The educational levels reported by test candidates are encoded as follows:
Contents type: Personal information, observation, or non-cognitive personality test score in numeric form.
Score | Frequency |
---|---|
0 | 6 |
1 | 22 |
2 | 70 |
3 | 98 |
4 | 320 |
5 | 280 |
6 | 178 |
7 | 113 |
n = 949
Score | Frequency |
---|---|
0 | 5 |
1 | 18 |
2 | 64 |
3 | 83 |
4 | 273 |
5 | 251 |
6 | 158 |
7 | 97 |
n = 136
0 | * |
1 | **** |
2 | ****** |
3 | *************** |
4 | ********************************************** |
5 | **************************** |
6 | ******************** |
7 | **************** |
Test name | n | r | p value |
---|---|---|---|
Tests by Randy Myers (other than Advanced Intelligence Test) | 4 | 0.70 | 0.24 |
Stanford-Binet | 5 | 0.68 | 0.17 |
California Test of Mental Maturity | 4 | 0.66 | 0.26 |
Analogies #1 | 7 | 0.58 | 0.16 |
Tests by Brendan Harris (aggregate) | 5 | 0.54 | 0.27 |
Kvociento (Bram van Kaathoven) | 5 | 0.53 | 0.28 |
W-87 (International Society for Philosophical Enquiry) | 8 | 0.52 | 0.17 |
Graduate Management Admission Test | 4 | 0.51 | 0.37 |
Three Sonnets (Heinrich Siemens) | 4 | 0.44 | 0.44 |
Gliaweb Recycled Intelligence Test | 6 | 0.43 | 0.34 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #1 | 15 | 0.42 | 0.12 |
A Relaxing Test (David Miller) | 14 | 0.42 | 0.13 |
Tests by Marc-André Nydegger (aggregate) | 6 | 0.41 | 0.36 |
Dicing with death | 19 | 0.38 | 0.10 |
Cooijmans On-Line Test | 15 | 0.37 | 0.17 |
G-test (Nikos Lygeros) | 9 | 0.36 | 0.30 |
Analogies subtest of Long Test For Genius (Netherlandic) | 6 | 0.35 | 0.44 |
Reason | 37 | 0.31 | 0.06 |
Short Test For Genius | 11 | 0.29 | 0.37 |
Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato) | 50 | 0.28 | 0.05 |
American College Testing program (from October 1989 onward) | 9 | 0.28 | 0.42 |
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice | 30 | 0.28 | 0.13 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Paul Cooijmans) | 70 | 0.26 | 0.03 |
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (raw) | 26 | 0.25 | 0.22 |
Cattell Verbal (also known as Cattell B) | 8 | 0.24 | 0.52 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 62 | 0.24 | 0.06 |
The Bonsai Test - Revision 2016 | 70 | 0.23 | 0.06 |
Tests by Greg Grove (aggregate) | 37 | 0.22 | 0.18 |
Divine Psychometry (Matthew Scillitani) | 14 | 0.22 | 0.44 |
Qoymans Automatic Test #3 | 8 | 0.21 | 0.57 |
Sigma Test (Melão Hindemburg) | 22 | 0.20 | 0.36 |
Labyrinthine LIMIT | 32 | 0.20 | 0.27 |
Epiq Tests (aggregate) | 52 | 0.19 | 0.16 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 1 | 16 | 0.19 | 0.46 |
The Final Test - Revision 2013 | 19 | 0.19 | 0.42 |
Tests by Nicolas Elenas (aggregate) | 15 | 0.18 | 0.50 |
Qoymans Automatic Test #1 | 11 | 0.18 | 0.57 |
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.) | 38 | 0.17 | 0.28 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #2 | 15 | 0.17 | 0.52 |
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the first degree | 24 | 0.17 | 0.42 |
Tests by James Dorsey (aggregate) | 9 | 0.17 | 0.64 |
Test of Inductive Reasoning / J.C.T.I. (Xavier Jouve) | 28 | 0.16 | 0.40 |
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales for Children | 11 | 0.16 | 0.62 |
Tests by Mislav Predavec (aggregate) | 16 | 0.16 | 0.54 |
Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 33 | 0.15 | 0.38 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3 | 199 | 0.14 | 0.04 |
Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 76 | 0.14 | 0.24 |
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 106 | 0.13 | 0.18 |
