Statistics of Father's educational level

© Paul Cooijmans

Legenda

The educational levels reported by test candidates are encoded as follows:

Scores on Father's educational level as of 12 November 2020

Contents type: Personal information.   

0 ******
1 **********************
2 ***************************************************************
3 **************************************************************************************
4 ***************************************************************************************
*********************************************************************************************
********************************************************************************************
*********
5 ********************************************************************************************
********************************************************************************************
***************************************************************
6 *******************************************************************************************
*********************************************************************
7 ********************************************************************
****************************

Scores by males

n = 832

0 *****
1 ******************
2 **********************************************************
3 ************************************************************************
4 ********************************************************************************
*********************************************************************************
******************************************************************************
5 **********************************************************************************
*********************************************************************************
*******************************************************
6 ********************************************
************************************************************************
*************************
7 *********************************************************
************************

Scores by females

n = 128

0 *
1 ****
2 *****
3 **************
4 ******************************************
5 ****************************
6 *******************
7 ***************

Correlation of Father's educational level with other tests by I.Q. Tests for the High Range

(Test index) Test name n r
(113) The Piper's Test60.59
(77) Analogies #170.58
(51) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #1140.46
(109) The Bonsai Test - Revision 2016340.40
(74) Cooijmans On-Line Test150.37
(76) Analogies subtest of Long Test For Genius (Netherlandic)60.35
(56) Short Test For Genius110.31
(82) Reason370.31
(62) Reason Behind Multiple-Choice300.28
(107) The Alchemist Test170.27
(13) Laaglandse Aanlegtest - Herziening 201640.25
(87) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2620.24
(73) Qoymans Automatic Test #380.21
(85) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 1160.19
(4) A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude270.19
(104) The Final Test - Revision 2013190.19
(72) Qoymans Automatic Test #1110.18
(52) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #2150.17
(10) Genius Association Test970.17
(53) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3810.16
(43) Test For Genius - Revision 2010330.15
(21) Psychometric Qrosswords180.14
(66) Test For Genius - Revision 2004760.14
(26) Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 20041060.13
(33) Problems In Gentle Slopes of the first degree200.13
(112) Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2016360.13
(44) Associative LIMIT620.12
(39) Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2010500.12
(24) Reason - Revision 2008830.11
(105) Space, Time, and Hyperspace - Revision 2016380.11
(2) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 31480.09
(22) Gliaweb Raadselachtig Analogieënproefwerk40.09
(19) Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010830.09
(55) Spatial Insight Test230.09
(111) Test For Genius - Revision 2016290.09
(114) Dicing with death80.08
(27) Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 20041190.08
(65) Long Test For Genius (Netherlandic)50.08
(83) KIT Intelligence Test - first attempts140.07
(80) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #41430.07
(1) Cartoons of Shock450.07
(57) Space, Time, and Hyperspace550.07
(108) Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2016280.06
(54) Test of Shock and Awe160.05
(68) Numbers530.03
(106) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4710.03
(36) Reflections In Peroxide230.03
(25) The Sargasso Test470.03
(40) Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008810.02
(23) Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 20111680.02
(7) The Final Test600.02
(37) Problems In Gentle Slopes of the third degree310.01
(0) Test of the Beheaded Man400.01
(59) Association and Analogies (German)50.00
(45) Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test44-0.01
(11) Isis Test61-0.01
(30) Verbal section of The Marathon Test34-0.01
(46) Labyrinthine LIMIT15-0.02
(16) Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test92-0.05
(32) Spatial section of The Marathon Test45-0.06
(116) Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version)38-0.07
(48) Narcissus' last stand20-0.07
(75) Analogies of Long Test For Genius33-0.08
(3) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #584-0.09
(35) Intelligence Quantifier by assessment69-0.09
(18) The Nemesis Test43-0.09
(69) Odds21-0.10
(110) Cooijmans Intelligence Test 527-0.10
(79) Association subtest of Long Test For Genius38-0.10
(31) Numerical section of The Marathon Test46-0.11
(47) Psychometrically Activated Grids Acerbate Neuroticism12-0.12
(71) Numerical Insight Test13-0.12
(117) The Hammer Of Test-Hungry - Revision 201318-0.13
(28) The Test To End All Tests46-0.13
(103) Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree31-0.14
(42) The Marathon Test30-0.16
(50) Qoymans Automatic Test #210-0.16
(84) Bonsai Test17-0.17
(5) Daedalus Test28-0.19
(63) Long Test For Genius28-0.20
(14) Low Countries Aptitude Test7-0.24
(29) Words20-0.25
(12) Cooijmans On-Line Test - Two-barrelled version32-0.25
(41) The LAW - Letters And Words17-0.32
(15) Letters19-0.34
(81) Association subtest of Long Test For Genius (Netherlandic)6-0.57
(86) Evens9-0.71
(34) De Roskam4-0.76
(8) Female Intelligence Test5-0.77
(49) The Hammer Of Test-Hungry4-0.96

Weighted average of correlations: 0.039 (N = 3404, weighted sum = 131.69)

Conservatively estimated minimum g loading: 0.20

Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.

