These statistics are based on scores on this test as reported by candidates taking I.Q. tests from I.Q. Tests for the High Range.
Contents type: Spatial.
| 6.5 | * |
| 7 | * |
| 8.5 | * |
| 9 | *** |
| 10.5 | *** |
| 11 | *** |
| 12 | *** |
| 12.5 | * |
| 13 | * |
| 13.5 | * |
| 14 | * |
| 14.5 | ** |
| 15 | * |
| 15.5 | *** |
| 17 | ** |
| 17.5 | ** |
| 18 | ** |
| 18.5 | ** |
| 19 | * |
| 20 | * |
| 20.5 | ***** |
| 21.5 | **** |
| 22 | * |
| 23 | *** |
| 24.5 | * |
| 26 | ** |
| 28 | * |
| 29 | ** |
| 35.5 | * |
| Test name | n | r | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Alchemist Test (Anas El Husseini) | 4 | 0.97 | 0.09 |
| Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 5 | 0.95 | 0.06 |
| Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011 | 4 | 0.94 | 0.10 |
| Dicing with death | 4 | 0.92 | 0.11 |
| The Piper's Test | 4 | 0.91 | 0.12 |
| Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 5 | 0.91 | 0.07 |
| Tests by Ivan Ivec (aggregate) | 8 | 0.90 | 0.02 |
| The Final Test | 5 | 0.88 | 0.08 |
| Test of the Beheaded Man | 8 | 0.88 | 0.02 |
| Test of Inductive Reasoning / J.C.T.I. (Xavier Jouve) | 5 | 0.87 | 0.08 |
| Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato) | 17 | 0.85 | 0.0007 |
| Spatial Insight Test | 6 | 0.84 | 0.06 |
| Strict Logic Sequences Examination II (Jonathan Wai) | 15 | 0.82 | 0.002 |
| Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve) | 6 | 0.81 | 0.07 |
| Epiq Tests (aggregate) | 13 | 0.80 | 0.005 |
| Tests by Mislav Predavec (aggregate) | 6 | 0.79 | 0.08 |
| Association subtest of Long Test For Genius | 4 | 0.77 | 0.18 |
| Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström) | 19 | 0.75 | 0.002 |
| Logicaus Strictimanus 24 (Robert Lato) | 11 | 0.75 | 0.02 |
| The Nemesis Test | 8 | 0.75 | 0.05 |
| Tests by Paul Laurent Miranda (aggregate) | 5 | 0.72 | 0.15 |
| The Test To End All Tests | 4 | 0.66 | 0.26 |
| Reflections In Peroxide | 6 | 0.63 | 0.16 |
| The Sargasso Test | 7 | 0.63 | 0.12 |
| Verbal section of The Marathon Test | 8 | 0.61 | 0.10 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 9 | 0.60 | 0.09 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test 5 | 6 | 0.58 | 0.19 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3 | 11 | 0.56 | 0.07 |
| Cooijmans On-Line Test - Two-barrelled version | 4 | 0.55 | 0.34 |
| The Marathon Test | 8 | 0.55 | 0.14 |
| Sigma Test (Melão Hindemburg) | 4 | 0.55 | 0.34 |
| A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude | 5 | 0.55 | 0.27 |
| Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree | 8 | 0.54 | 0.15 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4 | 7 | 0.51 | 0.22 |
| Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 6 | 0.50 | 0.26 |
| Strict Logic Sequences Examination I (Jonathan Wai) | 33 | 0.49 | 0.006 |
| Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 17 | 0.40 | 0.11 |
| Space, Time, and Hyperspace - Revision 2016 | 6 | 0.40 | 0.37 |
| Cartoons of Shock | 4 | 0.33 | 0.57 |
| Spatial section of The Marathon Test | 11 | 0.32 | 0.32 |
| Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 10 | 0.30 | 0.37 |
| Genius Association Test | 11 | 0.26 | 0.40 |
| Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test | 11 | 0.22 | 0.48 |
| Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 10 | 0.20 | 0.54 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 11 | 0.18 | 0.57 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5 | 16 | 0.18 | 0.48 |
| Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales | 5 | 0.17 | 0.74 |
| Numerical section of The Marathon Test | 11 | 0.17 | 0.60 |
| Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 11 | 0.15 | 0.64 |
| Problems In Gentle Slopes of the third degree | 7 | 0.13 | 0.76 |
| Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 13 | 0.03 | 0.92 |
| Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008 | 16 | 0.02 | 0.94 |
| Reason Behind Multiple-Choice | 7 | -0.04 | 0.92 |
| The Gate | 4 | -0.09 | 0.87 |
| Numbers | 4 | -0.14 | 0.81 |
| Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 4 | -0.17 | 0.76 |
| Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.) | 5 | -0.21 | 0.66 |
| Associative LIMIT | 12 | -0.21 | 0.48 |
| Reason - Revision 2008 | 16 | -0.23 | 0.37 |
| Isis Test | 7 | -0.24 | 0.54 |
| Labyrinthine LIMIT | 6 | -0.30 | 0.50 |
| 916 Test (Laurent Dubois) | 7 | -0.32 | 0.42 |
| Reason | 7 | -0.33 | 0.42 |
| Miscellaneous tests | 14 | -0.38 | 0.16 |
| Daedalus Test | 6 | -0.39 | 0.38 |
| Tests by Greg Grove (aggregate) | 4 | -0.54 | 0.36 |
Weighted mean of correlations: 0.377 (N = 561)
Estimated g factor loading: 0.61
Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.
