | 21 | -0.25 |
(25) The Sargasso Test | 12 | -0.27 |
(23) Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011 | 17 | -0.27 |
(110) Cooijmans Intelligence Test 5 | 11 | -0.28 |
(44) Associative LIMIT | 17 | -0.28 |
(57) Space, Time, and Hyperspace | 31 | -0.28 |
(27) Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 25 | -0.30 |
(37) Problems In Gentle Slopes of the third degree | 9 | -0.32 |
(104) The Final Test - Revision 2013 | 8 | -0.32 |
(0) Test of the Beheaded Man | 12 | -0.35 |
(75) Analogies of Long Test For Genius | 19 | -0.36 |
(82) Reason | 9 | -0.36 |
(19) Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 17 | -0.36 |
(63) Long Test For Genius | 17 | -0.44 |
(79) Association subtest of Long Test For Genius | 21 | -0.45 |
(47) Psychometrically Activated Grids Acerbate Neuroticism | 4 | -0.48 |
(54) Test of Shock and Awe | 9 | -0.51 |
(46) Labyrinthine LIMIT | 5 | -0.58 |
(18) The Nemesis Test | 11 | -0.63 |
(39) Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 9 | -0.64 |
(5) Daedalus Test | 8 | -0.66 |
(69) Odds | 6 | -0.69 |
(51) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #1 | 8 | -0.69 |
(53) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 | 19 | -0.75 |
Weighted average of correlations: -0.084 (N = 924, weighted sum = -78.07)
Conservatively estimated minimum g loading: -0.29
(Test index) Test name | n | r |
---|---|---|
(240) Strict Logic Spatial Exam 48 | 4 | 0.70 |
(220) Cattell Culture Fair | 8 | 0.61 |
(234) Strict Logic Sequences Exam I | 16 | 0.32 |
(231) Mysterium Entrance Exam | 15 | 0.32 |
(226) Logima Strictica 24 | 6 | 0.20 |
(201) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales | 15 | 0.18 |
(225) Logima Strictica 36 | 17 | 0.16 |
(236) International High IQ Society Miscellaneous tests | 16 | 0.10 |
(212) Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (raw) | 4 | 0.03 |
(242) Unknown and miscellaneous tests | 65 | -0.05 |
(229) Mega Test | 7 | -0.08 |
(239) Titan Test | 10 | -0.16 |
(218) Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.) | 11 | -0.22 |
(223) Strict Logic Sequences Exam II | 4 | -0.48 |
(243) Scholastic Aptitude Test (old) | 4 | -0.50 |
(235) Nonverbal Cognitive Performance Examination | 14 | -0.52 |
(237) Sigma Test | 10 | -0.56 |
(200) American College Testing program | 5 | -0.62 |
(241) Ultra Test | 4 | -0.98 |
Weighted average of correlations: -0.023 (N = 235, weighted sum = -5.43)
Please be aware that correlations with these external tests are in most cases affected (depressed, typically) by one or more of the following: (1) Little overlap with the object test because of the much lower ceilings and inherent ceiling effects of the tests used in regular psychology; (2) Candidates reporting scores selectively, for instance only the higher ones while withholding lower ones; (3) Candidates reporting, or having been reported by psychometricians, incorrect scores.
These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.