Correlation of Father's educational level with tests by others

(Test index) Test name n r
(208) California Test of Mental Maturity40.66
(206) W-8780.52
(232) GMAT40.51
(221) National I.Q. Tests40.42
(217) G-test80.41
(225) Logima Strictica 36480.35
(214) Epiq Tests140.28
(241) Ultra Test90.27
(212) Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (raw)230.27
(224) Test of Inductive Reasoning120.22
(226) Logima Strictica 24150.22
(200) American College Testing program130.17
(219) Graduate Record Examination110.16
(201) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales360.14
(218) Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.)260.14
(236) International High IQ Society Miscellaneous tests500.08
(237) Sigma Test210.05
(235) Nonverbal Cognitive Performance Examination390.05
(239) Titan Test170.04
(243) Scholastic Aptitude Test (old)160.03
(204) Chimera High Ability Riddle Test50.03
(229) Mega Test90.02
(240) Strict Logic Spatial Exam 48280.02
(242) Unknown and miscellaneous tests215-0.00
(220) Cattell Culture Fair33-0.02
(234) Strict Logic Sequences Exam I70-0.03
(231) Mysterium Entrance Exam30-0.05
(205) Cito-toets12-0.05
(211) Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version55-0.06
(202) Cattell Verbal7-0.06
(223) Strict Logic Sequences Exam II17-0.15
(238) 916 Test20-0.20
(233) Hoeflin Power Test6-0.23
(247) Advanced Intelligence Test11-0.27
(203) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales for Children8-0.30
(244) Scholastic Aptitude Test (new)10-0.33
(246) Sequentia Numerica Form I13-0.37
(227) Concep-T8-0.59
(209) Drenth number series5-0.60
(230) Omega Contemplative Items Pool7-0.62
(213) Encephalist - R6-0.67
(228) Miller Analogies Test (raw; old version)7-0.74

Weighted average of correlations: 0.020 (N = 960, weighted sum = 19.41)

Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.

Please be aware that correlations with these external tests are in most cases affected (depressed, typically) by one or more of the following: (1) Little overlap with the object test because of the much lower ceilings and inherent ceiling effects of the tests used in regular psychology; (2) Candidates reporting scores selectively, for instance only the higher ones while withholding lower ones; (3) Candidates reporting, or having been reported by psychometricians, incorrect scores.

Correlation of Father's educational level with other tests by I.Q. Tests for the High Range - for females

(Test index) Test name n r
(87) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 240.84
(1) Cartoons of Shock50.81
(7) The Final Test40.72
(26) Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 200440.62
(106) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 450.57
(35) Intelligence Quantifier by assessment70.49
(53) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #390.34
(2) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3140.28
(23) Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011150.22
(10) Genius Association Test60.16
(80) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4150.03
(3) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #550.02
(40) Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 200850.01
(24) Reason - Revision 20085-0.01
(16) Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test4-0.39
(116) Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version)4-0.69
(44) Associative LIMIT4-0.76

Weighted average of correlations: 0.204 (N = 115, weighted sum = 23.51)

Conservatively estimated minimum g loading among females: 0.45

Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.

Estimated loadings of Father's educational level on particular item types

These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.

Typeng loading of Father's educational level on that type
Verbal9040.19
Numerical225-0.16
Spatial3720.18
Logical1630.36
Heterogeneous10840.21

N = 2748

Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.

Balanced g loading = 0.16

National means for Father's educational level

Country n mean score
Hungary26.50
Thailand26.00
Argentina65.83
Malaysia35.67
Russia35.67
India245.58
Bulgaria85.50
Iran45.50
Yugoslavia55.20
Romania65.17
Chile35.00
New_Zealand45.00
Nigeria45.00
Philippines55.00
South_Africa95.00
Switzerland55.00
Poland144.93
Israel74.86
United_States2634.83
Austria124.75
Brazil124.75
Korea_South154.67
Slovenia34.67
Norway134.62
France184.61
Canada284.61
United_Kingdom424.60
Germany674.58
Belgium204.50
Croatia24.50
Serbia24.50
Turkey114.45
Australia174.35
Sweden584.34
Greece244.33
Singapore34.33
Italy194.32
China194.26
Mexico84.25
Finland274.15
Japan74.14
Netherlands784.13
Denmark134.08
Portugal43.75
Hong_Kong53.60
Bosnia_and_Herzegovina43.50
Cuba23.50
Slovakia23.50
Czech_Republic33.00
Spain233.00
Cyprus32.33

For reasons of privacy, only countries with 2 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the unrounded means, and then alphabetic.

