Statistics of Strict Logic Sequences Examination - Form I

© Paul Cooijmans

Introduction

These statistics are based on scores on this test as reported by candidates taking I.Q. tests from I.Q. Tests for the High Range.

Scores on Strict Logic Sequences Examination I (Jonathan Wai) as of 6 January 2026

Contents type: Numerical.   

7 *
11 ***
13 **
14 **
16 ***
17 ****
18 ***
19 **
20 **
21 *****
22 ****
23 ***
24 ********
25 *****
26 ******
27 ********
28 *********
29 ********
30 **************
31 ******
32 ******
33 ******
34 *******
35 ****
37 *
38 *

Correlation of Strict Logic Sequences Examination I (Jonathan Wai) with other mental ability tests

Test name n rp value
Hoeflin Power Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin)41.000.08
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the first degree60.970.03
Psychometric Qrosswords60.920.04
Tests by Ivan Ivec (aggregate)130.870.002
Low Countries Aptitude Test40.860.13
Tests by Mislav Predavec (aggregate)80.860.02
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales100.850.01
Sigma Test (Melão Hindemburg)60.840.06
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #240.840.14
Tests by James Dorsey (aggregate)50.830.10
Titan Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin)50.830.10
Numerical Insight Test70.820.05
The Alchemist Test (Anas El Husseini)90.780.03
Tests by Paul Laurent Miranda (aggregate)100.750.03
Test of the Beheaded Man130.730.01
Test For Genius - Revision 2016100.720.03
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2016100.720.03
Cartoons of Shock100.710.03
Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve)260.700.0005
Tests by Arne Andre Gangvik (aggregate)40.690.24
Association subtest of Long Test For Genius90.690.05
Tests by Xavier Jouve, other than those listed separately (aggregate)130.690.02
Associative LIMIT180.680.005
Bonsai Test60.680.12
Test For Genius - Revision 2004200.670.004
Logima Strictica 24 (Robert Lato)140.660.02
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3220.660.003
Cooijmans Intelligence Test 5100.640.05
916 Test (Laurent Dubois)150.640.02
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (raw)100.630.06
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Paul Cooijmans)130.620.03
Odds80.620.10
Genius Association Test230.620.004
The Marathon Test120.620.04
Miscellaneous tests370.600.0003
Analogies of Long Test For Genius100.600.07
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version)50.600.24
Tests by Nikolaos Soulios (aggregate)50.570.26
Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004270.570.004
Dicing with death40.570.34
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004250.560.006
Test of Shock and Awe70.550.17
The Final Test160.550.03
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree120.550.07
Long Test For Genius80.540.16
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2010100.520.12
Tests by Theodosis Prousalis (aggregate)70.510.22
Reflections In Peroxide90.500.15
Verbal section of The Marathon Test130.490.09
Spatial Insight Test90.490.16
International High IQ Society tests (aggregate)80.490.19
Strict Logic Spatial Exam 48 (Jonathan Wai)320.490.007
Numerical section of The Marathon Test130.480.10
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.)120.480.11
Test of Inductive Reasoning / J.C.T.I. (Xavier Jouve)120.480.11
Epiq Tests (aggregate)280.480.01
Narcissus' last stand70.470.25
Space, Time, and Hyperspace190.460.05
Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test250.450.03
Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test130.440.12
Random Feickery (Brandon Feick)50.430.38
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011120.420.16
Words60.420.36
The Blue Test (Andres Gomez Emilsson)40.410.48
Strict Logic Sequences Exam II (Jonathan Wai)260.410.04
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2170.390.12
The Test To End All Tests110.390.22
Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010200.360.12
Tests by Jason Betts (aggregate)90.350.34
Tests by Greg Grove (aggregate)120.310.30
A Relaxing Test (David Miller)60.300.50
Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström)350.300.08
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4110.290.37
The Sargasso Test150.290.28
Spatial section of The Marathon Test130.250.38
Sequentia Numerica Form I (Alexander Herkner)90.240.48
Test For Genius - Revision 201070.240.57
Tests by Nicolas Elenas (aggregate)50.170.74
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2016120.170.57
The LAW - Letters And Words40.160.78
The Piper's Test40.130.81
Numbers140.130.64
Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato)300.110.54
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the third degree90.100.76
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5240.080.71
Isis Test130.070.81
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice70.070.87
Space, Time, and Hyperspace - Revision 2016120.070.81
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008240.030.90
The Smell Test40.020.97
Reason - Revision 200824-0.020.92
The Bonsai Test - Revision 201610-0.030.94
The Final Test - Revision 20136-0.050.90
Only idiots4-0.100.87
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #418-0.120.62
Reason9-0.150.66
The Nemesis Test9-0.160.64
Labyrinthine LIMIT7-0.180.66
Letters5-0.190.71
Concep-T (Laurent Dubois)5-0.240.64
Daedalus Test9-0.470.18
Cooijmans On-Line Test - Two-barrelled version7-0.570.16
The Hammer Of Test-Hungry - Revision 20136-0.610.17
Cattell Culture Fair5-0.630.20
A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude8-0.770.04
Psychometrically Activated Grids Acerbate Neuroticism4-0.910.12

Weighted mean of correlations: 0.405 (N = 1252)

Estimated g factor loading: 0.64

Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.

Estimated loadings of Strict Logic Sequences Examination I (Jonathan Wai) on particular item types

These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.

Typeng loading of Strict Logic Sequences Exam I (Jonathan Wai) on that type
Verbal2030.65
Numerical970.63
Spatial1810.63
Logical54-0.08
Heterogeneous3490.65

N = 884

Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.

Balanced g loading = 0.50

National medians for Strict Logic Sequences Examination I (Jonathan Wai)

Country n median score
Switzerland332.0
China631.5
Japan431.5
Finland330.0
Netherlands530.0
Sweden1028.5
Croatia328.0
Poland328.0
Germany1227.5
India327.0
Korea_South527.0
Unknown1426.5
United_Kingdom426.5
France325.0
Greece325.0
United_States1223.0
Italy421.5
Turkey421.0

Total number of countries: 36

For reasons of privacy, only countries with 3 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the medians, and then alphabetic.

Correlation of Strict Logic Sequences Examination I (Jonathan Wai) with personal details

Personalia n rp value
PSIA Orderly - Revision 2007140.420.13
Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes70.340.40
PSIA Antisocial - Revision 2007140.330.24
PSIA Extreme - Revision 2007140.320.26
PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 2007140.300.28
PSIA Rare - Revision 2007140.280.32
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms170.250.32
PSIA System factor - Revision 2007140.210.44
PSIA Introverted - Revision 2007140.180.52
Year of birth1130.120.22
PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 2007140.100.71
PSIA Cold - Revision 2007140.040.90
Educational level770.030.78
PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 2007140.010.97
PSIA Just - Revision 200714-0.001.00
Mother's educational level75-0.010.92
Sex122-0.020.87
Disorders (own)78-0.030.78
PSIA True - Revision 200714-0.040.90
Father's educational level75-0.060.62
Disorders (parents and siblings)76-0.060.60
PSIA Rational - Revision 200714-0.100.71
PSIA Cruel - Revision 200714-0.130.64
Observed behaviour20-0.150.50
PSIA Neurotic - Revision 200714-0.160.54

Notice: A correlation is generally considered significant if its p value is 0.05 or less.

Estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges

The goal of estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for these values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.

Below 1st quartile (22.0)0.54 (N = 365)
Below median (28.0)0.54 (N = 873)
Above median (28.0)0.47 (N = 415)
Above 3rd quartile (31.0)0.49 (N = 112)