Tests by Jason Betts (aggregate) | 26 | 0.12 | 0.54 |
The Gate | 6 | 0.12 | 0.78 |
Reason - Revision 2008 | 112 | 0.11 | 0.24 |
Spatial Insight Test | 23 | 0.11 | 0.62 |
Cattell Culture Fair | 34 | 0.10 | 0.54 |
Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 58 | 0.09 | 0.48 |
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 57 | 0.09 | 0.52 |
Genius Association Test | 111 | 0.08 | 0.38 |
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 80 | 0.08 | 0.48 |
Logima Strictica 24 (Robert Lato) | 16 | 0.08 | 0.76 |
Associative LIMIT | 78 | 0.08 | 0.48 |
Space, Time, and Hyperspace - Revision 2016 | 82 | 0.08 | 0.48 |
Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 127 | 0.08 | 0.38 |
Long Test For Genius (Netherlandic) | 5 | 0.08 | 0.87 |
Cartoons of Shock | 45 | 0.07 | 0.64 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 143 | 0.07 | 0.40 |
International High IQ Society tests (aggregate) | 52 | 0.07 | 0.62 |
Space, Time, and Hyperspace | 55 | 0.07 | 0.62 |
Tests by Nikolaos Soulios (aggregate) | 25 | 0.07 | 0.74 |
The Nemesis Test | 66 | 0.06 | 0.60 |
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011 | 200 | 0.06 | 0.37 |
Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 121 | 0.06 | 0.52 |
Psychometric Qrosswords | 26 | 0.06 | 0.76 |
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 52 | 0.05 | 0.71 |
Numbers | 53 | 0.05 | 0.74 |
Tests by Theodosis Prousalis (aggregate) | 14 | 0.05 | 0.87 |
Test of Shock and Awe | 16 | 0.05 | 0.87 |
Miscellaneous tests | 212 | 0.03 | 0.62 |
Scholastic Aptitude Test (old) | 16 | 0.03 | 0.90 |
Reflections In Peroxide | 57 | 0.03 | 0.81 |
The Sargasso Test | 74 | 0.03 | 0.81 |
The Alchemist Test (Anas El Husseini) | 39 | 0.03 | 0.87 |
Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 112 | 0.03 | 0.78 |
Chimera High Ability Riddle Test (Bill Bultas) | 5 | 0.03 | 0.94 |
The Final Test | 61 | 0.02 | 0.84 |
Daedalus Test | 42 | 0.02 | 0.90 |
Test of the Beheaded Man | 60 | 0.01 | 0.92 |
Tests by Xavier Jouve, other than those listed separately (aggregate) | 18 | 0.01 | 0.97 |
Verbal section of The Marathon Test | 44 | 0.01 | 0.97 |
Association and Analogies (German) | 5 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
Cattell Culture Fair Intelligence Test 20-R | 4 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude | 47 | -0.00 | 1.00 |
Psychometrically Activated Grids Acerbate Neuroticism | 18 | -0.00 | 0.97 |
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008 | 111 | -0.01 | 0.94 |
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales | 44 | -0.01 | 0.94 |
De Laatste Test - Herziening 2019 | 7 | -0.01 | 0.97 |
European I.Q. Test | 8 | -0.01 | 0.97 |
Laaglandse Aanlegtest - Herziening 2016 | 9 | -0.01 | 0.97 |
The Piper's Test | 23 | -0.02 | 0.94 |
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the third degree | 63 | -0.02 | 0.90 |
The Smell Test | 10 | -0.02 | 0.94 |
Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve) | 39 | -0.03 | 0.87 |
Isis Test | 83 | -0.03 | 0.76 |
Ultra Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 11 | -0.04 | 0.90 |
Mega Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 10 | -0.05 | 0.90 |
Cito-toets | 12 | -0.05 | 0.87 |
Only idiots | 14 | -0.06 | 0.84 |
Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström) | 55 | -0.06 | 0.66 |
Titan Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 20 | -0.06 | 0.78 |
Strict Logic Sequences Exam I (Jonathan Wai) | 76 | -0.06 | 0.62 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4 | 113 | -0.06 | 0.50 |
Narcissus' last stand | 34 | -0.07 | 0.68 |
