These statistics are based on scores on this test as reported by candidates taking I.Q. tests from I.Q. Tests for the High Range.
Contents type: Numerical.
| 4 | * |
| 5 | * |
| 7 | ** |
| 8 | **** |
| 9 | **** |
| 10 | *** |
| 11 | *** |
| 13 | **** |
| 14 | ** |
| 15 | * |
| 16 | * |
| 17 | * |
| 21 | ** |
| 23 | * |
| 25 | * |
| Test name | n | r | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sigma Test (Melão Hindemburg) | 4 | 0.98 | 0.09 |
| The Alchemist Test (Anas El Husseini) | 5 | 0.98 | 0.05 |
| Psychometric Qrosswords | 4 | 0.98 | 0.09 |
| Tests by Paul Laurent Miranda (aggregate) | 4 | 0.97 | 0.10 |
| Tests by Ivan Ivec (aggregate) | 11 | 0.96 | 0.002 |
| The Nemesis Test | 7 | 0.94 | 0.02 |
| The Piper's Test | 4 | 0.93 | 0.11 |
| Tests by Mislav Predavec (aggregate) | 6 | 0.92 | 0.04 |
| Test of the Beheaded Man | 6 | 0.91 | 0.04 |
| Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales | 4 | 0.91 | 0.12 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4 | 7 | 0.90 | 0.03 |
| Logicaus Strictimanus 24 (Robert Lato) | 8 | 0.88 | 0.02 |
| Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato) | 14 | 0.86 | 0.002 |
| Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test | 6 | 0.85 | 0.06 |
| Narcissus' last stand | 4 | 0.85 | 0.14 |
| Reason Behind Multiple-Choice | 4 | 0.85 | 0.14 |
| Spatial section of The Marathon Test | 6 | 0.84 | 0.06 |
| The Sargasso Test | 7 | 0.84 | 0.04 |
| Strict Logic Spatial Examination 48 (Jonathan Wai) | 15 | 0.82 | 0.002 |
| Sequentia Numerica Form I (Alexander Herkner) | 4 | 0.82 | 0.15 |
| Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 4 | 0.82 | 0.16 |
| Reason | 4 | 0.81 | 0.16 |
| Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree | 9 | 0.81 | 0.02 |
| A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude | 7 | 0.80 | 0.05 |
| Tests by Xavier Jouve, other than those listed separately (aggregate) | 4 | 0.78 | 0.17 |
| Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 4 | 0.78 | 0.18 |
| Numerical section of The Marathon Test | 6 | 0.76 | 0.09 |
| Problems In Gentle Slopes of the third degree | 5 | 0.74 | 0.13 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test 5 | 7 | 0.74 | 0.07 |
| 916 Test (Laurent Dubois) | 4 | 0.74 | 0.20 |
| Epiq Tests (aggregate) | 9 | 0.70 | 0.05 |
| Miscellaneous tests | 14 | 0.67 | 0.02 |
| Test of Inductive Reasoning / J.C.T.I. (Xavier Jouve) | 4 | 0.65 | 0.26 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3 | 10 | 0.62 | 0.06 |
| Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011 | 5 | 0.62 | 0.22 |
| Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.) | 7 | 0.58 | 0.16 |
| A Relaxing Test (David Miller) | 4 | 0.51 | 0.37 |
| Tests by Jason Betts (aggregate) | 5 | 0.42 | 0.40 |
| Strict Logic Sequences Examination I (Jonathan Wai) | 27 | 0.41 | 0.04 |
| Analogies of Long Test For Genius | 5 | 0.40 | 0.42 |
| Tests by Theodosis Prousalis (aggregate) | 4 | 0.39 | 0.50 |
| Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström) | 9 | 0.39 | 0.27 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5 | 10 | 0.34 | 0.32 |
| Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008 | 10 | 0.28 | 0.40 |
| Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 8 | 0.26 | 0.48 |
| Odds | 5 | 0.26 | 0.60 |
| Numbers | 7 | 0.25 | 0.52 |
| Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve) | 7 | 0.24 | 0.57 |
| The Test To End All Tests | 5 | 0.23 | 0.64 |
| The Bonsai Test - Revision 2016 | 5 | 0.21 | 0.66 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Paul Cooijmans) | 5 | 0.19 | 0.71 |
| Tests by Greg Grove (aggregate) | 4 | 0.18 | 0.76 |
| Cooijmans On-Line Test - Two-barrelled version | 5 | 0.17 | 0.74 |
| The Final Test | 6 | 0.12 | 0.78 |
| Associative LIMIT | 7 | 0.10 | 0.81 |
