The educational levels reported by test candidates are encoded as follows:
Notice: The Associate degree option has been added to the form years after the other options. If you are a test candidate and your highest achieved educational level is Associate, you may inform the Psychometitor or resubmit the test registration form to be certain it is on record.
Contents type: Personal information, observation, or non-cognitive personality test score in numeric form.
Score | Frequency |
---|---|
0 | 5 |
1 | 5 |
2 | 14 |
3 | 102 |
4 | 360 |
4.5 | 3 |
5 | 348 |
6 | 248 |
7 | 100 |
Notice: Frequencies are given as numbers instead of *** here because they are so high that they would run off the screen otherwise.
n = 1023
Score | Frequency |
---|---|
0 | 4 |
1 | 4 |
2 | 10 |
3 | 89 |
4 | 310 |
4.5 | 2 |
5 | 302 |
6 | 215 |
7 | 87 |
n = 159
0 | * |
1 | * |
2 | *** |
3 | ************* |
4 | ************************************************** |
4.5 | * |
5 | ******************************************** |
6 | ********************************* |
7 | ************* |
Test name | n | r | p value |
---|---|---|---|
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the fourth degree | 4 | 0.82 | 0.16 |
Encephalist - R (Xavier Jouve) | 6 | 0.76 | 0.09 |
Analogies subtest of Long Test For Genius (Netherlandic) | 10 | 0.75 | 0.03 |
New York High I.Q. Society tests | 5 | 0.72 | 0.15 |
Tests by Randy Myers (other than Advanced Intelligence Test) | 4 | 0.70 | 0.24 |
Three Sonnets (Heinrich Siemens) | 4 | 0.68 | 0.25 |
Long Test For Genius (Netherlandic) | 9 | 0.68 | 0.05 |
Cattell Culture Fair Intelligence Test 20-R | 4 | 0.67 | 0.25 |
Test of Shock and Awe | 18 | 0.66 | 0.006 |
The Gate | 7 | 0.61 | 0.13 |
Tests by Brendan Harris (aggregate) | 6 | 0.59 | 0.19 |
Divine Psychometry (Matthew Scillitani) | 14 | 0.56 | 0.04 |
F.N.A. (Xavier Jouve) | 4 | 0.56 | 0.34 |
Chimera Test (Bill Bultas) | 4 | 0.55 | 0.34 |
Female Intelligence Test | 6 | 0.54 | 0.22 |
Tickle Tests (tickle.com) | 5 | 0.54 | 0.28 |
Sunesis Test (Rudimar Schmitz) | 4 | 0.49 | 0.40 |
Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test | 71 | 0.48 | 0.00005 |
Spatial section of The Marathon Test | 72 | 0.47 | 0.00008 |
Short Test For Genius | 15 | 0.47 | 0.08 |
Test of the Beheaded Man | 64 | 0.47 | 0.0002 |
Psychometrically Activated Grids Acerbate Neuroticism | 18 | 0.46 | 0.06 |
Random Feickery (Brandon Feick) | 12 | 0.46 | 0.12 |
Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 35 | 0.46 | 0.007 |
Only idiots | 17 | 0.45 | 0.07 |
Concep-T (Laurent Dubois) | 10 | 0.44 | 0.18 |
Numerical section of The Marathon Test | 74 | 0.44 | 0.0002 |
Gliaweb Raadselachtig Analogieproefwerk | 12 | 0.43 | 0.15 |
Cattell Verbal (also known as Cattell B) | 10 | 0.43 | 0.19 |
The Marathon Test | 44 | 0.41 | 0.007 |
A Relaxing Test (David Miller) | 18 | 0.41 | 0.09 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #1 | 17 | 0.41 | 0.10 |
Psychometric Qrosswords | 27 | 0.41 | 0.04 |
De Golfstroomtest - Herziening 2019 | 6 | 0.40 | 0.37 |
Cito-toets | 13 | 0.40 | 0.17 |
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the first degree | 26 | 0.40 | 0.05 |
Drenth number series | 8 | 0.39 | 0.30 |
Association and Analogies (German) | 5 | 0.39 | 0.42 |
The Smell Test | 13 | 0.39 | 0.17 |
Analogies of Long Test For Genius | 43 | 0.38 | 0.02 |
The Alchemist Test (Anas El Husseini) | 43 | 0.36 | 0.02 |
Spatial Insight Test | 25 | 0.35 | 0.09 |
The Nemesis Test | 73 | 0.35 | 0.003 |
