Statistics of Strict Logic Sequences Examination II

© Paul Cooijmans

Introduction

These statistics are based on scores on this test as reported by candidates taking I.Q. tests from I.Q. Tests for the High Range.

Scores on Strict Logic Sequences Examination II (Jonathan Wai) as of 19 August 2026

Contents type: Numerical.   

4 *
5 *
7 **
8 ****
9 ****
10 ***
11 ***
13 ****
14 **
15 *
16 *
17 *
21 **
23 *
25 *

Correlation of Strict Logic Sequences Examination II (Jonathan Wai) with other mental ability tests

Test name n rp value
Sigma Test (Melão Hindemburg)40.980.09
The Alchemist Test (Anas El Husseini)50.980.05
Psychometric Qrosswords40.980.09
Tests by Paul Laurent Miranda (aggregate)40.970.10
Tests by Ivan Ivec (aggregate)110.960.002
The Nemesis Test70.940.02
The Piper's Test40.930.11
Tests by Mislav Predavec (aggregate)60.920.04
Test of the Beheaded Man60.910.04
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales40.910.12
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 470.900.03
Logicaus Strictimanus 24 (Robert Lato)80.880.02
Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato)140.860.002
Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test60.850.06
Narcissus' last stand40.850.14
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice40.850.14
Spatial section of The Marathon Test60.840.06
The Sargasso Test70.840.04
Strict Logic Spatial Examination 48 (Jonathan Wai)150.820.002
Sequentia Numerica Form I (Alexander Herkner)40.820.15
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 201640.820.16
Reason40.810.16
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree90.810.02
A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude70.800.05
Tests by Xavier Jouve, other than those listed separately (aggregate)40.780.17
Test For Genius - Revision 201640.780.18
Numerical section of The Marathon Test60.760.09
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the third degree50.740.13
Cooijmans Intelligence Test 570.740.07
916 Test (Laurent Dubois)40.740.20
Epiq Tests (aggregate)90.700.05
Miscellaneous tests140.670.02
Test of Inductive Reasoning / J.C.T.I. (Xavier Jouve)40.650.26
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3100.620.06
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 201150.620.22
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.)70.580.16
A Relaxing Test (David Miller)40.510.37
Tests by Jason Betts (aggregate)50.420.40
Strict Logic Sequences Examination I (Jonathan Wai)270.410.04
Analogies of Long Test For Genius50.400.42
Tests by Theodosis Prousalis (aggregate)40.390.50
Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström)90.390.27
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5100.340.32
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008100.280.40
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 200480.260.48
Odds50.260.60
Numbers70.250.52
Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve)70.240.57
The Test To End All Tests50.230.64
The Bonsai Test - Revision 201650.210.66
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Paul Cooijmans)50.190.71
Tests by Greg Grove (aggregate)40.180.76
Cooijmans On-Line Test - Two-barrelled version50.170.74
The Final Test60.120.78
Associative LIMIT70.100.81
Reason - Revision 2008100.070.81
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 260.070.87
Genius Association Test100.010.97
Test For Genius - Revision 20047-0.020.94
Space, Time, and Hyperspace - Revision 20166-0.050.92
Reflections In Peroxide6-0.070.87
Daedalus Test5-0.080.87
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #46-0.080.84
Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 20049-0.080.81
Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test8-0.090.81
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 20166-0.100.81
Association subtest of Long Test For Genius5-0.120.81
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 20105-0.230.64
Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 201010-0.240.48
Test of Shock and Awe4-0.280.64
Space, Time, and Hyperspace4-0.460.42
Long Test For Genius4-0.610.28
Verbal section of The Marathon Test4-0.660.26
Test For Genius - Revision 20104-0.780.17
The Marathon Test4-0.800.16

Weighted mean of correlations: 0.425 (N = 494)

Estimated g factor loading: 0.65

Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.

Estimated loadings of Strict Logic Sequences Examination II (Jonathan Wai) on particular item types

These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.

Typeng loading of Strict Logic Sequences Examination II (Jonathan Wai) on that type
Verbal720.44
Numerical590.58
Spatial700.68
Logical230.52
Heterogeneous1330.77

N = 357

Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.

Balanced g loading = 0.60

National medians for Strict Logic Sequences Examination II (Jonathan Wai)

Country n median score
China323.0
Germany313.0
Turkey310.0
United_States59.0

Total number of countries: 17

For reasons of privacy, only countries with 3 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the medians, and then alphabetic.

Correlation of Strict Logic Sequences Examination II (Jonathan Wai) with personal details

Notice: A correlation is generally considered significant if its p value is 0.05 or less.

Personalia n rp value
PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 200770.790.05
PSIA Introverted - Revision 200770.660.10
PSIA Rational - Revision 200770.600.14
PSIA Neurotic - Revision 200770.500.24
PSIA Cold - Revision 200770.470.25
PSIA System factor - Revision 200770.440.28
Year of birth300.420.02
PSIA Rare - Revision 200770.370.37
PSIA Antisocial - Revision 200770.370.37
PSIA Just - Revision 200770.360.38
PSIA True - Revision 200770.340.40
PSIA Cruel - Revision 200770.330.42
PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 200770.190.64
PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 200770.190.64
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms50.160.74
Disorders (own)250.130.52
PSIA Orderly - Revision 20077-0.080.84
Mother's educational level22-0.120.60
PSIA Extreme - Revision 20077-0.180.66
Educational level23-0.180.40
Disorders (parents and siblings)23-0.210.32
Father's educational level22-0.460.03
Observed behaviour6-0.560.22

Estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges

The goal of estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for these values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.

Below 1st quartile (8.0)0.31 (N = 69)
Below median (11.0)0.13 (N = 268)
Above median (11.0)0.57 (N = 187)
Above 3rd quartile (14.0)0.68 (N = 55)