Statistics of Strict Logic Spatial Examination 48 (Jonathan Wai)

© Paul Cooijmans

Introduction

These statistics are based on scores on this test as reported by candidates taking I.Q. tests from I.Q. Tests for the High Range.

Scores on Strict Logic Spatial Examination 48 (Jonathan Wai) as of 19 August 2026

Contents type: Spatial.   

6.5 *
7 *
8.5 *
9 ***
10.5 ***
11 ***
12 ***
12.5 *
13 *
13.5 *
14 *
14.5 **
15 *
15.5 ***
17 **
17.5 **
18 **
18.5 **
19 *
20 *
20.5 *****
21.5 ****
22 *
23 ***
24.5 *
26 **
28 *
29 **
35.5 *

Correlation of Strict Logic Spatial Examination 48 (Jonathan Wai) with other mental ability tests

Test name n rp value
The Alchemist Test (Anas El Husseini)40.970.09
Test For Genius - Revision 201650.950.06
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 201140.940.10
Dicing with death40.920.11
The Piper's Test40.910.12
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 201650.910.07
Tests by Ivan Ivec (aggregate)80.900.02
The Final Test50.880.08
Test of the Beheaded Man80.880.02
Test of Inductive Reasoning / J.C.T.I. (Xavier Jouve)50.870.08
Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato)170.850.0007
Spatial Insight Test60.840.06
Strict Logic Sequences Examination II (Jonathan Wai)150.820.002
Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve)60.810.07
Epiq Tests (aggregate)130.800.005
Tests by Mislav Predavec (aggregate)60.790.08
Association subtest of Long Test For Genius40.770.18
Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström)190.750.002
Logicaus Strictimanus 24 (Robert Lato)110.750.02
The Nemesis Test80.750.05
Tests by Paul Laurent Miranda (aggregate)50.720.15
The Test To End All Tests40.660.26
Reflections In Peroxide60.630.16
The Sargasso Test70.630.12
Verbal section of The Marathon Test80.610.10
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 290.600.09
Cooijmans Intelligence Test 560.580.19
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3110.560.07
Cooijmans On-Line Test - Two-barrelled version40.550.34
The Marathon Test80.550.14
Sigma Test (Melão Hindemburg)40.550.34
A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude50.550.27
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree80.540.15
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 470.510.22
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 201660.500.26
Strict Logic Sequences Examination I (Jonathan Wai)330.490.006
Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test170.400.11
Space, Time, and Hyperspace - Revision 201660.400.37
Cartoons of Shock40.330.57
Spatial section of The Marathon Test110.320.32
Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010100.300.37
Genius Association Test110.260.40
Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test110.220.48
Test For Genius - Revision 2004100.200.54
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4110.180.57
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5160.180.48
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales50.170.74
Numerical section of The Marathon Test110.170.60
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004110.150.64
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the third degree70.130.76
Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004130.030.92
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008160.020.94
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice7-0.040.92
The Gate4-0.090.87
Numbers4-0.140.81
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 20104-0.170.76
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.)5-0.210.66
Associative LIMIT12-0.210.48
Reason - Revision 200816-0.230.37
Isis Test7-0.240.54
Labyrinthine LIMIT6-0.300.50
916 Test (Laurent Dubois)7-0.320.42
Reason7-0.330.42
Miscellaneous tests14-0.380.16
Daedalus Test6-0.390.38
Tests by Greg Grove (aggregate)4-0.540.36

Weighted mean of correlations: 0.377 (N = 561)

Estimated g factor loading: 0.61

Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.

Estimated loadings of Strict Logic Spatial Examination 48 (Jonathan Wai) on particular item types

These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.

Typeng loading of Strict Logic Spatial Examination 48 (Jonathan Wai) on that type
Verbal750.62
Numerical730.67
Spatial810.71
Logical34-0.34
Heterogeneous1530.74

N = 416

Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.

Balanced g loading = 0.48

National medians for Strict Logic Spatial Examination 48 (Jonathan Wai)

Country n median score
Korea_South323.0
China621.8
Spain320.5
Sweden519.0
Unknown417.8
Finland414.0
United_States612.0

Total number of countries: 27

For reasons of privacy, only countries with 3 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the medians, and then alphabetic.

Correlation of Strict Logic Spatial Examination 48 (Jonathan Wai) with personal details

Notice: A correlation is generally considered significant if its p value is 0.05 or less.

Personalia n rp value
PSIA Introverted - Revision 200790.690.05
PSIA Neurotic - Revision 200790.510.14
PSIA System factor - Revision 200790.470.18
PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 200790.400.26
PSIA Cruel - Revision 200790.390.27
PSIA Orderly - Revision 200790.360.30
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms50.350.48
PSIA Just - Revision 200790.290.40
PSIA Cold - Revision 200790.230.52
Year of birth510.230.11
PSIA Antisocial - Revision 200790.230.52
PSIA True - Revision 200790.220.52
Disorders (own)350.180.28
Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes40.160.78
PSIA Rational - Revision 200790.090.78
Sex550.020.90
PSIA Rare - Revision 200790.020.97
PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 200790.010.97
PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 20079-0.020.97
Disorders (parents and siblings)34-0.090.62
Educational level35-0.130.44
Father's educational level33-0.240.18
PSIA Extreme - Revision 20079-0.240.50
Mother's educational level33-0.290.10
Observed behaviour9-0.640.07

Estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges

The goal of estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for these values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.

Below 1st quartile (12.0)0.42 (N = 108)
Below median (17.5)0.43 (N = 307)
Above median (17.5)0.45 (N = 203)
Above 3rd quartile (21.5)0.30 (N = 125)