Long Test For Genius | 37 | 0.34 | 0.04 |
Dicing with death | 22 | 0.34 | 0.12 |
Tests by Marc-André Nydegger (aggregate) | 6 | 0.33 | 0.46 |
Association subtest of Long Test For Genius | 48 | 0.33 | 0.03 |
European I.Q. Test | 9 | 0.32 | 0.37 |
Advanced Intelligence Test (Randy Myers) | 14 | 0.31 | 0.27 |
Low Countries Aptitude Test | 7 | 0.31 | 0.46 |
Daedalus Test | 43 | 0.30 | 0.06 |
Space, Time, and Hyperspace | 71 | 0.29 | 0.02 |
Cartoons of Shock | 49 | 0.28 | 0.05 |
Narcissus' last stand | 37 | 0.28 | 0.09 |
W-87 (International Society for Philosophical Enquiry) | 9 | 0.28 | 0.42 |
A-22 - Early experimental association test in Netherlandic, 27 items (maximum score 31) | 4 | 0.27 | 0.64 |
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011 | 210 | 0.27 | 0.00007 |
Verbal section of The Marathon Test | 48 | 0.27 | 0.06 |
The Piper's Test | 27 | 0.27 | 0.16 |
Letters | 21 | 0.27 | 0.24 |
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 109 | 0.27 | 0.006 |
Miscellaneous tests | 235 | 0.25 | 0.0001 |
Miller Analogies Test (before 2001; raw) | 7 | 0.24 | 0.54 |
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree | 59 | 0.24 | 0.07 |
The Sargasso Test | 80 | 0.24 | 0.03 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Paul Cooijmans) | 75 | 0.24 | 0.04 |
Analogies #1 | 8 | 0.24 | 0.52 |
Sequentia Numerica Form I (Alexander Herkner) | 13 | 0.24 | 0.40 |
Scholastic Aptitude Test (new) | 12 | 0.24 | 0.44 |
Tests by Xavier Jouve, other than those listed separately (aggregate) | 19 | 0.23 | 0.34 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test 5 | 80 | 0.22 | 0.05 |
Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 77 | 0.22 | 0.05 |
Tests by Greg Grove (aggregate) | 40 | 0.22 | 0.17 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 148 | 0.21 | 0.01 |
De Roskam | 5 | 0.21 | 0.66 |
Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices (I.Q.) | 5 | 0.21 | 0.68 |
Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve) | 40 | 0.21 | 0.19 |
Scholastic Aptitude Test (old) | 18 | 0.20 | 0.40 |
Labyrinthine LIMIT | 33 | 0.20 | 0.26 |
Words | 22 | 0.20 | 0.37 |
Cooijmans On-Line Test - Two-barrelled version | 38 | 0.19 | 0.25 |
The LAW - Letters And Words | 19 | 0.19 | 0.42 |
Reflections In Peroxide | 62 | 0.18 | 0.16 |
Magma Test (Edward Vanhove) | 4 | 0.17 | 0.76 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Jonathan Wai) | 12 | 0.17 | 0.57 |
The Final Test - Revision 2013 | 20 | 0.17 | 0.46 |
Tests by Ivan Ivec (aggregate) | 35 | 0.16 | 0.34 |
Sigma Test (Melão Hindemburg) | 24 | 0.16 | 0.44 |
The Hammer Of Test-Hungry - Revision 2013 | 18 | 0.16 | 0.50 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #2 | 16 | 0.16 | 0.52 |
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (raw) | 28 | 0.16 | 0.40 |
Kvociento (Bram van Kaathoven) | 6 | 0.16 | 0.71 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3 | 207 | 0.16 | 0.03 |
Laaglandse Aanlegtest - Herziening 2016 | 9 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 125 | 0.15 | 0.10 |
The Test To End All Tests | 66 | 0.14 | 0.25 |
Tests by Jason Betts (aggregate) | 28 | 0.14 | 0.46 |
Numerical Insight Test | 13 | 0.14 | 0.64 |
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version) | 43 | 0.14 | 0.37 |
Gliaweb Recycled Intelligence Test | 8 | 0.14 | 0.71 |
Space, Time, and Hyperspace - Revision 2016 | 88 | 0.13 | 0.22 |
Association subtest of Long Test For Genius (Netherlandic) | 11 | 0.13 | 0.68 |
