The educational levels reported by test candidates are encoded as follows:
0 | ****** |
1 | ********************** |
2 | *************************************************************** |
3 | ************************************************************************************** |
4 | *************************************************************************************** ********************************************************************************************* ******************************************************************************************** ********* |
5 | ******************************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************************** *************************************************************** |
6 | ******************************************************************************************* ********************************************************************* |
7 | ******************************************************************** **************************** |
n = 832
0 | ***** |
1 | ****************** |
2 | ********************************************************** |
3 | ************************************************************************ |
4 | ******************************************************************************** ********************************************************************************* ****************************************************************************** |
5 | ********************************************************************************** ********************************************************************************* ******************************************************* |
6 | ******************************************** ************************************************************************ ************************* |
7 | ********************************************************* ************************ |
n = 128
0 | * |
1 | **** |
2 | ***** |
3 | ************** |
4 | ****************************************** |
5 | **************************** |
6 | ******************* |
7 | *************** |
(Test index) Test name | n | r |
---|---|---|
(113) The Piper's Test | 6 | 0.59 |
(77) Analogies #1 | 7 | 0.58 |
(51) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #1 | 14 | 0.46 |
(109) The Bonsai Test - Revision 2016 | 34 | 0.40 |
(74) Cooijmans On-Line Test | 15 | 0.37 |
(76) Analogies subtest of Long Test For Genius (Netherlandic) | 6 | 0.35 |
(56) Short Test For Genius | 11 | 0.31 |
(82) Reason | 37 | 0.31 |
(62) Reason Behind Multiple-Choice | 30 | 0.28 |
(107) The Alchemist Test | 17 | 0.27 |
(13) Laaglandse Aanlegtest - Herziening 2016 | 4 | 0.25 |
(87) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 62 | 0.24 |
(73) Qoymans Automatic Test #3 | 8 | 0.21 |
(85) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 1 | 16 | 0.19 |
(4) A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude | 27 | 0.19 |
(104) The Final Test - Revision 2013 | 19 | 0.19 |
(72) Qoymans Automatic Test #1 | 11 | 0.18 |
(52) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #2 | 15 | 0.17 |
(10) Genius Association Test | 97 | 0.17 |
(53) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 | 81 | 0.16 |
(43) Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 33 | 0.15 |
(21) Psychometric Qrosswords | 18 | 0.14 |
(66) Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 76 | 0.14 |
(26) Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 106 | 0.13 |
(33) Problems In Gentle Slopes of the first degree | 20 | 0.13 |
(112) Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 36 | 0.13 |
(44) Associative LIMIT | 62 | 0.12 |
(39) Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 50 | 0.12 |
(24) Reason - Revision 2008 | 83 | 0.11 |
(105) Space, Time, and Hyperspace - Revision 2016 | 38 | 0.11 |
(2) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3 | 148 | 0.09 |
(22) Gliaweb Raadselachtig Analogieënproefwerk | 4 | 0.09 |
(19) Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 83 | 0.09 |
(55) Spatial Insight Test | 23 | 0.09 |
(111) Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 29 | 0.09 |
(114) Dicing with death | 8 | 0.08 |
(27) Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 119 | 0.08 |
(65) Long Test For Genius (Netherlandic) | 5 | 0.08 |
(83) KIT Intelligence Test - first attempts | 14 | 0.07 |
(80) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 143 | 0.07 |
(1) Cartoons of Shock | 45 | 0.07 |
(57) Space, Time, and Hyperspace | 55 | 0.07 |
(108) Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 28 | 0.06 |
(54) Test of Shock and Awe | 16 | 0.05 |
(68) Numbers | 53 | 0.03 |
(106) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4 | 71 | 0.03 |
(36) Reflections In Peroxide | 23 | 0.03 |
(25) The Sargasso Test | 47 | 0.03 |
