For many years, candidates have been asked to report whether any psychiatric disorders occur in them. Below are the available statistics of that field, when "yes" is coded as 1 and "no" is coded as 0. In addition, the value of 2 has been assigned to candidates in whom serious disordered behaviour has been directly observed by the test scorer.
Contents type: Personal information, observation, or non-cognitive personality test score in numeric form.
| Score | Frequency |
|---|---|
| 0 | 857 |
| 1 | 318 |
| 2 | 21 |
Notice that the male and female means are about equal.
n = 1034
| Score | Frequency |
|---|---|
| 0 | 746 |
| 1 | 270 |
| 2 | 18 |
n = 157
| Score | Frequency |
|---|---|
| 0 | 110 |
| 1 | 44 |
| 2 | 3 |
| Test name | n | r | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Magma Test (Edward Vanhove) | 4 | 0.87 | 0.13 |
| California Test of Mental Maturity | 7 | 0.80 | 0.05 |
| Stanford-Binet | 6 | 0.75 | 0.09 |
| Graduate Record Examination (prior to October 2001) | 12 | 0.72 | 0.02 |
| American College Testing program (prior to October 1989) | 7 | 0.67 | 0.10 |
| Cattell Verbal (also known as Cattell B) | 12 | 0.64 | 0.03 |
| G-test (Nikos Lygeros) | 9 | 0.61 | 0.08 |
| New York High I.Q. Society tests | 5 | 0.50 | 0.32 |
| Tests by Marc-André Nydegger (aggregate) | 6 | 0.48 | 0.28 |
| Tickle Tests (tickle.com) | 5 | 0.42 | 0.40 |
| Graduate Management Admission Test | 4 | 0.42 | 0.46 |
| Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery - Armed Forces Qualification Test | 5 | 0.41 | 0.42 |
| De Roskam | 5 | 0.40 | 0.42 |
| Tests by Nicolas Elenas (aggregate) | 16 | 0.38 | 0.13 |
| Female Intelligence Test | 6 | 0.38 | 0.40 |
| Mega Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 14 | 0.31 | 0.26 |
| Cooijmans On-Line Test | 16 | 0.30 | 0.25 |
| Titan Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 23 | 0.29 | 0.18 |
| Laaglandse Aanlegtest - Herziening 2016 | 9 | 0.28 | 0.42 |
| Chimera High Ability Riddle Test (Bill Bultas) | 6 | 0.28 | 0.54 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Jonathan Wai) | 12 | 0.26 | 0.40 |
| Evens | 10 | 0.25 | 0.44 |
| Scholastic Aptitude Test (old) | 19 | 0.24 | 0.30 |
| Encephalist - R (Xavier Jouve) | 6 | 0.24 | 0.60 |
| Qoymans Automatic Test #2 | 13 | 0.23 | 0.42 |
| Cattell Culture Fair | 40 | 0.21 | 0.18 |
| Epiq Tests (aggregate) | 54 | 0.20 | 0.14 |
| Cattell Culture Fair Intelligence Test 20-R | 4 | 0.19 | 0.74 |
| F.N.A. (Xavier Jouve) | 4 | 0.18 | 0.76 |
| Tests by James Dorsey (aggregate) | 10 | 0.17 | 0.60 |
| The Gate | 7 | 0.17 | 0.66 |
| A-22 - Early experimental association test in Netherlandic, 27 items (maximum score 31) | 4 | 0.17 | 0.76 |
| Strict Logic Spatial Exam 48 (Jonathan Wai) | 34 | 0.16 | 0.36 |
| Bonsai Test | 17 | 0.16 | 0.52 |
| Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.) | 42 | 0.15 | 0.32 |
| Ultra Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 11 | 0.15 | 0.64 |
| Drenth number series | 7 | 0.10 | 0.81 |
| Association subtest of Long Test For Genius | 47 | 0.08 | 0.62 |
| Test of Shock and Awe | 19 | 0.07 | 0.76 |
| Qoymans Automatic Test #3 | 10 | 0.04 | 0.90 |
| Strict Logic Sequences Exam II (Jonathan Wai) | 23 | 0.04 | 0.84 |
| Omega Contemplative Items Pool (Tommy Smith) | 7 | 0.04 | 0.92 |
| A Relaxing Test (David Miller) | 19 | 0.03 | 0.90 |
| Dicing with death | 22 | 0.03 | 0.90 |
| Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (raw) | 26 | 0.02 | 0.92 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Paul Cooijmans) | 74 | 0.02 | 0.90 |
| Analogies of Long Test For Genius | 41 | 0.01 | 0.92 |
| Reason - Revision 2008 | 119 | 0.01 | 0.87 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 1 | 18 | 0.01 | 0.94 |
| Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato) | 54 | 0.01 | 0.94 |
| Tests by Xavier Jouve, other than those listed separately (aggregate) | 19 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Genius Association Test | 124 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| The Smell Test | 13 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Sequentia Numerica Form I (Alexander Herkner) | 13 | -0.00 | 1.00 |
| Odds | 21 | -0.00 | 1.00 |
| Labyrinthine LIMIT | 33 | -0.01 | 0.94 |
| Association subtest of Long Test For Genius (Netherlandic) | 7 | -0.02 | 0.97 |
| Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 78 | -0.02 | 0.87 |
| Strict Logic Sequences Exam I (Jonathan Wai) | 79 | -0.02 | 0.84 |
| International High IQ Society tests (aggregate) | 56 | -0.03 | 0.84 |
| Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008 | 119 | -0.03 | 0.74 |
| Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 110 | -0.04 | 0.71 |
| The Final Test | 69 | -0.04 | 0.76 |
| The Bonsai Test - Revision 2016 | 79 | -0.04 | 0.74 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test 5 | 81 | -0.04 | 0.71 |
| Tests by Nikolaos Soulios (aggregate) | 30 | -0.04 | 0.81 |
| Tests by Paul Laurent Miranda (aggregate) | 18 | -0.04 | 0.84 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 148 | -0.05 | 0.57 |
| Three Sonnets (Heinrich Siemens) | 5 | -0.05 | 0.92 |
| Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström) | 58 | -0.05 | 0.71 |
| Cartoons of Shock | 49 | -0.05 | 0.71 |
| Associative LIMIT | 86 | -0.06 | 0.57 |
| Sigma Test (Melão Hindemburg) | 26 | -0.06 | 0.76 |
| Reason Behind Multiple-Choice | 31 | -0.06 | 0.74 |
| The Piper's Test | 27 | -0.06 | 0.74 |
| Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 126 | -0.07 | 0.42 |
| Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 137 | -0.07 | 0.38 |
| Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 56 | -0.09 | 0.50 |
| Tests by Jason Betts (aggregate) | 28 | -0.09 | 0.64 |
| Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 36 | -0.10 | 0.57 |
| Short Test For Genius | 13 | -0.10 | 0.74 |
| Only idiots | 17 | -0.11 | 0.66 |
| Reflections In Peroxide | 63 | -0.11 | 0.38 |
| Scholastic Aptitude Test (new) | 13 | -0.11 | 0.68 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5 | 123 | -0.11 | 0.20 |
| Spatial section of The Marathon Test | 73 | -0.12 | 0.32 |
| Reason | 38 | -0.12 | 0.46 |
| Long Test For Genius | 35 | -0.12 | 0.48 |
| Problems In Gentle Slopes of the third degree | 70 | -0.12 | 0.30 |
| Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve) | 41 | -0.13 | 0.40 |
| Hoeflin Power Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 8 | -0.14 | 0.71 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 62 | -0.15 | 0.26 |
| Test of the Beheaded Man | 64 | -0.15 | 0.25 |
| The Test To End All Tests | 67 | -0.15 | 0.24 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4 | 120 | -0.15 | 0.10 |
| The Nemesis Test | 72 | -0.16 | 0.18 |