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version) | 38 | -0.07 | 0.66 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test 5 | 74 | -0.07 | 0.52 |
Numerical section of The Marathon Test | 68 | -0.07 | 0.54 |
Advanced Intelligence Test (Randy Myers) | 13 | -0.08 | 0.78 |
Analogies of Long Test For Genius | 33 | -0.08 | 0.64 |
Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test | 66 | -0.09 | 0.46 |
Odds | 21 | -0.10 | 0.66 |
Association subtest of Long Test For Genius | 38 | -0.10 | 0.54 |
Random Feickery (Brandon Feick) | 9 | -0.11 | 0.76 |
Numerical Insight Test | 13 | -0.12 | 0.66 |
Tests by Ivan Ivec (aggregate) | 33 | -0.12 | 0.48 |
The Test To End All Tests | 60 | -0.13 | 0.34 |
The Hammer Of Test-Hungry - Revision 2013 | 18 | -0.13 | 0.60 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5 | 114 | -0.13 | 0.16 |
Tests by Paul Laurent Miranda (aggregate) | 17 | -0.14 | 0.57 |
916 Test (Laurent Dubois) | 22 | -0.14 | 0.52 |
Tickle Tests (tickle.com) | 5 | -0.14 | 0.78 |
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the fourth degree | 4 | -0.15 | 0.78 |
Graduate Record Examination (prior to October 2001) | 11 | -0.15 | 0.64 |
Qoymans Automatic Test #2 | 10 | -0.16 | 0.62 |
Bonsai Test | 17 | -0.17 | 0.50 |
Spatial section of The Marathon Test | 67 | -0.17 | 0.17 |
The Marathon Test | 40 | -0.18 | 0.27 |
Queendom tests | 11 | -0.19 | 0.54 |
Strict Logic Spatial Exam 48 (Jonathan Wai) | 32 | -0.19 | 0.28 |
Long Test For Genius | 28 | -0.20 | 0.30 |
Cooijmans On-Line Test - Two-barrelled version | 34 | -0.22 | 0.20 |
Hoeflin Power Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 8 | -0.22 | 0.54 |
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree | 55 | -0.23 | 0.08 |
Low Countries Aptitude Test | 7 | -0.24 | 0.54 |
Words | 20 | -0.25 | 0.28 |
Scholastic Aptitude Test (new) | 12 | -0.27 | 0.37 |
The LAW - Letters And Words | 17 | -0.32 | 0.20 |
Gliaweb Raadselachtig Analogieproefwerk | 9 | -0.32 | 0.37 |
Letters | 19 | -0.34 | 0.15 |
The Blue Test (Andres Gomez Emilsson) | 11 | -0.37 | 0.25 |
Sequentia Numerica Form I (Alexander Herkner) | 13 | -0.37 | 0.19 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Jonathan Wai) | 11 | -0.44 | 0.16 |
Strict Logic Sequences Exam II (Jonathan Wai) | 21 | -0.45 | 0.04 |
American College Testing program (prior to October 1989) | 5 | -0.46 | 0.36 |
Tests by Iakovos Koukas (aggregate) | 10 | -0.54 | 0.11 |
Association subtest of Long Test For Genius (Netherlandic) | 6 | -0.57 | 0.20 |
Tests by Arne Andre Gangvik (aggregate) | 4 | -0.58 | 0.32 |
Drenth number series | 5 | -0.60 | 0.24 |
Concep-T (Laurent Dubois) | 9 | -0.62 | 0.08 |
Omega Contemplative Items Pool (Tommy Smith) | 7 | -0.62 | 0.12 |
Magma Test (Edward Vanhove) | 4 | -0.67 | 0.25 |
Encephalist - R (Xavier Jouve) | 6 | -0.67 | 0.13 |
Evens | 9 | -0.71 | 0.04 |
Miller Analogies Test (before 2001; raw) | 7 | -0.74 | 0.07 |
F.N.A. (Xavier Jouve) | 4 | -0.76 | 0.18 |
Female Intelligence Test | 5 | -0.77 | 0.12 |
New York High I.Q. Society tests | 4 | -0.79 | 0.17 |
Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices (I.Q.) | 4 | -0.83 | 0.15 |
De Roskam | 5 | -0.84 | 0.09 |
De Golfstroomtest - Herziening 2019 | 6 | -0.86 | 0.05 |
Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery - Armed Forces Qualification Test | 4 | -0.87 | 0.13 |
The Hammer Of Test-Hungry | 4 | -0.96 | 0.10 |
Weighted mean of correlations: 0.027 (N = 5736)
Estimated g factor loading: 0.16
Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.
Notice: The g loading of father's educational level is extremely small on the whole.
