Statistics of Test of the Beheaded Man

© Paul Cooijmans

Scores on Test of the Beheaded Man as of 13 October 2024

Contents type: Verbal, numerical, spatial, logical.   Period: 2006-present

0 *
1 *****
2 *
4 *
5 *
6 ***
7 *
8 *
9 *
12 **
15 **
16 *
17 ***
18 **
19 **
21 ***
22 *
23 ********
24 **
25 ***
27 ****
28 ****
29.5 *
30 ****
32 ***
33 **
34 **

Correlation of Test of the Beheaded Man with other mental ability tests

Test name n r
Titan Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin)60.98
Epiq Tests (aggregate)50.96
Test For Genius - Revision 201070.95
Tests by Nikolaos Soulios (aggregate)40.94
International High IQ Society tests (aggregate)40.94
Non-Verbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve)50.93
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 (batch scored by Paul Cooijmans)40.92
Spatial Insight Test50.92
Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test230.92
Cartoons of Shock140.91
The Marathon Test190.91
Spatial section of The Marathon Test240.91
Strict Logic Spatial Exam 48 (Jonathan Wai)60.90
Strict Logic Sequences Exam II (Jonathan Wai)50.89
Numerical section of The Marathon Test240.88
Test For Genius - Revision 2016220.87
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2010100.86
Narcissus' last stand220.86
The Gate50.86
Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 2011230.85
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 2016220.85
The Hammer Of Test-Hungry - Revision 201380.84
Verbal section of The Marathon Test200.82
Test For Genius - Revision 2004140.81
Divine Psychometry (Matthew Scillitani)120.81
The Bonsai Test - Revision 2016310.80
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree190.80
Reflections In Peroxide280.79
Random Feickery (Brandon Feick)100.79
Only idiots140.79
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the first degree140.79
Associative LIMIT260.79
Space, Time, and Hyperspace - Revision 2016230.79
Labyrinthine LIMIT160.79
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3340.79
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5290.78
A Relaxing Test (David Miller)130.78
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4280.78
Dicing with death150.78
The Final Test120.78
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004190.77
The Test To End All Tests250.77
Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 2010260.76
Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test320.76
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the third degree230.76
Cooijmans On-Line Test - Two-barrelled version150.75
The Smell Test110.75
Psychometric Qrosswords160.74
Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato)80.74
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4120.74
Cooijmans Intelligence Test 5250.74
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2016220.73
The Alchemist Test (Anas El Husseini)180.73
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008290.72
Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004200.72
Tests by Ivan Ivec (aggregate)70.71
Miscellaneous tests200.70
Tests by Jason Betts (aggregate)50.70
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice70.69
Logima Strictica 24 (Robert Lato)60.69
Psychometrically Activated Grids Acerbate Neuroticism140.69
Reason - Revision 2008290.68
The Piper's Test200.68
Strict Logic Sequences Exam I (Jonathan Wai)110.68
The Sargasso Test330.67
De Laatste Test - Herziening 201960.66
The Nemesis Test270.66
The Final Test - Revision 201390.65
Laaglandse Aanlegtest - Herziening 201650.65
Letters50.65
Genius Association Test270.65
A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude240.63
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales110.62
The LAW - Letters And Words50.61
Words50.57
Test of Shock and Awe60.55
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 270.53
De Golfstroomtest - Herziening 201950.51
Reason80.50
Daedalus Test210.48
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (raw)40.42
Isis Test220.42
Numbers60.14
Cattell Culture Fair4-0.57

Weighted average of correlations: 0.748 (N = 1285)

Estimated g factor loading: 0.86

Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 4 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.

Estimated loadings of Test of the Beheaded Man on particular item types

These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.

Typeng loading of Test of the Beheaded Man on that type
Verbal2100.86
Numerical670.86
Spatial1160.89
Logical580.76
Heterogeneous5180.86

N = 969

Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.

Balanced g loading = 0.85

National medians for Test of the Beheaded Man

Country n median score
Spain332.0
Belgium328.0
Germany624.5
United_States2620.0

For reasons of privacy, only countries with 3 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the medians, and then alphabetic.

Correlation with national I.Q.'s of Test of the Beheaded Man

Correlation of this test with national average I.Q.'s published by Lynn and Vanhanen, later Lynn and Becker:

Correlation of Test of the Beheaded Man with personal details

Personalia n r
Observed associative horizon40.52
Educational level610.48
PSIA True - Revision 2007200.34
PSIA Rational - Revision 2007200.31
PSIA Orderly - Revision 2007200.23
PSIA Ethics factor - Revision 2007200.22
PSIA Introverted - Revision 2007200.16
PSIA Cold - Revision 2007200.13
PSIA System factor - Revision 2007200.09
Observed behaviour130.06
PSIA Cruel - Revision 2007200.05
Father's educational level570.02
PSIA Deviance factor - Revision 2007200.01
PSIA Extreme - Revision 200720-0.01
Sex64-0.03
PSIA Aspergoid - Revision 200720-0.05
PSIA Rare - Revision 200720-0.05
Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes16-0.05
Mother's educational level57-0.06
Year of birth64-0.14
PSIA Neurotic - Revision 200720-0.15
Disorders (own)61-0.17
PSIA Just - Revision 200720-0.25
Disorders (parents and siblings)59-0.26
PSIA Antisocial - Revision 200720-0.37
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms16-0.43

Estimated g factor loadings for restricted ranges

In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for these values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.

Below 1st quartile (raw 12.0)0.81 (410)
Below median (raw 23.0)0.82 (922)
Above median (raw 23.0)0.71 (514)
Above 3rd quartile (raw 27.5)0.48 (105)

Reliability

Error

Scores by age

Age class n Median score
65 to 69115.0
60 to 64117.0
50 to 5438.0
45 to 49525.0
40 to 44626.5
35 to 391222.0
30 to 34523.0
25 to 291423.0
22 to 24722.0
20 or 21613.5
18 or 19215.8
17112.0

N = 63

Scores by year taken

Year taken n median scoreprotonorm
2006724.0464
2007328.0520
2008122.0423
2009116.0385
2010219.5413
201118.0362
2012424.0464
2013318.0401
2014215.0379
201536.0349
2016312.0370
2017317.0390
201832.0325
2019318.0401
2020717.0390
2021525.0482
2022216.5388
2023622.0423
2024533.0650

ryear taken × median score = 0.01 (N = 64)

Robustness and overall test quality

Item analysis

Item statistics are not published as that would help candidates. To detect bad items, answers and comments from candidates are studied, as well as, for each problem, the correlation with total score on the remaining problems (item-rest correlation) and the proportion of candidates getting it wrong (hardness of the item). Possible bad items are revised, replaced, or removed, possibly resulting in a revised version of the test.