Statistics of Nonverbal Cognitive Performance Examination

© Paul Cooijmans

Scores on Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve) as of 27 September 2024

Contents type: Numerical, spatial, logical.   

110 *
117 *
124 *
126 **
128 *
130 *
133 *
134 **
135 ****
137 ****
139 *****
141 *
142 *
143 ******
146 ********
147 *
148 *
149 ******
150 **
151 *
152 *
153 *******
158 ***
160 *
171 *
174 *

Correlation of Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve) with other mental ability tests

Test name n r
Narcissus' last stand40.94
Spatial Insight Test60.94
Numerical section of The Marathon Test40.93
Test of the Beheaded Man50.93
Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test40.89
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 360.88
European I.Q. Test50.87
Reflections In Peroxide40.86
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Paul Cooijmans)170.85
Associative LIMIT70.85
The Test To End All Tests90.83
Test of Shock and Awe60.83
Test For Genius - Revision 2004140.82
Spatial section of The Marathon Test40.82
The Sargasso Test50.82
Strict Logic Spatial Exam 48 (Jonathan Wai)60.81
Titan Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin)40.73
Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test130.73
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004140.72
Genius Association Test120.72
Strict Logic Sequences Exam I (Jonathan Wai)260.70
Epiq Tests (aggregate)160.70
Association subtest of Long Test For Genius (French)40.70
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #580.69
The Final Test130.68
Cartoons of Shock50.68
Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004160.68
Long Test For Genius150.68
Numerical Insight Test50.67
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 290.67
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 200880.63
Association and Analogies (French)40.59
Analogies of Long Test For Genius170.57
Reason - Revision 200880.55
Space, Time, and Hyperspace300.53
Long Test For Genius (French)40.53
Numbers110.53
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #260.52
Psychometric Qrosswords50.52
Test of Inductive Reasoning / J.C.T.I. (Xavier Jouve)120.51
Tests by Greg Grove (aggregate)140.47
Analogies subtest of Long Test For Genius (French)40.45
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4200.45
Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström)140.42
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales50.39
International High IQ Society tests (aggregate)160.38
Cattell Culture Fair90.35
Association subtest of Long Test For Genius190.34
Reason50.32
Miscellaneous tests240.32
Analogies #140.29
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (raw)80.27
Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato)180.25
Encephalist - R (Xavier Jouve)70.24
Strict Logic Sequences Exam II (Jonathan Wai)70.24
Queendom tests50.21
Evens70.20
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Jonathan Wai)50.18
Sigma Test (Melão Hindemburg)110.11
Sequence Cave (Nuno Freitas)60.11
W-87 (International Society for Philosophical Enquiry)40.08
Tests by Xavier Jouve, other than those listed separately (aggregate)90.03
Logima Strictica 24 (Robert Lato)50.02
Isis Test60.01
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #15-0.06
Words5-0.28
Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 20105-0.31
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.)8-0.35
Qoymans Automatic Test #24-0.43
Tests by Nicolas Elenas (aggregate)4-0.47
Odds6-0.51
Mega Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin)4-0.53
Bonsai Test5-0.54
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 14-0.75
Tests by Ivan Ivec (aggregate)4-0.78
Tests by Mislav Predavec (aggregate)4-0.88
Qoymans Automatic Test #14-0.98

Weighted average of correlations: 0.445 (N = 665)

Estimated g factor loading: 0.67

Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.

Estimated loadings of Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve) on particular item types

These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.

Typeng loading of Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve) on that type
Verbal1710.74
Numerical640.66
Spatial800.79
Logical250.70
Heterogeneous820.52

N = 422

Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.

Balanced g loading = 0.68

National medians for Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve)

Country n median score
Belgium3153.0
Greece3146.0
Sweden6143.0
Germany10140.0
United_States8139.0
France3137.0

For reasons of privacy, only countries with 3 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the medians, and then alphabetic.

Correlation with national I.Q.'s of Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve)

Correlation of this test with national average I.Q.'s published by Lynn and Vanhanen, later Lynn and Becker:

Correlation of Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve) with personal details

Personalia n r
Educational level400.21
Father's educational level39-0.03
Sex64-0.04
Observed behaviour13-0.11
Disorders (own)41-0.13
Observed associative horizon6-0.19
Mother's educational level39-0.22
Year of birth58-0.26
Disorders (parents and siblings)40-0.32
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms14-0.46

Estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges

In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for these values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.

Below 1st quartile0.80 (154)
Below median0.70 (378)
Above median0.09 (325)
Above 3rd quartile0.43 (95)