American College Testing program (from October 1989 onward) | 11 | 0.13 | 0.68 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5 | 121 | 0.12 | 0.17 |
Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 134 | 0.12 | 0.16 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4 | 119 | 0.12 | 0.20 |
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 86 | 0.12 | 0.28 |
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the third degree | 69 | 0.11 | 0.37 |
Titan Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 23 | 0.11 | 0.62 |
Graduate Record Examination (prior to October 2001) | 12 | 0.10 | 0.74 |
Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 64 | 0.10 | 0.42 |
The Blue Test (Andres Gomez Emilsson) | 11 | 0.10 | 0.76 |
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 55 | 0.10 | 0.48 |
The Bonsai Test - Revision 2016 | 77 | 0.09 | 0.40 |
American College Testing program (prior to October 1989) | 7 | 0.09 | 0.81 |
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 63 | 0.09 | 0.48 |
Evens | 10 | 0.09 | 0.78 |
Numbers | 58 | 0.08 | 0.52 |
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008 | 117 | 0.08 | 0.38 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 62 | 0.07 | 0.60 |
The Final Test | 69 | 0.06 | 0.62 |
Mega Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 13 | 0.06 | 0.84 |
Test of Inductive Reasoning / J.C.T.I. (Xavier Jouve) | 28 | 0.05 | 0.78 |
Genius Association Test | 124 | 0.05 | 0.62 |
Tests by Iakovos Koukas (aggregate) | 10 | 0.04 | 0.90 |
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales | 50 | 0.03 | 0.81 |
Reason - Revision 2008 | 118 | 0.03 | 0.78 |
Strict Logic Sequences Exam I (Jonathan Wai) | 78 | 0.02 | 0.84 |
Chimera High Ability Riddle Test (Bill Bultas) | 7 | 0.02 | 0.97 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 1 | 19 | 0.01 | 0.97 |
De Laatste Test | 5 | -0.00 | 1.00 |
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.) | 43 | -0.02 | 0.90 |
Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 121 | -0.02 | 0.78 |
Qoymans Automatic Test #2 | 12 | -0.02 | 0.94 |
Isis Test | 94 | -0.04 | 0.71 |
A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude | 51 | -0.04 | 0.78 |
Tests by Paul Laurent Miranda (aggregate) | 17 | -0.05 | 0.84 |
Associative LIMIT | 86 | -0.05 | 0.62 |
Bonsai Test | 17 | -0.08 | 0.76 |
Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström) | 57 | -0.08 | 0.54 |
Tests by Theodosis Prousalis (aggregate) | 14 | -0.12 | 0.66 |
Strict Logic Spatial Exam 48 (Jonathan Wai) | 34 | -0.12 | 0.48 |
916 Test (Laurent Dubois) | 24 | -0.13 | 0.54 |
Odds | 21 | -0.13 | 0.54 |
Cooijmans On-Line Test | 15 | -0.16 | 0.57 |
Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato) | 52 | -0.17 | 0.24 |
International High IQ Society tests (aggregate) | 57 | -0.17 | 0.20 |
Strict Logic Sequences Exam II (Jonathan Wai) | 22 | -0.18 | 0.40 |
Epiq Tests (aggregate) | 53 | -0.19 | 0.16 |
Queendom tests | 12 | -0.21 | 0.50 |
Tests by Nikolaos Soulios (aggregate) | 29 | -0.21 | 0.26 |
Tests by James Dorsey (aggregate) | 10 | -0.22 | 0.50 |
Reason | 38 | -0.26 | 0.12 |
Ultra Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 13 | -0.28 | 0.34 |
G-test (Nikos Lygeros) | 9 | -0.29 | 0.40 |
De Laatste Test - Herziening 2019 | 8 | -0.30 | 0.42 |
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice | 31 | -0.30 | 0.10 |
Logima Strictica 24 (Robert Lato) | 17 | -0.31 | 0.22 |