These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.
| Type | n | g loading of Strict Logic Spatial Examination 48 (Jonathan Wai) on that type |
|---|---|---|
| Verbal | 75 | 0.62 |
| Numerical | 73 | 0.67 |
| Spatial | 81 | 0.71 |
| Logical | 34 | -0.34 |
| Heterogeneous | 153 | 0.74 |
N = 416
Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.
Balanced g loading = 0.48
| Country | n | median score |
|---|---|---|
| Korea_South | 3 | 23.0 |
| China | 6 | 21.8 |
| Spain | 3 | 20.5 |
| Sweden | 5 | 19.0 |
| Unknown | 4 | 17.8 |
| Finland | 4 | 14.0 |
| United_States | 6 | 12.0 |
Total number of countries: 27
For reasons of privacy, only countries with 3 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the medians, and then alphabetic.
Notice: A correlation is generally considered significant if its p value is 0.05 or less.
| Personalia | n | r | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| PSIA Introverted - Revision 2007 | 9 | 0.69 | 0.05 |
| PSIA Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 9 | 0.51 | 0.14 |
| PSIA System factor - Revision 2007 | 9 | 0.47 | 0.18 |
| PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 9 | 0.40 | 0.26 |
| PSIA Cruel - Revision 2007 | 9 | 0.39 | 0.27 |
| PSIA Orderly - Revision 2007 | 9 | 0.36 | 0.30 |
| Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 5 | 0.35 | 0.48 |
| PSIA Just - Revision 2007 | 9 | 0.29 | 0.40 |
| PSIA Cold - Revision 2007 | 9 | 0.23 | 0.52 |
| Year of birth | 51 | 0.23 | 0.11 |
| PSIA Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 9 | 0.23 | 0.52 |
| PSIA True - Revision 2007 | 9 | 0.22 | 0.52 |
| Disorders (own) | 35 | 0.18 | 0.28 |
| Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes | 4 | 0.16 | 0.78 |
| PSIA Rational - Revision 2007 | 9 | 0.09 | 0.78 |
| Sex | 55 | 0.02 | 0.90 |
| PSIA Rare - Revision 2007 | 9 | 0.02 | 0.97 |
| PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 9 | 0.01 | 0.97 |
| PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 9 | -0.02 | 0.97 |
| Disorders (parents and siblings) | 34 | -0.09 | 0.62 |
| Educational level | 35 | -0.13 | 0.44 |
| Father's educational level | 33 | -0.24 | 0.18 |
| PSIA Extreme - Revision 2007 | 9 | -0.24 | 0.50 |
| Mother's educational level | 33 | -0.29 | 0.10 |
| Observed behaviour | 9 | -0.64 | 0.07 |
The goal of estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for these values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.
| Below 1st quartile (12.0) | 0.42 (N = 108) |
|---|---|
| Below median (17.5) | 0.43 (N = 307) |
| Above median (17.5) | 0.45 (N = 203) |
| Above 3rd quartile (21.5) | 0.30 (N = 125) |