| Reason - Revision 2008 | 10 | 0.07 | 0.81 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 6 | 0.07 | 0.87 |
| Genius Association Test | 10 | 0.01 | 0.97 |
| Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 7 | -0.02 | 0.94 |
| Space, Time, and Hyperspace - Revision 2016 | 6 | -0.05 | 0.92 |
| Reflections In Peroxide | 6 | -0.07 | 0.87 |
| Daedalus Test | 5 | -0.08 | 0.87 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 6 | -0.08 | 0.84 |
| Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 9 | -0.08 | 0.81 |
| Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 8 | -0.09 | 0.81 |
| Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | 6 | -0.10 | 0.81 |
| Association subtest of Long Test For Genius | 5 | -0.12 | 0.81 |
| Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 5 | -0.23 | 0.64 |
| Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 10 | -0.24 | 0.48 |
| Test of Shock and Awe | 4 | -0.28 | 0.64 |
| Space, Time, and Hyperspace | 4 | -0.46 | 0.42 |
| Long Test For Genius | 4 | -0.61 | 0.28 |
| Verbal section of The Marathon Test | 4 | -0.66 | 0.26 |
| Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 4 | -0.78 | 0.17 |
| The Marathon Test | 4 | -0.80 | 0.16 |
Weighted mean of correlations: 0.425 (N = 494)
Estimated g factor loading: 0.65
Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.
These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.
| Type | n | g loading of Strict Logic Sequences Examination II (Jonathan Wai) on that type |
|---|---|---|
| Verbal | 72 | 0.44 |
| Numerical | 59 | 0.58 |
| Spatial | 70 | 0.68 |
| Logical | 23 | 0.52 |
| Heterogeneous | 133 | 0.77 |
N = 357
Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.
Balanced g loading = 0.60
| Country | n | median score |
|---|---|---|
| China | 3 | 23.0 |
| Germany | 3 | 13.0 |
| Turkey | 3 | 10.0 |
| United_States | 5 | 9.0 |
Total number of countries: 17
For reasons of privacy, only countries with 3 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the medians, and then alphabetic.
Notice: A correlation is generally considered significant if its p value is 0.05 or less.
| Personalia | n | r | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 7 | 0.79 | 0.05 |
| PSIA Introverted - Revision 2007 | 7 | 0.66 | 0.10 |
| PSIA Rational - Revision 2007 | 7 | 0.60 | 0.14 |
| PSIA Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 7 | 0.50 | 0.24 |
| PSIA Cold - Revision 2007 | 7 | 0.47 | 0.25 |
| PSIA System factor - Revision 2007 | 7 | 0.44 | 0.28 |
| Year of birth | 30 | 0.42 | 0.02 |
| PSIA Rare - Revision 2007 | 7 | 0.37 | 0.37 |
| PSIA Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 7 | 0.37 | 0.37 |
| PSIA Just - Revision 2007 | 7 | 0.36 | 0.38 |
| PSIA True - Revision 2007 | 7 | 0.34 | 0.40 |
| PSIA Cruel - Revision 2007 | 7 | 0.33 | 0.42 |
| PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 7 | 0.19 | 0.64 |
| PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 7 | 0.19 | 0.64 |
| Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 5 | 0.16 | 0.74 |
| Disorders (own) | 25 | 0.13 | 0.52 |
| PSIA Orderly - Revision 2007 | 7 | -0.08 | 0.84 |
| Mother's educational level | 22 | -0.12 | 0.60 |
| PSIA Extreme - Revision 2007 | 7 | -0.18 | 0.66 |
| Educational level | 23 | -0.18 | 0.40 |
| Disorders (parents and siblings) | 23 | -0.21 | 0.32 |
| Father's educational level | 22 | -0.46 | 0.03 |
| Observed behaviour | 6 | -0.56 | 0.22 |
The goal of estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for these values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.
| Below 1st quartile (8.0) | 0.31 (N = 69) |
|---|---|
| Below median (11.0) | 0.13 (N = 268) |
| Above median (11.0) | 0.57 (N = 187) |
| Above 3rd quartile (14.0) | 0.68 (N = 55) |