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales for Children | 12 | -0.33 | 0.27 |
The Hammer Of Test-Hungry | 4 | -0.33 | 0.57 |
Tests by Mislav Predavec (aggregate) | 16 | -0.37 | 0.15 |
Hoeflin Power Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 9 | -0.38 | 0.28 |
Cattell Culture Fair | 40 | -0.40 | 0.01 |
Tests by Arne Andre Gangvik (aggregate) | 5 | -0.43 | 0.38 |
Qoymans Automatic Test #1 | 12 | -0.45 | 0.13 |
Tests by Nicolas Elenas (aggregate) | 16 | -0.45 | 0.08 |
Qoymans Automatic Test #3 | 10 | -0.48 | 0.15 |
Graduate Management Admission Test | 4 | -0.51 | 0.37 |
Stanford-Binet | 6 | -0.54 | 0.24 |
Omega Contemplative Items Pool (Tommy Smith) | 7 | -0.66 | 0.11 |
Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery - Armed Forces Qualification Test | 6 | -0.70 | 0.12 |
California Test of Mental Maturity | 6 | -0.76 | 0.09 |
Weighted mean of correlations: 0.149 (N = 6242)
Estimated g factor loading: 0.39
Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.
Test name | n | r | p value |
---|---|---|---|
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version) | 4 | 0.85 | 0.14 |
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 4 | 0.81 | 0.16 |
Test of the Beheaded Man | 4 | 0.80 | 0.17 |
The Final Test | 5 | 0.69 | 0.17 |
Reason - Revision 2008 | 5 | 0.68 | 0.17 |
Genius Association Test | 6 | 0.65 | 0.14 |
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008 | 5 | 0.63 | 0.20 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 4 | 0.61 | 0.28 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4 | 7 | 0.50 | 0.22 |
Cartoons of Shock | 5 | 0.48 | 0.34 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5 | 5 | 0.40 | 0.42 |
Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 4 | 0.37 | 0.52 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Paul Cooijmans) | 8 | 0.36 | 0.34 |
Miscellaneous tests | 27 | 0.26 | 0.18 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3 | 14 | 0.26 | 0.36 |
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011 | 17 | 0.21 | 0.40 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 15 | 0.18 | 0.50 |
Space, Time, and Hyperspace | 5 | 0.07 | 0.90 |
Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 4 | -0.25 | 0.66 |
Associative LIMIT | 4 | -0.26 | 0.64 |
Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström) | 5 | -0.34 | 0.50 |
Cattell Culture Fair | 6 | -0.46 | 0.30 |
Weighted mean of correlations: 0.300 (N = 163)
Estimated g factor loading among females: 0.55
Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.
Remark: Within females, the correlation of educational level with I.Q. test scores is higher than within males (and females combined).
These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.
Type | n | g loading of Educational level on that type |
---|---|---|
Verbal | 1142 | 0.44 |
Numerical | 396 | 0.38 |
Spatial | 623 | 0.36 |
Logical | 242 | 0.14 |
Heterogeneous | 2033 | 0.42 |
N = 4436
Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.
Balanced g loading = 0.35
Note: Although positive, the correlation of educational level with high-range I.Q. test scores (and therewith its g loading) is much too low to allow for a meaningful "norming" or regression of educational level to I.Q. For high-range test candidates, more education seems to require only marginally more g. This finding is not entirely inconsistent with what one may informally observe when communicating with persons who use academic titles in the high-I.Q. community.