| Logima Strictica 24 (Robert Lato) | 19 | -0.16 | 0.50 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3 | 208 | -0.16 | 0.02 |
| Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales for Children | 12 | -0.16 | 0.60 |
| Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 121 | -0.17 | 0.06 |
| Isis Test | 93 | -0.17 | 0.10 |
| Problems In Gentle Slopes of the first degree | 26 | -0.17 | 0.38 |
| Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 65 | -0.18 | 0.15 |
| Tests by Ivan Ivec (aggregate) | 37 | -0.18 | 0.28 |
| Numbers | 54 | -0.18 | 0.18 |
| A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude | 52 | -0.19 | 0.18 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #2 | 17 | -0.19 | 0.46 |
| Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011 | 212 | -0.19 | 0.006 |
| Test of Inductive Reasoning / J.C.T.I. (Xavier Jouve) | 28 | -0.20 | 0.30 |
| Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 88 | -0.20 | 0.07 |
| Qoymans Automatic Test #1 | 14 | -0.20 | 0.48 |
| Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree | 60 | -0.20 | 0.12 |
| Space, Time, and Hyperspace - Revision 2016 | 90 | -0.20 | 0.06 |
| Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test | 72 | -0.20 | 0.09 |
| Psychometric Qrosswords | 27 | -0.21 | 0.28 |
| Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version) | 43 | -0.21 | 0.16 |
| Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 64 | -0.22 | 0.08 |
| Space, Time, and Hyperspace | 66 | -0.22 | 0.08 |
| The Final Test - Revision 2013 | 20 | -0.22 | 0.34 |
| The Hammer Of Test-Hungry - Revision 2013 | 18 | -0.22 | 0.37 |
| Daedalus Test | 43 | -0.22 | 0.15 |
| Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales | 54 | -0.22 | 0.10 |
| Narcissus' last stand | 37 | -0.24 | 0.16 |
| Analogies subtest of Long Test For Genius (Netherlandic) | 7 | -0.25 | 0.54 |
| The Sargasso Test | 81 | -0.25 | 0.03 |
| Problems In Gentle Slopes of the fourth degree | 4 | -0.26 | 0.64 |
| Tests by Mislav Predavec (aggregate) | 17 | -0.26 | 0.30 |
| 916 Test (Laurent Dubois) | 25 | -0.27 | 0.19 |
| Verbal section of The Marathon Test | 49 | -0.27 | 0.06 |
| Analogies #1 | 9 | -0.27 | 0.44 |
| Cito-toets | 13 | -0.29 | 0.30 |
| Miscellaneous tests | 252 | -0.29 | 0.000003 |
| Numerical Insight Test | 13 | -0.30 | 0.30 |
| W-87 (International Society for Philosophical Enquiry) | 9 | -0.30 | 0.38 |
| Spatial Insight Test | 25 | -0.31 | 0.13 |
| The Alchemist Test (Anas El Husseini) | 44 | -0.32 | 0.04 |
| Numerical section of The Marathon Test | 75 | -0.32 | 0.006 |
| Tests by Greg Grove (aggregate) | 41 | -0.32 | 0.04 |
| Letters | 21 | -0.33 | 0.14 |
| European I.Q. Test | 9 | -0.33 | 0.36 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #1 | 18 | -0.34 | 0.16 |
| The Marathon Test | 44 | -0.35 | 0.02 |
| De Laatste Test | 5 | -0.35 | 0.48 |
| De Laatste Test - Herziening 2019 | 7 | -0.37 | 0.37 |
| Divine Psychometry (Matthew Scillitani) | 14 | -0.37 | 0.18 |
| The LAW - Letters And Words | 19 | -0.38 | 0.10 |
| Long Test For Genius (Netherlandic) | 6 | -0.39 | 0.38 |
| Random Feickery (Brandon Feick) | 12 | -0.42 | 0.16 |
| Words | 22 | -0.43 | 0.05 |
| Cooijmans On-Line Test - Two-barrelled version | 39 | -0.44 | 0.007 |
| Tests by Brendan Harris (aggregate) | 6 | -0.45 | 0.32 |
| Psychometrically Activated Grids Acerbate Neuroticism | 18 | -0.47 | 0.05 |