(40) Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008 | 81 | 0.02 |
(23) Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011 | 168 | 0.02 |
(7) The Final Test | 60 | 0.02 |
(37) Problems In Gentle Slopes of the third degree | 31 | 0.01 |
(0) Test of the Beheaded Man | 40 | 0.01 |
(59) Association and Analogies (German) | 5 | 0.00 |
(45) Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test | 44 | -0.01 |
(11) Isis Test | 61 | -0.01 |
(30) Verbal section of The Marathon Test | 34 | -0.01 |
(46) Labyrinthine LIMIT | 15 | -0.02 |
(16) Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 92 | -0.05 |
(32) Spatial section of The Marathon Test | 45 | -0.06 |
(116) Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version) | 38 | -0.07 |
(48) Narcissus' last stand | 20 | -0.07 |
(75) Analogies of Long Test For Genius | 33 | -0.08 |
(3) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5 | 84 | -0.09 |
(35) Intelligence Quantifier by assessment | 69 | -0.09 |
(18) The Nemesis Test | 43 | -0.09 |
(69) Odds | 21 | -0.10 |
(110) Cooijmans Intelligence Test 5 | 27 | -0.10 |
(79) Association subtest of Long Test For Genius | 38 | -0.10 |
(31) Numerical section of The Marathon Test | 46 | -0.11 |
(47) Psychometrically Activated Grids Acerbate Neuroticism | 12 | -0.12 |
(71) Numerical Insight Test | 13 | -0.12 |
(117) The Hammer Of Test-Hungry - Revision 2013 | 18 | -0.13 |
(28) The Test To End All Tests | 46 | -0.13 |
(103) Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree | 31 | -0.14 |
(42) The Marathon Test | 30 | -0.16 |
(50) Qoymans Automatic Test #2 | 10 | -0.16 |
(84) Bonsai Test | 17 | -0.17 |
(5) Daedalus Test | 28 | -0.19 |
(63) Long Test For Genius | 28 | -0.20 |
(14) Low Countries Aptitude Test | 7 | -0.24 |
(29) Words | 20 | -0.25 |
(12) Cooijmans On-Line Test - Two-barrelled version | 32 | -0.25 |
(41) The LAW - Letters And Words | 17 | -0.32 |
(15) Letters | 19 | -0.34 |
(81) Association subtest of Long Test For Genius (Netherlandic) | 6 | -0.57 |
(86) Evens | 9 | -0.71 |
(34) De Roskam | 4 | -0.76 |
(8) Female Intelligence Test | 5 | -0.77 |
(49) The Hammer Of Test-Hungry | 4 | -0.96 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.039 (N = 3404, weighted sum = 131.69)
Conservatively estimated minimum g loading: 0.20
(Test index) Test name | n | r |
---|---|---|
(208) California Test of Mental Maturity | 4 | 0.66 |
(206) W-87 | 8 | 0.52 |
(232) GMAT | 4 | 0.51 |
(221) National I.Q. Tests | 4 | 0.42 |
(217) G-test | 8 | 0.41 |
(225) Logima Strictica 36 | 48 | 0.35 |
(214) Epiq Tests | 14 | 0.28 |
(241) Ultra Test | 9 | 0.27 |
(212) Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (raw) | 23 | 0.27 |
(224) Test of Inductive Reasoning | 12 | 0.22 |
(226) Logima Strictica 24 | 15 | 0.22 |
(200) American College Testing program | 13 | 0.17 |
(219) Graduate Record Examination | 11 | 0.16 |
(201) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales | 36 | 0.14 |
(218) Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.) | 26 | 0.14 |
(236) International High IQ Society Miscellaneous tests | 50 | 0.08 |
(237) Sigma Test | 21 | 0.05 |
(235) Nonverbal Cognitive Performance Examination | 39 | 0.05 |
(239) Titan Test | 17 | 0.04 |
(243) Scholastic Aptitude Test (old) | 16 | 0.03 |
(204) Chimera High Ability Riddle Test | 5 | 0.03 |
(229) Mega Test | 9 | 0.02 |
(240) Strict Logic Spatial Exam 48 | 28 | 0.02 |
(242) Unknown and miscellaneous tests | 215 | -0.00 |
(220) Cattell Culture Fair | 33 | -0.02 |
(234) Strict Logic Sequences Exam I | 70 | -0.03 |
(231) Mysterium Entrance Exam | 30 | -0.05 |
(205) Cito-toets | 12 | -0.05 |
(211) Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version | 55 | -0.06 |
(202) Cattell Verbal | 7 | -0.06 |
(223) Strict Logic Sequences Exam II | 17 | -0.15 |
(238) 916 Test | 20 | -0.20 |
(233) Hoeflin Power Test | 6 | -0.23 |
(247) Advanced Intelligence Test | 11 | -0.27 |
(203) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales for Children | 8 | -0.30 |
(244) Scholastic Aptitude Test (new) | 10 | -0.33 |
(246) Sequentia Numerica Form I | 13 | -0.37 |
(227) Concep-T | 8 | -0.59 |
(209) Drenth number series | 5 | -0.60 |
(230) Omega Contemplative Items Pool | 7 | -0.62 |
(213) Encephalist - R | 6 | -0.67 |
(228) Miller Analogies Test (raw; old version) | 7 | -0.74 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.020 (N = 960, weighted sum = 19.41)
Please be aware that correlations with these external tests are in most cases affected (depressed, typically) by one or more of the following: (1) Little overlap with the object test because of the much lower ceilings and inherent ceiling effects of the tests used in regular psychology; (2) Candidates reporting scores selectively, for instance only the higher ones while withholding lower ones; (3) Candidates reporting, or having been reported by psychometricians, incorrect scores.