Country | n | mean score |
---|---|---|
Hong_Kong | 6 | 5.8 |
Bosnia_and_Herzegovina | 3 | 5.7 |
South_Africa | 9 | 5.7 |
Serbia | 4 | 5.5 |
Portugal | 6 | 5.3 |
France | 20 | 5.3 |
Austria | 15 | 5.2 |
Slovenia | 5 | 5.2 |
Russia | 6 | 5.2 |
Turkey | 15 | 5.1 |
Germany | 81 | 5.1 |
Belgium | 23 | 5.1 |
Poland | 15 | 5.1 |
India | 27 | 5.0 |
Sweden | 63 | 5.0 |
China | 24 | 5.0 |
Czech_Republic | 4 | 5.0 |
Greece | 27 | 5.0 |
Iran | 5 | 5.0 |
Mexico | 8 | 5.0 |
Romania | 8 | 5.0 |
Japan | 13 | 4.9 |
Bulgaria | 8 | 4.9 |
New_Zealand | 6 | 4.8 |
Spain | 26 | 4.8 |
Singapore | 5 | 4.8 |
United_Kingdom | 55 | 4.8 |
Finland | 32 | 4.8 |
Unknown | 9 | 4.8 |
Italy | 22 | 4.8 |
Argentina | 7 | 4.7 |
Netherlands | 102 | 4.7 |
United_States | 330 | 4.7 |
Switzerland | 10 | 4.7 |
Canada | 34 | 4.7 |
Chile | 3 | 4.7 |
Cyprus | 3 | 4.7 |
Malaysia | 3 | 4.7 |
Philippines | 6 | 4.7 |
Norway | 16 | 4.6 |
Denmark | 13 | 4.6 |
Australia | 22 | 4.6 |
Yugoslavia | 5 | 4.6 |
Israel | 7 | 4.4 |
Nigeria | 5 | 4.4 |
Brazil | 13 | 4.4 |
Korea_South | 21 | 4.3 |
Cuba | 3 | 4.0 |
Thailand | 3 | 4.0 |
Total number of countries: 73
For reasons of privacy, only countries with 3 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the unrounded means, and then alphabetic.
Personalia | n | r | p value |
---|---|---|---|
Observed behaviour | 111 | 0.24 | 0.01 |
Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes | 62 | 0.15 | 0.26 |
PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 101 | 0.09 | 0.36 |
PSIA True - Revision 2007 | 101 | 0.09 | 0.36 |
Father's educational level | 1087 | 0.07 | 0.02 |
PSIA Orderly - Revision 2007 | 101 | 0.03 | 0.74 |
Observed associative horizon | 47 | 0.03 | 0.84 |
Sex | 1184 | 0.02 | 0.54 |
Mother's educational level | 1098 | -0.01 | 0.74 |
PSIA Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 101 | -0.03 | 0.76 |
PSIA Cruel - Revision 2007 | 101 | -0.06 | 0.54 |
PSIA Extreme - Revision 2007 | 101 | -0.11 | 0.28 |
PSIA Rare - Revision 2007 | 101 | -0.12 | 0.24 |
PSIA Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 101 | -0.13 | 0.20 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 1146 | -0.14 | 0.000005 |
PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 101 | -0.14 | 0.15 |
Disorders (own) | 1154 | -0.15 | 0.0000002 |
PSIA Just - Revision 2007 | 101 | -0.16 | 0.11 |
PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 101 | -0.17 | 0.09 |
PSIA Rational - Revision 2007 | 101 | -0.18 | 0.07 |
PSIA System factor - Revision 2007 | 101 | -0.21 | 0.03 |
PSIA Introverted - Revision 2007 | 101 | -0.27 | 0.006 |
PSIA Cold - Revision 2007 | 101 | -0.27 | 0.006 |
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 110 | -0.32 | 0.0008 |
Year of birth | 1176 | -0.45 | ≈ 0 |
Significant negative correlates of educational level are year of birth (obvious) and Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms, as well as several other indicators of deviance and disorder. Observed behaviour is the only sizeable significant positive correlate.