Test name | n | r | p value |
---|---|---|---|
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 4 | 0.84 | 0.14 |
Cartoons of Shock | 5 | 0.81 | 0.11 |
Test of the Beheaded Man | 4 | 0.80 | 0.16 |
The Final Test | 4 | 0.72 | 0.22 |
Cattell Culture Fair | 4 | 0.66 | 0.26 |
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 4 | 0.62 | 0.28 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4 | 7 | 0.55 | 0.18 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Paul Cooijmans) | 8 | 0.42 | 0.27 |
Miscellaneous tests | 23 | 0.42 | 0.05 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3 | 14 | 0.28 | 0.30 |
Genius Association Test | 6 | 0.16 | 0.71 |
Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 4 | 0.13 | 0.81 |
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011 | 17 | 0.08 | 0.74 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 15 | 0.03 | 0.90 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5 | 5 | 0.02 | 0.97 |
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008 | 5 | 0.01 | 1.00 |
Reason - Revision 2008 | 5 | -0.01 | 1.00 |
Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström) | 4 | -0.33 | 0.57 |
Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 4 | -0.39 | 0.50 |
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version) | 4 | -0.69 | 0.24 |
Associative LIMIT | 4 | -0.76 | 0.18 |
Weighted mean of correlations: 0.227 (N = 150)
Estimated g factor loading among females: 0.48
Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.
Notice: Within females, the g loading of father's educational level is markedly greater than overall, and this may just be significant.
These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.
Type | n | g loading of Father's educational level on that type |
---|---|---|
Verbal | 1029 | 0.11 |
Numerical | 372 | -0.17 |
Spatial | 575 | 0.18 |
Logical | 234 | 0.39 |
Heterogeneous | 1869 | 0.18 |
N = 4079
Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.
Balanced g loading = 0.14
Country | n | mean score |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 3 | 5.7 |
Argentina | 7 | 5.6 |
India | 26 | 5.5 |
Bulgaria | 8 | 5.5 |
Thailand | 3 | 5.3 |
Serbia | 4 | 5.3 |
Russia | 5 | 5.2 |
Yugoslavia | 5 | 5.2 |
Switzerland | 8 | 5.1 |
Chile | 3 | 5.0 |
Iran | 5 | 5.0 |
Nigeria | 5 | 5.0 |
Romania | 8 | 5.0 |
South_Africa | 9 | 5.0 |
United_States | 302 | 4.9 |
Israel | 7 | 4.9 |
New_Zealand | 6 | 4.8 |
Poland | 15 | 4.8 |
Brazil | 12 | 4.8 |
Austria | 15 | 4.7 |
Japan | 11 | 4.7 |
Korea_South | 18 | 4.7 |
Philippines | 6 | 4.7 |
Slovenia | 3 | 4.7 |
Turkey | 15 | 4.7 |
United_Kingdom | 48 | 4.7 |
Germany | 77 | 4.6 |
Norway | 14 | 4.6 |
France | 19 | 4.5 |
Canada | 31 | 4.5 |
Cuba | 3 | 4.3 |
Greece | 27 | 4.3 |
Belgium | 22 | 4.3 |
China | 22 | 4.3 |
Sweden | 60 | 4.3 |
Australia | 19 | 4.3 |
Mexico | 8 | 4.3 |
Italy | 22 | 4.2 |
Netherlands | 83 | 4.2 |
Finland | 30 | 4.2 |
Denmark | 13 | 4.1 |
Singapore | 5 | 4.0 |
Portugal | 5 | 3.8 |
Bosnia_and_Herzegovina | 3 | 3.7 |
Czech_Republic | 4 | 3.5 |
Hong_Kong | 6 | 3.3 |
Spain | 25 | 3.1 |
Cyprus | 3 | 2.3 |
Total number of countries: 71
For reasons of privacy, only countries with 3 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the unrounded means, and then alphabetic.
Personalia | n | r | p value |
---|---|---|---|
Mother's educational level | 1080 | 0.59 | ≈ 0 |
Year of birth | 1087 | 0.13 | 0.000009 |
PSIA Cruel - Revision 2007 | 94 | 0.12 | 0.25 |
PSIA Just - Revision 2007 | 94 | 0.08 | 0.42 |
Educational level | 1087 | 0.07 | 0.02 |
Disorders (own) | 1085 | 0.06 | 0.04 |
PSIA Rational - Revision 2007 | 94 | 0.05 | 0.62 |
PSIA Rare - Revision 2007 | 94 | 0.05 | 0.64 |
Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes | 55 | 0.03 | 0.84 |
Sex | 1087 | 0.02 | 0.62 |
PSIA Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 94 | -0.01 | 0.94 |
PSIA System factor - Revision 2007 | 94 | -0.01 | 0.94 |
PSIA Cold - Revision 2007 | 94 | -0.02 | 0.81 |
PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 94 | -0.03 | 0.76 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 1083 | -0.04 | 0.25 |
Observed behaviour | 91 | -0.05 | 0.64 |
PSIA Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 94 | -0.05 | 0.62 |
PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 94 | -0.08 | 0.46 |
PSIA Extreme - Revision 2007 | 94 | -0.08 | 0.44 |
PSIA Orderly - Revision 2007 | 94 | -0.09 | 0.40 |
PSIA Introverted - Revision 2007 | 94 | -0.09 | 0.38 |
PSIA True - Revision 2007 | 94 | -0.13 | 0.19 |
PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 94 | -0.15 | 0.15 |
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 85 | -0.16 | 0.14 |
Observed associative horizon | 37 | -0.26 | 0.12 |
Observation: There is an exceedingly significant moderate positive correlation of Father's educational level with Mother's educational level, reflecting assortative mating, one presumes. Virtually the same correlation is seen below for both the female and the male candidates separately, which makes sense given that the assortative mating took place before the candidate (child) was conceived, and can therefore not have been affected by the sex of the candidate. The fact that this correlation is so alike within-sex confirms that it is genuine, and also confirms that the statistic was reported correctly on the whole.