Correlation with national I.Q.'s of Father's educational level

Correlation of this test with national average I.Q.'s published by Lynn and Vanhanen:

Correlation of Father's educational level with personal details

Personalia n r
Mother's educational level9550.60
P.S.I.A. Cruel - Revision 2007680.18
Year of birth9610.13
Educational level9610.09
P.S.I.A. Rare - Revision 2007680.08
P.S.I.A. Just - Revision 2007680.07
Disorders (own)9580.06
Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes400.05
P.S.I.A. Aspergoid - Revision 2007680.03
P.S.I.A. Antisocial - Revision 2007680.03
Sex9610.01
P.S.I.A. Neurotic - Revision 200768-0.00
P.S.I.A. Rational - Revision 200768-0.01
P.S.I.A. System factor - Revision 200768-0.03
Disorders (parents and siblings)957-0.04
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms71-0.04
P.S.I.A. Cold - Revision 200768-0.05
Observed behaviour80-0.09
P.S.I.A. Orderly - Revision 200768-0.10
P.S.I.A. Introverted - Revision 200768-0.13
P.S.I.A. True - Revision 200768-0.15
P.S.I.A. Deviance factor - Revision 200768-0.16
P.S.I.A. Ethics factor - Revision 200768-0.19
P.S.I.A. Extreme - Revision 200768-0.20
Observed associative horizon34-0.27

Observation: There is a significant moderate positive correlation of Father's educational level with Mother's educational level, reflecting assortative mating, one presumes. Virtually the same correlation is seen below for both the female and the male candidates separately, which makes sense given that the assortative mating took place before the candidate (child) was conceived, and can therefore not have been affected by the sex of the candidate. The fact that this correlation is so alike within-sex confirms that it is genuine, and also confirms that the statistic was reported correctly on the whole.

Correlation with personal details of Father's educational level - within females

Personalia n r
Mother's educational level1270.61
P.S.I.A. Aspergoid - Revision 200780.57
P.S.I.A. Rare - Revision 200780.55
P.S.I.A. Cold - Revision 200780.36
P.S.I.A. Neurotic - Revision 200780.33
P.S.I.A. Antisocial - Revision 200780.33
P.S.I.A. System factor - Revision 200780.32
P.S.I.A. Orderly - Revision 200780.26
Educational level1280.23
Year of birth1280.19
P.S.I.A. Deviance factor - Revision 200780.17
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms50.14
Disorders (own)1280.12
Observed associative horizon50.08
P.S.I.A. Rational - Revision 200780.06
P.S.I.A. Introverted - Revision 200780.04
P.S.I.A. Just - Revision 20078-0.02
Disorders (parents and siblings)128-0.02
P.S.I.A. Extreme - Revision 20078-0.07
P.S.I.A. Ethics factor - Revision 20078-0.18
P.S.I.A. True - Revision 20078-0.27
Observed behaviour7-0.61
P.S.I.A. Cruel - Revision 20078-0.65

Correlation with personal details of Father's educational level - within males

Personalia n r
Mother's educational level8270.60
P.S.I.A. Cruel - Revision 2007600.19
Year of birth8320.12
Educational level8320.06
Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes400.05
Disorders (own)8290.05
P.S.I.A. Just - Revision 2007600.05
P.S.I.A. Rare - Revision 200760-0.00
P.S.I.A. Neurotic - Revision 200760-0.03
P.S.I.A. Antisocial - Revision 200760-0.03
P.S.I.A. Rational - Revision 200760-0.04
Disorders (parents and siblings)828-0.04
P.S.I.A. Aspergoid - Revision 200760-0.04
P.S.I.A. System factor - Revision 200760-0.10
Observed behaviour73-0.10
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms66-0.10
P.S.I.A. True - Revision 200760-0.12
P.S.I.A. Cold - Revision 200760-0.12
P.S.I.A. Orderly - Revision 200760-0.14
P.S.I.A. Introverted - Revision 200760-0.15
P.S.I.A. Ethics factor - Revision 200760-0.17
P.S.I.A. Deviance factor - Revision 200760-0.19
P.S.I.A. Extreme - Revision 200760-0.21
Observed associative horizon29-0.30

Estimated g factor loadings upward and downward of particular scores

In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for both values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.

Raw scoreUpward g (N)Downward g (N)
00.20 (3404)NaN (0)
10.17 (3393)0.90 (24)
20.02 (3288)0.55 (244)
30.10 (3062)0.29 (582)
4-0.12 (2755)0.34 (1638)
50.29 (1699)0.14 (2511)
60.26 (818)0.12 (3144)
7NaN (0)0.20 (3404)

Observation: Only downward of Father's educational level 2 (primary school completed) does this statistic have noticeable g loading.

Conclusions

  1. There is, on the whole, a tiny positive correlation of Father's educational level with candidate's high-range I.Q. test scores (it is in fact .02 to .04);
  2. Within females, however, there is a small positive correlation of about .20;
  3. Only downward of educational level 2 (primary school completed) there seems to be a somewhat higher correlation with I.Q.;
  4. There is a significant moderate positive correlation of Father's educational level with Mother's educational level, reflecting assortative mating.