Personalia | n | r | p value |
---|---|---|---|
PSIA Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 11 | 0.57 | 0.07 |
PSIA Just - Revision 2007 | 11 | 0.50 | 0.12 |
PSIA Cold - Revision 2007 | 11 | 0.44 | 0.17 |
PSIA Rare - Revision 2007 | 11 | 0.42 | 0.18 |
PSIA Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 11 | 0.42 | 0.18 |
PSIA System factor - Revision 2007 | 11 | 0.42 | 0.19 |
PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 11 | 0.35 | 0.27 |
PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 11 | 0.24 | 0.44 |
PSIA True - Revision 2007 | 11 | 0.23 | 0.46 |
PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 11 | 0.21 | 0.52 |
Father's educational level | 136 | 0.19 | 0.03 |
PSIA Extreme - Revision 2007 | 11 | 0.12 | 0.68 |
Mother's educational level | 135 | 0.11 | 0.18 |
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 12 | 0.08 | 0.78 |
PSIA Cruel - Revision 2007 | 11 | 0.01 | 0.97 |
Disorders (own) | 149 | -0.06 | 0.42 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 146 | -0.07 | 0.37 |
PSIA Introverted - Revision 2007 | 11 | -0.15 | 0.64 |
Observed associative horizon | 6 | -0.25 | 0.57 |
PSIA Orderly - Revision 2007 | 11 | -0.26 | 0.42 |
Year of birth | 155 | -0.32 | 0.00006 |
PSIA Rational - Revision 2007 | 11 | -0.37 | 0.25 |
Observed behaviour | 10 | -0.52 | 0.12 |
While not significant, several differences can be observed with the within-males correlations: Some negative correlates in males are positive in females, and vice versa.
Personalia | n | r | p value |
---|---|---|---|
Observed behaviour | 101 | 0.26 | 0.01 |
Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes | 60 | 0.12 | 0.36 |
Observed associative horizon | 41 | 0.07 | 0.66 |
Father's educational level | 949 | 0.06 | 0.08 |
PSIA Orderly - Revision 2007 | 90 | 0.06 | 0.60 |
PSIA True - Revision 2007 | 90 | 0.04 | 0.71 |
PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 90 | 0.04 | 0.74 |
PSIA Cruel - Revision 2007 | 90 | -0.02 | 0.87 |
Mother's educational level | 961 | -0.03 | 0.42 |
PSIA Rational - Revision 2007 | 90 | -0.10 | 0.36 |
PSIA Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 90 | -0.13 | 0.20 |
PSIA Just - Revision 2007 | 90 | -0.14 | 0.19 |
PSIA Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 90 | -0.14 | 0.18 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 998 | -0.14 | 0.000006 |
PSIA Extreme - Revision 2007 | 90 | -0.16 | 0.13 |
Disorders (own) | 1003 | -0.17 | 0.0000001 |
PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 90 | -0.20 | 0.06 |
PSIA Rare - Revision 2007 | 90 | -0.21 | 0.05 |
PSIA System factor - Revision 2007 | 90 | -0.22 | 0.04 |
PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 90 | -0.23 | 0.03 |
PSIA Introverted - Revision 2007 | 90 | -0.30 | 0.005 |
PSIA Cold - Revision 2007 | 90 | -0.32 | 0.003 |
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 98 | -0.37 | 0.0003 |
Year of birth | 1019 | -0.47 | ≈ 0 |
In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for these values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.
Below 1st quartile (raw 4.0) | 0.36 (n = 2318) |
---|---|
Below median (raw 5.0) | 0.30 (n = 4286) |
Above median (raw 5.0) | 0.34 (n = 3719) |
Above 3rd quartile (raw 6.0) | 0.25 (n = 1784) |
Notice: While the g loading of educational level in the high range is low overall, it is highest below the 1st quartile (secondary school completed).
Mistaken responses to a previous version of this report have made the following disclaimer necessary: This report deals only with statistics of high-range test candidates. Within the general population, there is no doubt a much higher correlation of educational level with I.Q. than reported for the high-range population. This difference has to do with phenomena like attenuation due to restriction of range, and Spearman's "law of diminishing returns" regarding g. Incorrect reporting by candidates may also play a role; some seem to report higher educational levels than they have, and notorious is the unauthorized used of the doctor title in high-I.Q. circles.