These statistics are based on scores on these tests (there are several of them combined in this report) as reported by candidates taking I.Q. tests from I.Q. Tests for the High Range.
| 100 | * |
| 121 | * |
| 122 | * |
| 123 | * |
| 124 | *** |
| 126 | ** |
| 127 | ** |
| 130 | *** |
| 131 | ** |
| 132 | * |
| 133 | *** |
| 134 | ***** |
| 135 | ** |
| 136 | *** |
| 137 | * |
| 138 | *** |
| 139 | * |
| 140 | **** |
| 141 | ***** |
| 142 | ***** |
| 143 | * |
| 144 | * |
| 145 | * |
| 146 | ***** |
| 147 | * |
| 148 | ** |
| 150 | **** |
| 151 | * |
| 152 | *** |
| 153 | ***** |
| 154 | ** |
| 156 | * |
| 158 | **** |
| 161 | * |
| 163 | * |
| 164 | * |
| 166 | * |
| 170 | * |
| 175 | * |
| 179 | * |
n = 78
| 100 | * |
| 121 | * |
| 122 | * |
| 123 | * |
| 124 | ** |
| 126 | ** |
| 127 | ** |
| 130 | *** |
| 131 | * |
| 133 | *** |
| 134 | ***** |
| 135 | ** |
| 136 | ** |
| 137 | * |
| 138 | ** |
| 139 | * |
| 140 | **** |
| 141 | ***** |
| 142 | ***** |
| 144 | * |
| 146 | **** |
| 147 | * |
| 148 | * |
| 150 | **** |
| 151 | * |
| 152 | *** |
| 153 | ***** |
| 154 | ** |
| 156 | * |
| 158 | **** |
| 161 | * |
| 163 | * |
| 164 | * |
| 166 | * |
| 170 | * |
| 175 | * |
| 179 | * |
n = 7
| 124 | * |
| 131 | * |
| 136 | * |
| 143 | * |
| 145 | * |
| 146 | * |
| 148 | * |
| Test name | n | r | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test 5 | 4 | 0.99 | 0.09 |
| Numerical section of The Marathon Test | 4 | 0.98 | 0.09 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5 | 5 | 0.96 | 0.05 |
| The Nemesis Test | 4 | 0.95 | 0.10 |
| Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008 | 5 | 0.94 | 0.06 |
| Tests by Nikolaos Soulios (aggregate) | 4 | 0.93 | 0.11 |
| Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test | 4 | 0.92 | 0.11 |
| Tests by Jason Betts (aggregate) | 4 | 0.89 | 0.12 |
| 916 Test (Laurent Dubois) | 6 | 0.89 | 0.05 |
| Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011 | 6 | 0.89 | 0.05 |
| A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude | 5 | 0.86 | 0.08 |
| Reason - Revision 2008 | 5 | 0.84 | 0.10 |
| Cattell Culture Fair | 5 | 0.84 | 0.10 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3 | 7 | 0.81 | 0.05 |
| Epiq Tests (aggregate) | 9 | 0.79 | 0.03 |
| Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010 | 4 | 0.79 | 0.17 |
| Test of the Beheaded Man | 5 | 0.78 | 0.12 |
| Spatial section of The Marathon Test | 4 | 0.78 | 0.18 |
| The Sargasso Test | 5 | 0.76 | 0.12 |
| Isis Test | 6 | 0.74 | 0.10 |
| Chimera High Ability Riddle Test (Bill Bultas) | 4 | 0.73 | 0.20 |
| Associative LIMIT | 7 | 0.72 | 0.08 |
| Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales | 10 | 0.70 | 0.04 |
| Titan Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 4 | 0.70 | 0.24 |
| Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 12 | 0.67 | 0.03 |
| Queendom tests | 11 | 0.66 | 0.04 |
| W-87 (International Society for Philosophical Enquiry) | 4 | 0.65 | 0.26 |
| Sequence Cave (Nuno Freitas) | 4 | 0.65 | 0.26 |
| Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström) | 12 | 0.63 | 0.04 |
| The Test To End All Tests | 12 | 0.62 | 0.04 |
| Reason Behind Multiple-Choice | 5 | 0.62 | 0.22 |
| Evens | 5 | 0.60 | 0.24 |
| Sigma Test (Melão Hindemburg) | 5 | 0.59 | 0.25 |
| Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 11 | 0.56 | 0.08 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 7 | 0.54 | 0.18 |
| European I.Q. Test | 9 | 0.53 | 0.13 |
| Genius Association Test | 18 | 0.53 | 0.03 |
| Tests by Greg Grove (aggregate) | 19 | 0.51 | 0.03 |
| Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 12 | 0.49 | 0.10 |
| Strict Logic Sequences Examination I (Jonathan Wai) | 8 | 0.49 | 0.19 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #1 | 15 | 0.48 | 0.07 |
| Reason | 6 | 0.47 | 0.28 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Jonathan Wai) | 12 | 0.46 | 0.13 |
| Tests by Nicolas Elenas (aggregate) | 9 | 0.45 | 0.20 |
| Miscellaneous tests | 47 | 0.42 | 0.005 |
| Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve) | 16 | 0.38 | 0.14 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 18 | 0.38 | 0.12 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Paul Cooijmans) | 23 | 0.37 | 0.08 |
| Words | 5 | 0.34 | 0.50 |
| Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 11 | 0.34 | 0.28 |
| The Final Test | 20 | 0.32 | 0.17 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 1 | 7 | 0.31 | 0.44 |
| Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato) | 9 | 0.27 | 0.44 |
| Analogies #1 | 7 | 0.24 | 0.54 |
| Qoymans Automatic Test #1 | 6 | 0.22 | 0.62 |
| Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.) | 7 | 0.22 | 0.60 |
| Advanced Intelligence Test (Randy Myers) | 6 | 0.21 | 0.64 |
| Analogies of Long Test For Genius | 16 | 0.10 | 0.68 |
| Qoymans Automatic Test #2 | 7 | 0.08 | 0.84 |
| Emode I.Q. tests | 4 | -0.01 | 1.00 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #2 | 13 | -0.01 | 0.97 |
| Association subtest of Long Test For Genius | 18 | -0.10 | 0.66 |
| Numbers | 4 | -0.18 | 0.76 |
| Test of Inductive Reasoning / J.C.T.I. (Xavier Jouve) | 8 | -0.21 | 0.57 |
| Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version) | 4 | -0.22 | 0.71 |
| Space, Time, and Hyperspace | 19 | -0.25 | 0.28 |
| Long Test For Genius | 10 | -0.28 | 0.40 |
| Logicaus Strictimanus 24 (Robert Lato) | 4 | -0.36 | 0.54 |
| Tests by Xavier Jouve, other than those listed separately (aggregate) | 5 | -0.39 | 0.44 |
| Psychometric Qrosswords | 5 | -0.54 | 0.28 |
| G-test (Nikos Lygeros) | 4 | -0.58 | 0.32 |
| Cooijmans On-Line Test | 6 | -0.61 | 0.17 |
Weighted mean of correlations: 0.401 (N = 631)
Estimated g factor loading: 0.63
Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.
These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.
| Type | n | g loading of International High IQ Society tests (aggregate) on that type |
|---|---|---|
| Verbal | 202 | 0.57 |
| Numerical | 29 | 0.74 |
| Spatial | 66 | 0.47 |
| Logical | 25 | 0.26 |
| Heterogeneous | 120 | 0.73 |
N = 442
Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.
Balanced g loading = 0.55
| Country | n | median score |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 158.0 |
| Sweden | 4 | 151.5 |
| United_States | 26 | 145.5 |
| Netherlands | 6 | 145.0 |
| United_Kingdom | 3 | 141.0 |
| Unknown | 19 | 135.0 |
| Finland | 3 | 126.0 |
Total number of countries: 24
For reasons of privacy, only countries with 3 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the medians, and then alphabetic.
Notice: A correlation is generally considered significant if its p value is 0.05 or less.
| Personalia | n | r | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| PSIA Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 5 | 0.57 | 0.26 |
| Observed associative horizon | 10 | 0.50 | 0.13 |
| PSIA Extreme - Revision 2007 | 5 | 0.48 | 0.34 |
| PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 5 | 0.40 | 0.42 |
| PSIA Rare - Revision 2007 | 5 | 0.40 | 0.42 |
| Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes | 6 | 0.34 | 0.44 |
| PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 5 | 0.28 | 0.57 |
| PSIA Orderly - Revision 2007 | 5 | 0.24 | 0.62 |
| PSIA Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 5 | 0.17 | 0.74 |
| Mother's educational level | 54 | 0.16 | 0.25 |
| PSIA Just - Revision 2007 | 5 | 0.12 | 0.81 |
| Disorders (parents and siblings) | 56 | 0.10 | 0.46 |
| Sex | 85 | 0.08 | 0.44 |
| Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 17 | 0.08 | 0.76 |
| Father's educational level | 52 | 0.07 | 0.62 |
| Year of birth | 80 | 0.06 | 0.57 |
| PSIA Introverted - Revision 2007 | 5 | 0.04 | 0.92 |
| PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 5 | 0.04 | 0.94 |
| PSIA System factor - Revision 2007 | 5 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Disorders (own) | 56 | -0.03 | 0.84 |
| Observed behaviour | 13 | -0.07 | 0.81 |
| PSIA True - Revision 2007 | 5 | -0.10 | 0.84 |
| PSIA Cold - Revision 2007 | 5 | -0.16 | 0.74 |
| Educational level | 57 | -0.17 | 0.20 |
| PSIA Rational - Revision 2007 | 5 | -0.39 | 0.44 |
| PSIA Cruel - Revision 2007 | 5 | -0.62 | 0.22 |
The goal of estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for these values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.
| Below 1st quartile (134.0) | 0.52 (N = 120) |
|---|---|
| Below median (141.0) | 0.72 (N = 319) |
| Above median (141.0) | 0.34 (N = 333) |
| Above 3rd quartile (152.0) | 0.43 (N = 98) |