| Gliaweb Raadselachtig Analogieproefwerk | 12 | -0.47 | 0.12 |
| The Blue Test (Andres Gomez Emilsson) | 11 | -0.49 | 0.12 |
| Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices (I.Q.) | 5 | -0.50 | 0.32 |
| Miller Analogies Test (before 2001; raw) | 7 | -0.54 | 0.18 |
| Gliaweb Recycled Intelligence Test | 8 | -0.56 | 0.14 |
| American College Testing program (from October 1989 onward) | 11 | -0.56 | 0.08 |
| Advanced Intelligence Test (Randy Myers) | 15 | -0.59 | 0.03 |
| Tests by Theodosis Prousalis (aggregate) | 14 | -0.59 | 0.03 |
| Queendom tests | 11 | -0.60 | 0.06 |
| Association and Analogies (German) | 5 | -0.61 | 0.24 |
| Concep-T (Laurent Dubois) | 10 | -0.67 | 0.05 |
| Tests by Iakovos Koukas (aggregate) | 10 | -0.78 | 0.02 |
| Low Countries Aptitude Test | 7 | -0.81 | 0.05 |
| Tests by Arne Andre Gangvik (aggregate) | 5 | -0.99 | 0.05 |
Weighted mean of correlations: -0.115 (N = 6266)
Estimated g factor loading: -0.34
Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.
The negative correlation of disorders with I.Q. test scores and g is a long-standing observation. Given this long history and huge amount of data, it seems safe to conclude now that -.34 is roughly the real value of the g loading of having a psychiatric disorder, at least on high-range tests. Over the full range of intelligence, g loadings are generally larger than in restricted ranges due to the statistical phenomenon of attenuation through restriction of range, so that in society at large it must be feared that those with psychiatric disorders have an even greater disadvantage on g-loaded tasks than this -.34 value suggests.
| Test name | n | r | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cattell Culture Fair | 6 | 0.74 | 0.10 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 4 | 0.67 | 0.25 |
| Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011 | 17 | 0.44 | 0.08 |
| Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 4 | 0.38 | 0.50 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5 | 5 | 0.18 | 0.71 |
| Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 4 | 0.15 | 0.78 |
| Genius Association Test | 6 | -0.07 | 0.87 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 15 | -0.08 | 0.76 |
| Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008 | 5 | -0.19 | 0.71 |
| Miscellaneous tests | 29 | -0.31 | 0.10 |
| Space, Time, and Hyperspace | 4 | -0.32 | 0.60 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3 | 14 | -0.38 | 0.17 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4 | 7 | -0.42 | 0.30 |
| Reason - Revision 2008 | 5 | -0.43 | 0.38 |
| Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version) | 4 | -0.58 | 0.32 |
| Cartoons of Shock | 5 | -0.58 | 0.25 |
| Associative LIMIT | 4 | -0.63 | 0.27 |
| Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 4 | -0.64 | 0.27 |
| The Final Test | 5 | -0.76 | 0.12 |
| Test of the Beheaded Man | 4 | -0.80 | 0.17 |
| Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström) | 4 | -0.93 | 0.11 |
Weighted mean of correlations: -0.172 (N = 155)
Estimated g factor loading among females: -0.42
Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.
While the correlation within females is larger (negative) than the overall correlation, this is barely significant, so it should not be concluded that this is a real sex difference.
