104 | * |
110 | ** |
116 | * |
118 | * |
119 | * |
120 | *** |
122 | * |
123 | * |
124 | * |
126 | ** |
127 | * |
130 | * |
131 | * |
132 | * |
133 | ** |
134 | ** |
135 | ****** |
136 | * |
137 | * |
138 | ** |
139 | *** |
140 | ** |
141 | *** |
143 | * |
145 | ** |
146 | *** |
147 | ** |
148 | * |
150 | ***** |
152 | * |
153 | * |
156 | * |
157 | * |
159 | ** |
(Test index) Test name | n | r |
---|---|---|
(44) Associative LIMIT | 3 | 0.99 |
(86) Evens | 3 | 0.69 |
(54) Test of Shock and Awe | 3 | 0.59 |
(10) Genius Association Test | 9 | 0.47 |
(75) Analogies of Long Test For Genius | 5 | 0.46 |
(80) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 11 | 0.45 |
(16) Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 7 | 0.34 |
(63) Long Test For Genius | 5 | 0.32 |
(66) Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 7 | 0.27 |
(2) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3 | 6 | 0.27 |
(27) Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 8 | 0.26 |
(87) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 8 | 0.26 |
(28) The Test To End All Tests | 3 | 0.21 |
(25) The Sargasso Test | 3 | 0.20 |
(26) Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 8 | 0.19 |
(35) Intelligence Quantifier by assessment | 14 | 0.18 |
(79) Association subtest of Long Test For Genius | 6 | 0.08 |
(85) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 1 | 4 | 0.06 |
(68) Numbers | 8 | 0.06 |
(56) Short Test For Genius | 3 | 0.05 |
(51) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #1 | 8 | 0.03 |
(57) Space, Time, and Hyperspace | 11 | 0.02 |
(53) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 | 7 | -0.04 |
(7) The Final Test | 9 | -0.12 |
(52) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #2 | 5 | -0.19 |
(69) Odds | 3 | -0.19 |
(84) Bonsai Test | 3 | -0.24 |
(82) Reason | 3 | -0.99 |
(62) Reason Behind Multiple-Choice | 3 | -0.99 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.155
Conservatively estimated minimum g loading: 0.39
Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 3 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.
(Test index) Test name | n | r |
---|---|---|
(227) Concep-T | 3 | 1.00 |
(245) Stanford-Binet | 4 | 0.99 |
(209) Drenth number series | 3 | 0.99 |
(204) Chimera High Ability Riddle Test | 3 | 0.97 |
(238) 916 Test | 3 | 0.96 |
(220) Cattell Culture Fair | 7 | 0.95 |
(248) Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version) | 3 | 0.92 |
(225) Logima Strictica 36 | 4 | 0.76 |
(236) International High IQ Society Miscellaneous tests | 8 | 0.75 |
(219) Graduate Record Examination | 3 | 0.73 |
(231) Mysterium Entrance Exam | 6 | 0.62 |
(218) Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.) | 5 | 0.57 |
(243) Scholastic Aptitude Test (old) | 6 | 0.55 |
(242) Unknown and miscellaneous tests | 21 | 0.44 |
(212) Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (raw) | 3 | -0.19 |
(211) Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version | 4 | -0.19 |
(235) Nonverbal Cognitive Performance Examination | 3 | -0.26 |
(230) Omega Contemplative Items Pool | 6 | -0.26 |
(247) Advanced Intelligence Test | 3 | -0.48 |
(206) W-87 | 6 | -0.64 |
(229) Mega Test | 3 | -0.79 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.413
Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 3 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.
Please be aware that correlations with these external tests are in most cases affected (depressed, typically) by one or more of the following: (1) Little overlap with the object test because of the much lower ceilings and inherent ceiling effects of the tests used in regular psychology; (2) Candidates reporting scores selectively, for instance only the higher ones while withholding lower ones; (3) Candidates reporting, or having been reported by psychometricians, incorrect scores.
These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.
Type | g loading of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales on that type |
---|---|
Verbal | 0.41 |
Numerical | 0.37 |
Spatial | 0.43 |
Logical | -1.00 |
Heterogeneous | 0.43 |
Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.
Balanced g loading = 0.13
Country | n | median score |
---|---|---|
United_Kingdom | 2 | 154.0 |
Netherlands | 5 | 139.0 |
India | 2 | 137.0 |
United_States | 26 | 137.0 |
Finland | 3 | 110.0 |
For reasons of privacy, only countries with 2 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the medians, and then alphabetic.
Correlation of this test with national average I.Q.'s published by Lynn and Vanhanen:
Personalia | n | r |
---|---|---|
P.S.I.A. Orderly | 13 | 0.39 |
P.S.I.A. True | 13 | 0.27 |
P.S.I.A. Extreme | 13 | 0.27 |
P.S.I.A. Rational | 13 | 0.24 |
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 12 | 0.16 |
Father's educational level | 29 | 0.15 |
P.S.I.A. System factor | 12 | 0.14 |
Observed associative horizon | 10 | 0.14 |
Educational level | 33 | 0.14 |
P.S.I.A. Cold | 13 | 0.10 |
P.S.I.A. Aspergoid | 13 | 0.06 |
P.S.I.A. Ethics factor | 19 | 0.01 |
P.S.I.A. Rare | 13 | 0.01 |
P.S.I.A. Just | 13 | -0.05 |
Mother's educational level | 29 | -0.07 |
Sex | 60 | -0.11 |
Disorders (own) | 35 | -0.12 |
Observed behaviour | 15 | -0.14 |
P.S.I.A. Deviance factor | 19 | -0.20 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 32 | -0.21 |
Year of birth | 52 | -0.23 |
P.S.I.A. Cruel | 13 | -0.24 |
P.S.I.A. Introverted | 13 | -0.27 |
P.S.I.A. Neurotic | 13 | -0.42 |
P.S.I.A. Antisocial | 13 | -0.44 |
In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for both values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.
Raw score | Upward g (n) | Downward g (n) |
---|---|---|
100 | 0.39 (176) | NaN (0) |
128.7 | 0.23 (109) | 0.67 (21) |
137.5 | 0.55 (44) | 0.53 (91) |
136.3 | 0.55 (44) | 0.58 (90) |
160 | NaN (0) | 0.39 (176) |