Type | n | g loading of Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms on that type |
---|---|---|
Verbal | 275 | -0.13 |
Numerical | 43 | -0.44 |
Spatial | 106 | -0.41 |
Logical | 38 | -0.60 |
Heterogeneous | 272 | -0.21 |
N = 734
Balanced g loading = -0.36
Country | n | median score |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 36.5 |
India | 2 | 32.0 |
United_States | 51 | 29.0 |
Australia | 4 | 28.0 |
Netherlands | 12 | 26.5 |
Canada | 8 | 25.5 |
Italy | 2 | 23.5 |
United_Kingdom | 8 | 22.0 |
Israel | 2 | 21.0 |
Finland | 6 | 19.5 |
Greece | 2 | 19.5 |
Norway | 3 | 18.0 |
Sweden | 7 | 15.0 |
France | 3 | 14.0 |
Poland | 2 | 12.0 |
Belgium | 3 | 11.0 |
Germany | 2 | 7.0 |
Correlation of this test with national average I.Q.'s published by Lynn and Vanhanen:
Personalia | n | r |
---|---|---|
P.S.I.A. Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 26 | 0.70 |
P.S.I.A. Introverted - Revision 2007 | 26 | 0.68 |
P.S.I.A. Cold - Revision 2007 | 26 | 0.64 |
P.S.I.A. System factor - Revision 2007 | 26 | 0.60 |
P.S.I.A. Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 26 | 0.57 |
P.S.I.A. Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 26 | 0.57 |
P.S.I.A. Extreme - Revision 2007 | 26 | 0.44 |
Disorders (own) | 111 | 0.41 |
P.S.I.A. Just - Revision 2007 | 26 | 0.39 |
P.S.I.A. Rare - Revision 2007 | 26 | 0.29 |
P.S.I.A. True - Revision 2007 | 26 | 0.27 |
P.S.I.A. Orderly - Revision 2007 | 26 | 0.26 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 92 | 0.24 |
Year of birth | 169 | 0.18 |
P.S.I.A. Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 26 | 0.16 |
P.S.I.A. Cruel - Revision 2007 | 26 | 0.12 |
Observed associative horizon | 13 | 0.10 |
P.S.I.A. Rational - Revision 2007 | 26 | 0.06 |
Mother's educational level | 76 | -0.00 |
Father's educational level | 73 | -0.07 |
Sex | 193 | -0.14 |
Observed behaviour | 34 | -0.18 |
Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes | 30 | -0.20 |
P.S.I.A. Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 26 | -0.21 |
Educational level | 97 | -0.32 |
Personalia | n | r |
---|---|---|
Observed associative horizon | 4 | 0.94 |
Mother's educational level | 5 | 0.94 |
Disorders (own) | 12 | 0.74 |
Year of birth | 29 | 0.32 |
Father's educational level | 5 | 0.14 |
Educational level | 10 | -0.22 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 8 | -0.46 |
Personalia | n | r |
---|---|---|
P.S.I.A. Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 24 | 0.70 |
P.S.I.A. Introverted - Revision 2007 | 24 | 0.68 |
P.S.I.A. Cold - Revision 2007 | 24 | 0.65 |
P.S.I.A. System factor - Revision 2007 | 24 | 0.63 |
P.S.I.A. Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 24 | 0.57 |
P.S.I.A. Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 24 | 0.57 |
P.S.I.A. Just - Revision 2007 | 24 | 0.51 |
P.S.I.A. Extreme - Revision 2007 | 24 | 0.45 |
Disorders (own) | 96 | 0.38 |
P.S.I.A. Rare - Revision 2007 | 24 | 0.28 |
P.S.I.A. True - Revision 2007 | 24 | 0.26 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 84 | 0.25 |
P.S.I.A. Orderly - Revision 2007 | 24 | 0.25 |
Year of birth | 138 | 0.22 |
P.S.I.A. Cruel - Revision 2007 | 24 | 0.15 |
P.S.I.A. Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 24 | 0.13 |
P.S.I.A. Rational - Revision 2007 | 24 | 0.09 |
Observed associative horizon | 9 | -0.06 |
Mother's educational level | 71 | -0.07 |
Father's educational level | 68 | -0.13 |
P.S.I.A. Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 24 | -0.19 |
Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes | 29 | -0.22 |
Observed behaviour | 28 | -0.29 |
Educational level | 87 | -0.36 |
In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based.
Raw score | Upward g (N) | Downward g (N) |
---|---|---|
0 | -0.29 (924) | NaN (0) |
9 | -0.37 (679) | 0.38 (144) |
17 | -0.33 (545) | 0.42 (283) |
25 | -0.23 (337) | 0.27 (510) |
33 | -0.60 (161) | -0.08 (718) |
54 | NaN (0) | -0.29 (924) |
Note: It can be deduced from this table that the g-loading of GAIA scores is lowly negative on the whole, but is actually positive in the lower half of the population who took this test.
The below statistics are based on a smaller sample (n = 60) from the year 2009, for which the internal data (item scores) were recorded.