These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.
| Type | n | g loading of Disorders (own) on that type |
|---|---|---|
| Verbal | 1139 | -0.31 |
| Numerical | 396 | -0.34 |
| Spatial | 627 | -0.36 |
| Logical | 244 | -0.23 |
| Heterogeneous | 2041 | -0.35 |
N = 4447
Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.
Balanced g loading = -0.32
| Country | n | mean score |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 0.8 |
| Thailand | 3 | 0.7 |
| Australia | 22 | 0.5 |
| United_Kingdom | 58 | 0.4 |
| Argentina | 7 | 0.4 |
| New_Zealand | 7 | 0.4 |
| Finland | 33 | 0.4 |
| Portugal | 5 | 0.4 |
| Singapore | 5 | 0.4 |
| Switzerland | 8 | 0.4 |
| Canada | 36 | 0.4 |
| United_States | 330 | 0.3 |
| Austria | 15 | 0.3 |
| Brazil | 12 | 0.3 |
| Cuba | 3 | 0.3 |
| Cyprus | 3 | 0.3 |
| Malaysia | 3 | 0.3 |
| Norway | 16 | 0.3 |
| Netherlands | 99 | 0.3 |
| Japan | 14 | 0.3 |
| Korea_South | 21 | 0.3 |
| Poland | 15 | 0.3 |
| Greece | 27 | 0.3 |
| Belgium | 24 | 0.3 |
| Czech_Republic | 4 | 0.3 |
| Mexico | 8 | 0.3 |
| Sweden | 65 | 0.2 |
| France | 21 | 0.2 |
| Germany | 80 | 0.2 |
| China | 26 | 0.2 |
| Denmark | 13 | 0.2 |
| South_Africa | 9 | 0.2 |
| India | 28 | 0.2 |
| Italy | 24 | 0.2 |
| Turkey | 15 | 0.2 |
| Philippines | 6 | 0.2 |
| Russia | 6 | 0.2 |
| Israel | 7 | 0.1 |
| Bulgaria | 8 | 0.1 |
| Spain | 26 | 0.1 |
| Bosnia_and_Herzegovina | 3 | 0.0 |
| Chile | 3 | 0.0 |
| Hong_Kong | 6 | 0.0 |
| Iran | 5 | 0.0 |
| Nigeria | 5 | 0.0 |
| Romania | 8 | 0.0 |
| Serbia | 4 | 0.0 |
| Slovenia | 4 | 0.0 |
| Yugoslavia | 5 | 0.0 |
Total number of countries: 73
For reasons of privacy, only countries with 3 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the unrounded means, and then alphabetic.
| Personalia | n | r | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 125 | 0.43 | 0.000002 |
| Disorders (parents and siblings) | 1147 | 0.40 | ≈ 0 |
| Observed associative horizon | 48 | 0.25 | 0.08 |
| PSIA Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 103 | 0.19 | 0.05 |
| PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 103 | 0.12 | 0.22 |
| PSIA Cruel - Revision 2007 | 103 | 0.10 | 0.34 |
| Year of birth | 1182 | 0.09 | 0.002 |
| PSIA Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 103 | 0.08 | 0.40 |
| PSIA Rare - Revision 2007 | 103 | 0.06 | 0.52 |
| Father's educational level | 1085 | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes | 62 | 0.06 | 0.64 |
| Mother's educational level | 1096 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| PSIA Orderly - Revision 2007 | 103 | 0.05 | 0.62 |
| PSIA System factor - Revision 2007 | 103 | -0.01 | 0.90 |
| PSIA Just - Revision 2007 | 103 | -0.02 | 0.87 |
| Sex | 1193 | -0.02 | 0.57 |
| PSIA Introverted - Revision 2007 | 103 | -0.02 | 0.84 |
| PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 103 | -0.02 | 0.81 |
| PSIA Cold - Revision 2007 | 103 | -0.04 | 0.68 |
| PSIA True - Revision 2007 | 103 | -0.04 | 0.66 |
| PSIA Extreme - Revision 2007 | 103 | -0.07 | 0.50 |
| PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 103 | -0.07 | 0.46 |
| PSIA Rational - Revision 2007 | 103 | -0.07 | 0.46 |
| Educational level | 1154 | -0.15 | 0.0000002 |
| Observed behaviour | 114 | -0.16 | 0.09 |
The Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms and Disorders in parents and siblings are the best predictors of disorders by far. Educational level is a significant negative correlate.