Personalia | n | r | p value |
---|---|---|---|
Mother's educational level | 135 | 0.62 | 0.0000000000008 |
PSIA Cold - Revision 2007 | 10 | 0.42 | 0.22 |
PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 10 | 0.39 | 0.25 |
PSIA System factor - Revision 2007 | 10 | 0.38 | 0.26 |
PSIA Rare - Revision 2007 | 10 | 0.31 | 0.36 |
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 7 | 0.29 | 0.48 |
PSIA Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 10 | 0.26 | 0.44 |
PSIA Orderly - Revision 2007 | 10 | 0.23 | 0.50 |
Educational level | 136 | 0.19 | 0.03 |
Year of birth | 136 | 0.16 | 0.06 |
PSIA Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 10 | 0.16 | 0.64 |
Disorders (own) | 136 | 0.15 | 0.09 |
PSIA Just - Revision 2007 | 10 | 0.08 | 0.81 |
PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 10 | 0.08 | 0.81 |
Observed associative horizon | 5 | 0.08 | 0.87 |
PSIA Introverted - Revision 2007 | 10 | 0.05 | 0.90 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 136 | 0.01 | 0.90 |
PSIA Rational - Revision 2007 | 10 | -0.02 | 0.94 |
PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 10 | -0.12 | 0.74 |
PSIA Extreme - Revision 2007 | 10 | -0.12 | 0.71 |
PSIA True - Revision 2007 | 10 | -0.21 | 0.52 |
Observed behaviour | 8 | -0.47 | 0.22 |
PSIA Cruel - Revision 2007 | 10 | -0.67 | 0.05 |
Personalia | n | r | p value |
---|---|---|---|
Mother's educational level | 943 | 0.59 | ≈ 0 |
Year of birth | 949 | 0.13 | 0.00005 |
PSIA Cruel - Revision 2007 | 84 | 0.12 | 0.28 |
Educational level | 949 | 0.06 | 0.08 |
Disorders (own) | 947 | 0.05 | 0.12 |
PSIA Just - Revision 2007 | 84 | 0.04 | 0.71 |
PSIA Rational - Revision 2007 | 84 | 0.03 | 0.78 |
Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes | 55 | 0.03 | 0.84 |
PSIA Rare - Revision 2007 | 84 | -0.01 | 0.94 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 945 | -0.04 | 0.19 |
PSIA Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 84 | -0.05 | 0.62 |
PSIA Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 84 | -0.06 | 0.57 |
PSIA Extreme - Revision 2007 | 84 | -0.07 | 0.52 |
PSIA System factor - Revision 2007 | 84 | -0.08 | 0.46 |
PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 84 | -0.09 | 0.42 |
PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 84 | -0.09 | 0.40 |
Observed behaviour | 83 | -0.10 | 0.37 |
PSIA Cold - Revision 2007 | 84 | -0.10 | 0.36 |
PSIA Introverted - Revision 2007 | 84 | -0.11 | 0.34 |
PSIA Orderly - Revision 2007 | 84 | -0.11 | 0.32 |
PSIA True - Revision 2007 | 84 | -0.11 | 0.32 |
PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 84 | -0.13 | 0.24 |
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 78 | -0.21 | 0.06 |
Observed associative horizon | 32 | -0.29 | 0.10 |
In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for these values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.
Below 1st quartile (raw 4.0) | 0.24 (n = 2861) |
---|---|
Below median (raw 5.0) | -0.13 (n = 4332) |
Above median (raw 5.0) | 0.34 (n = 2773) |
Above 3rd quartile (raw 6.0) | 0.34 (n = 1291) |
The g of father's educational level varies across the spectrum of educational levels, and is actually highest downward of 2 (primary school completed), although this is not shown in the above table.