(Test index) Test name | n | r |
---|---|---|
(87) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 4 | 0.84 |
(1) Cartoons of Shock | 5 | 0.81 |
(7) The Final Test | 4 | 0.72 |
(26) Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 4 | 0.62 |
(106) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4 | 5 | 0.57 |
(35) Intelligence Quantifier by assessment | 7 | 0.49 |
(53) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 | 9 | 0.34 |
(2) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3 | 14 | 0.28 |
(23) Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011 | 15 | 0.22 |
(10) Genius Association Test | 6 | 0.16 |
(80) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 15 | 0.03 |
(3) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5 | 5 | 0.02 |
(40) Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008 | 5 | 0.01 |
(24) Reason - Revision 2008 | 5 | -0.01 |
(16) Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 4 | -0.39 |
(116) Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version) | 4 | -0.69 |
(44) Associative LIMIT | 4 | -0.76 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.204 (N = 115, weighted sum = 23.51)
Conservatively estimated minimum g loading among females: 0.45
These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.
Type | n | g loading of Father's educational level on that type |
---|---|---|
Verbal | 904 | 0.19 |
Numerical | 225 | -0.16 |
Spatial | 372 | 0.18 |
Logical | 163 | 0.36 |
Heterogeneous | 1084 | 0.21 |
N = 2748
Balanced g loading = 0.16
Country | n | mean score |
---|---|---|
Hungary | 2 | 6.50 |
Thailand | 2 | 6.00 |
Argentina | 6 | 5.83 |
Malaysia | 3 | 5.67 |
Russia | 3 | 5.67 |
India | 24 | 5.58 |
Bulgaria | 8 | 5.50 |
Iran | 4 | 5.50 |
Yugoslavia | 5 | 5.20 |
Romania | 6 | 5.17 |
Chile | 3 | 5.00 |
New_Zealand | 4 | 5.00 |
Nigeria | 4 | 5.00 |
Philippines | 5 | 5.00 |
South_Africa | 9 | 5.00 |
Switzerland | 5 | 5.00 |
Poland | 14 | 4.93 |
Israel | 7 | 4.86 |
United_States | 263 | 4.83 |
Austria | 12 | 4.75 |
Brazil | 12 | 4.75 |
Korea_South | 15 | 4.67 |
Slovenia | 3 | 4.67 |
Norway | 13 | 4.62 |
France | 18 | 4.61 |
Canada | 28 | 4.61 |
United_Kingdom | 42 | 4.60 |
Germany | 67 | 4.58 |
Belgium | 20 | 4.50 |
Croatia | 2 | 4.50 |
Serbia | 2 | 4.50 |
Turkey | 11 | 4.45 |
Australia | 17 | 4.35 |
Sweden | 58 | 4.34 |
Greece | 24 | 4.33 |
Singapore | 3 | 4.33 |
Italy | 19 | 4.32 |
China | 19 | 4.26 |
Mexico | 8 | 4.25 |
Finland | 27 | 4.15 |
Japan | 7 | 4.14 |
Netherlands | 78 | 4.13 |
Denmark | 13 | 4.08 |
Portugal | 4 | 3.75 |
Hong_Kong | 5 | 3.60 |
Bosnia_and_Herzegovina | 4 | 3.50 |
Cuba | 2 | 3.50 |
Slovakia | 2 | 3.50 |
Czech_Republic | 3 | 3.00 |
Spain | 23 | 3.00 |
Cyprus | 3 | 2.33 |
Correlation of this test with national average I.Q.'s published by Lynn and Vanhanen:
Personalia | n | r |
---|---|---|
Mother's educational level | 955 | 0.60 |
P.S.I.A. Cruel - Revision 2007 | 68 | 0.18 |
Year of birth | 961 | 0.13 |
Educational level | 961 | 0.09 |
P.S.I.A. Rare - Revision 2007 | 68 | 0.08 |
P.S.I.A. Just - Revision 2007 | 68 | 0.07 |
Disorders (own) | 958 | 0.06 |
Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes | 40 | 0.05 |
P.S.I.A. Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 68 | 0.03 |
P.S.I.A. Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 68 | 0.03 |
Sex | 961 | 0.01 |
P.S.I.A. Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 68 | -0.00 |
P.S.I.A. Rational - Revision 2007 | 68 | -0.01 |
P.S.I.A. System factor - Revision 2007 | 68 | -0.03 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 957 | -0.04 |
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 71 | -0.04 |
P.S.I.A. Cold - Revision 2007 | 68 | -0.05 |
Observed behaviour | 80 | -0.09 |
P.S.I.A. Orderly - Revision 2007 | 68 | -0.10 |
P.S.I.A. Introverted - Revision 2007 | 68 | -0.13 |
P.S.I.A. True - Revision 2007 | 68 | -0.15 |
P.S.I.A. Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 68 | -0.16 |
P.S.I.A. Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 68 | -0.19 |
P.S.I.A. Extreme - Revision 2007 | 68 | -0.20 |
Observed associative horizon | 34 | -0.27 |
Observation: There is a significant moderate positive correlation of Father's educational level with Mother's educational level, reflecting assortative mating, one presumes. Virtually the same correlation is seen below for both the female and the male candidates separately, which makes sense given that the assortative mating took place before the candidate (child) was conceived, and can therefore not have been affected by the sex of the candidate. The fact that this correlation is so alike within-sex confirms that it is genuine, and also confirms that the statistic was reported correctly on the whole.