| Personalia | n | r | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 14 | 0.80 | 0.004 |
| Observed associative horizon | 8 | 0.77 | 0.04 |
| Disorders (parents and siblings) | 147 | 0.37 | 0.000008 |
| PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 10 | 0.36 | 0.28 |
| PSIA Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 10 | 0.35 | 0.30 |
| Father's educational level | 136 | 0.15 | 0.09 |
| Mother's educational level | 135 | 0.11 | 0.19 |
| PSIA Just - Revision 2007 | 10 | 0.09 | 0.78 |
| PSIA Rare - Revision 2007 | 10 | 0.08 | 0.81 |
| PSIA Introverted - Revision 2007 | 10 | 0.06 | 0.84 |
| PSIA Orderly - Revision 2007 | 10 | 0.06 | 0.87 |
| Observed behaviour | 11 | 0.04 | 0.90 |
| Year of birth | 152 | 0.03 | 0.68 |
| PSIA System factor - Revision 2007 | 10 | 0.02 | 0.94 |
| PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 10 | -0.04 | 0.92 |
| PSIA Cold - Revision 2007 | 10 | -0.04 | 0.90 |
| Educational level | 149 | -0.06 | 0.42 |
| PSIA Cruel - Revision 2007 | 10 | -0.08 | 0.78 |
| PSIA Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 10 | -0.20 | 0.54 |
| PSIA Extreme - Revision 2007 | 10 | -0.21 | 0.52 |
| PSIA Rational - Revision 2007 | 10 | -0.23 | 0.48 |
| PSIA True - Revision 2007 | 10 | -0.46 | 0.17 |
| PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 10 | -0.47 | 0.16 |
| Personalia | n | r | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Disorders (parents and siblings) | 998 | 0.41 | ≈ 0 |
| Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 108 | 0.40 | 0.00004 |
| PSIA Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 93 | 0.18 | 0.08 |
| Observed associative horizon | 40 | 0.17 | 0.28 |
| PSIA Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 93 | 0.11 | 0.30 |
| PSIA Cruel - Revision 2007 | 93 | 0.10 | 0.34 |
| Year of birth | 1026 | 0.10 | 0.001 |
| PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 93 | 0.10 | 0.36 |
| PSIA Rare - Revision 2007 | 93 | 0.06 | 0.57 |
| PSIA Orderly - Revision 2007 | 93 | 0.05 | 0.64 |
| Father's educational level | 947 | 0.05 | 0.12 |
| Mother's educational level | 959 | 0.05 | 0.14 |
| Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes | 61 | 0.05 | 0.71 |
| PSIA True - Revision 2007 | 93 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 93 | -0.02 | 0.84 |
| PSIA System factor - Revision 2007 | 93 | -0.02 | 0.81 |
| PSIA Introverted - Revision 2007 | 93 | -0.03 | 0.78 |
| PSIA Just - Revision 2007 | 93 | -0.03 | 0.76 |
| PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 93 | -0.04 | 0.68 |
| PSIA Cold - Revision 2007 | 93 | -0.05 | 0.66 |
| PSIA Extreme - Revision 2007 | 93 | -0.05 | 0.60 |
| PSIA Rational - Revision 2007 | 93 | -0.07 | 0.48 |
| Educational level | 1003 | -0.17 | 0.0000001 |
| Observed behaviour | 103 | -0.18 | 0.07 |