Notice: This reliability is high for a non-intelligence personality test, and reflects the fact that the individual items almost all have clear positive correlations with total score. The combination of high reliability and negative g-loading is remarkable, and reveals the reality of the negative impact that deviance and disorders have on intelligence. This is important in understanding the rareness of genius, as discussed in Rareness and discontinuity of genius.
Age class | n | median score |
---|---|---|
70 to 74 | 1 | 20.0 |
65 to 69 | 1 | 7.0 |
60 to 64 | 1 | 21.0 |
55 to 59 | 4 | 25.0 |
50 to 54 | 8 | 15.0 |
45 to 49 | 10 | 22.0 |
40 to 44 | 4 | 31.0 |
35 to 39 | 6 | 27.0 |
30 to 34 | 11 | 29.0 |
25 to 29 | 7 | 26.0 |
22 to 24 | 4 | 24.0 |
20 or 21 | 1 | 33.0 |
N = 58
Age class | n | median score |
---|---|---|
70 to 74 | 1 | 20.0 |
60 to 64 | 1 | 21.0 |
55 to 59 | 1 | 22.0 |
45 to 49 | 4 | 22.0 |
40 to 44 | 2 | 31.0 |
35 to 39 | 1 | 30.0 |
30 to 34 | 3 | 29.0 |
25 to 29 | 2 | 28.5 |
22 to 24 | 2 | 25.0 |
N = 17
Age class | n | median score |
---|---|---|
65 to 69 | 1 | 7.0 |
55 to 59 | 3 | 26.0 |
50 to 54 | 8 | 15.0 |
45 to 49 | 6 | 24.0 |
40 to 44 | 2 | 22.5 |
35 to 39 | 5 | 27.0 |
30 to 34 | 8 | 29.0 |
25 to 29 | 5 | 24.0 |
22 to 24 | 2 | 24.0 |
20 or 21 | 1 | 33.0 |
N = 41
Item # | Hardness (q) | r |
---|---|---|
1 | 0.48 | 0.27 |
2 | 0.47 | 0.22 |
3 | 0.47 | 0.53 |
4 | 0.55 | 0.36 |
5 | 0.52 | 0.45 |
6 | 0.57 | 0.41 |
7 | 0.48 | 0.45 |
8 | 0.18 | 0.40 |
9 | 0.35 | 0.53 |
10 | 0.37 | 0.35 |
11 | 0.58 | 0.32 |
12 | 0.70 | 0.32 |
13 | 0.22 | 0.63 |
14 | 0.38 | 0.27 |
15 | 0.70 | -0.03 |
16 | 0.82 | 0.36 |
17 | 0.90 | 0.19 |
18 | 0.77 | 0.34 |
19 | 0.55 | 0.28 |
20 | 0.55 | 0.57 |
21 | 0.43 | 0.29 |
22 | 0.47 | 0.47 |
23 | 0.32 | 0.58 |
24 | 0.55 | 0.24 |
25 | 0.37 | 0.43 |
26 | 0.63 | 0.30 |
27 | 0.38 | 0.12 |
28 | 0.80 | 0.18 |
29 | 0.32 | 0.64 |
30 | 0.57 | 0.39 |
31 | 0.97 | 0.26 |
32 | 0.82 | 0.21 |
33 | 0.72 | 0.38 |
34 | 0.20 | 0.28 |
35 | 0.83 | 0.35 |
36 | 0.65 | 0.32 |
37 | 0.28 | 0.57 |
38 | 0.55 | 0.45 |
39 | 0.72 | 0.27 |
40 | 0.83 | 0.22 |
41 | 0.78 | 0.23 |
42 | 0.67 | 0.49 |
43 | 0.68 | 0.44 |
44 | 0.25 | 0.48 |
45 | 0.63 | 0.50 |
46 | 0.93 | 0.25 |
47 | 0.32 | 0.49 |
48 | 0.47 | 0.48 |
49 | 0.88 | 0.19 |
50 | 0.93 | 0.21 |
51 | 0.92 | 0.23 |
52 | 0.43 | 0.51 |
53 | 0.45 | 0.22 |
54 | 0.37 | 0.31 |