Personalia | n | r |
---|---|---|
Mother's educational level | 127 | 0.61 |
P.S.I.A. Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 8 | 0.57 |
P.S.I.A. Rare - Revision 2007 | 8 | 0.55 |
P.S.I.A. Cold - Revision 2007 | 8 | 0.36 |
P.S.I.A. Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 8 | 0.33 |
P.S.I.A. Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 8 | 0.33 |
P.S.I.A. System factor - Revision 2007 | 8 | 0.32 |
P.S.I.A. Orderly - Revision 2007 | 8 | 0.26 |
Educational level | 128 | 0.23 |
Year of birth | 128 | 0.19 |
P.S.I.A. Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 8 | 0.17 |
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 5 | 0.14 |
Disorders (own) | 128 | 0.12 |
Observed associative horizon | 5 | 0.08 |
P.S.I.A. Rational - Revision 2007 | 8 | 0.06 |
P.S.I.A. Introverted - Revision 2007 | 8 | 0.04 |
P.S.I.A. Just - Revision 2007 | 8 | -0.02 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 128 | -0.02 |
P.S.I.A. Extreme - Revision 2007 | 8 | -0.07 |
P.S.I.A. Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 8 | -0.18 |
P.S.I.A. True - Revision 2007 | 8 | -0.27 |
Observed behaviour | 7 | -0.61 |
P.S.I.A. Cruel - Revision 2007 | 8 | -0.65 |
Personalia | n | r |
---|---|---|
Mother's educational level | 827 | 0.60 |
P.S.I.A. Cruel - Revision 2007 | 60 | 0.19 |
Year of birth | 832 | 0.12 |
Educational level | 832 | 0.06 |
Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes | 40 | 0.05 |
Disorders (own) | 829 | 0.05 |
P.S.I.A. Just - Revision 2007 | 60 | 0.05 |
P.S.I.A. Rare - Revision 2007 | 60 | -0.00 |
P.S.I.A. Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 60 | -0.03 |
P.S.I.A. Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 60 | -0.03 |
P.S.I.A. Rational - Revision 2007 | 60 | -0.04 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 828 | -0.04 |
P.S.I.A. Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 60 | -0.04 |
P.S.I.A. System factor - Revision 2007 | 60 | -0.10 |
Observed behaviour | 73 | -0.10 |
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 66 | -0.10 |
P.S.I.A. True - Revision 2007 | 60 | -0.12 |
P.S.I.A. Cold - Revision 2007 | 60 | -0.12 |
P.S.I.A. Orderly - Revision 2007 | 60 | -0.14 |
P.S.I.A. Introverted - Revision 2007 | 60 | -0.15 |
P.S.I.A. Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 60 | -0.17 |
P.S.I.A. Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 60 | -0.19 |
P.S.I.A. Extreme - Revision 2007 | 60 | -0.21 |
Observed associative horizon | 29 | -0.30 |
In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for both values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.
Raw score | Upward g (N) | Downward g (N) |
---|---|---|
0 | 0.20 (3404) | NaN (0) |
1 | 0.17 (3393) | 0.90 (24) |
2 | 0.02 (3288) | 0.55 (244) |
3 | 0.10 (3062) | 0.29 (582) |
4 | -0.12 (2755) | 0.34 (1638) |
5 | 0.29 (1699) | 0.14 (2511) |
6 | 0.26 (818) | 0.12 (3144) |
7 | NaN (0) | 0.20 (3404) |
Observation: Only downward of Father's educational level 2 (primary school completed) does this statistic have noticeable g loading.