Remark: This test is no longer used in its own right but part of "Cartoons of Shock". These statistics are from the period before the test was incorporated therein.
10 | * |
12 | * |
13 | * |
14 | * |
15 | ** |
16 | * |
17 | ** |
20 | ** |
21 | ** |
22 | **** |
24 | ** |
25 | * |
26 | ** |
Test | # | cor |
---|---|---|
Cartoons of Shock | 11 | 0.92 |
Analogies #1 | 7 | 0.92 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 1 | 4 | 0.90 |
Strict Logic Sequences Exam I | 6 | 0.89 |
Test of the Beheaded Man | 4 | 0.88 |
The Nemesis Test | 5 | 0.83 |
Spatial Insight Test | 6 | 0.82 |
The Final Test | 8 | 0.82 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 | 5 | 0.78 |
Sigma Test | 4 | 0.77 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #1 | 5 | 0.72 |
The Final Test - Revision 2004 | 6 | 0.72 |
Space, Time and Hyperspace | 11 | 0.65 |
Long Test For Genius | 7 | 0.63 |
Analogies of Long Test For Genius | 8 | 0.63 |
Reason | 6 | 0.59 |
Bonsai Test | 9 | 0.54 |
Association subtest of Long Test For Genius | 7 | 0.53 |
NVCPE | 6 | 0.49 |
The Test To End All Tests | 10 | 0.48 |
KIT Intelligence Test | 4 | 0.46 |
Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 8 | 0.44 |
Logima Strictica 36 | 5 | 0.42 |
Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 9 | 0.42 |
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice | 5 | 0.42 |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 7 | 0.41 |
Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 9 | 0.41 |
Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 9 | 0.39 |
Numbers | 7 | 0.35 |
Mega Test | 5 | 0.22 |
Odds | 4 | 0.21 |
Genius Association Test | 13 | 0.19 |
Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 8 | 0.17 |
Associative LIMIT Test | 6 | 0.10 |
Titan Test | 5 | -0.25 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.531
Conservatively estimated minimum g loading: 0.73
5 | * |
10 | * |
12 | * |
13 | * |
14 | * |
15 | ** |
16 | * |
17 | ** |
20 | ** |
21 | ** |
22 | **** |
24 | ** |
25 | * |
26 | ** |
Remark: This number of candidates is a bit too low for good statistics, but that is because, after inclusion of this test in a new larger one, statistics for what was previously the Test of Shock and Awe have purposely not been collected. This policy allows revision of possible problematic test items (the new scores would not be comparable to the old scores).
(Test index) Test name | n | r |
---|---|---|
(1) Cartoons of Shock | 11 | 0.92 |
(0) Test of the Beheaded Man | 5 | 0.92 |
(85) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 1 | 4 | 0.90 |
(53) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 | 6 | 0.89 |
(77) Analogies #1 | 7 | 0.87 |
(18) The Nemesis Test | 5 | 0.83 |
(55) Spatial Insight Test | 6 | 0.82 |
(7) The Final Test | 17 | 0.79 |
(35) Intelligence Quantifier by assessment | 5 | 0.78 |
(51) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #1 | 5 | 0.72 |
(57) Space, Time, and Hyperspace | 11 | 0.65 |
(63) Long Test For Genius | 7 | 0.63 |
(75) Analogies of Long Test For Genius | 8 | 0.63 |
(82) Reason | 6 | 0.59 |
(80) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 9 | 0.57 |
(84) Bonsai Test | 9 | 0.54 |
(79) Association subtest of Long Test For Genius | 7 | 0.53 |
(28) The Test To End All Tests | 10 | 0.48 |
(83) KIT Intelligence Test - first attempts | 4 | 0.46 |
(66) Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 9 | 0.42 |
(62) Reason Behind Multiple-Choice | 5 | 0.42 |
(87) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 7 | 0.41 |
(26) Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 9 | 0.41 |
(27) Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 9 | 0.39 |
(44) Associative LIMIT | 7 | 0.37 |
(68) Numbers | 7 | 0.35 |
(10) Genius Association Test | 14 | 0.31 |
(16) Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 9 | 0.29 |
(69) Odds | 4 | 0.21 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.581
Conservatively estimated minimum g loading: 0.76
(Test index) Test name | n | r |
---|---|---|
(234) Strict Logic Sequences Exam I | 6 | 0.89 |
(242) Unknown tests | 7 | 0.79 |
(235) Nonverbal Cognitive Performance Examination | 6 | 0.77 |
(237) Sigma Test | 4 | 0.77 |
(225) Logima Strictica 36 | 6 | 0.37 |
(229) Mega Test | 5 | 0.22 |
(239) Titan Test | 6 | -0.05 |
(231) Mysterium Entrance Exam | 4 | -0.57 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.439
Please be aware that correlations with these external tests are in most cases affected (depressed, typically) by one or more of the following: (1) Little overlap with the object test because of the much lower ceilings and inherent ceiling effects of the tests used in regular psychology; (2) Candidates reporting scores selectively, for instance only the higher ones while withholding lower ones; (3) Candidates reporting, or having been reported by psychometricians, incorrect scores.
These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.
Type | g loading of Test of Shock and Awe on that type |
---|---|
Verbal | 0.77 |
Numerical | 0.54 |
Spatial | 0.72 |
Logical | 0.77 |
Heterogeneous | 0.86 |
Balanced g loading = 0.73
Country | n | median score |
---|---|---|
United_Kingdom | 2 | 20.5 |
Finland | 4 | 18.0 |
United_States | 7 | 17.0 |
Personalia | n | r |
---|---|---|
Observed associative horizon | 3 | 0.82 |
Educational level | 18 | 0.66 |
P.S.I.A. Cold | 9 | 0.47 |
P.S.I.A. Orderly | 9 | 0.29 |
P.S.I.A. System factor | 9 | 0.28 |
P.S.I.A. Cruel | 9 | 0.24 |
Father's educational level | 16 | 0.15 |
Sex | 23 | 0.09 |
Disorders (own) | 19 | 0.07 |
Observed behaviour | 7 | 0.06 |
P.S.I.A. Ethics factor | 14 | 0.04 |
P.S.I.A. Neurotic | 9 | -0.06 |
Mother's educational level | 16 | -0.21 |
P.S.I.A. Aspergoid | 9 | -0.22 |
P.S.I.A. Introverted | 9 | -0.22 |
P.S.I.A. Rational | 9 | -0.27 |
P.S.I.A. True | 9 | -0.27 |
P.S.I.A. Deviance factor | 14 | -0.27 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 18 | -0.28 |
P.S.I.A. Rare | 9 | -0.29 |
Year of birth | 23 | -0.39 |
P.S.I.A. Antisocial | 9 | -0.40 |
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 9 | -0.51 |
P.S.I.A. Extreme | 9 | -0.66 |
P.S.I.A. Just | 9 | -0.91 |
Correlation of this test with national average I.Q.'s published by Lynn and Vanhanen:
In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for both values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.
Raw score | Upward g (n) | Downward g (n) |
---|---|---|
0 | 0.76 (222) | NaN (0) |
16.5 | 0.56 (137) | -0.37 (29) |
20 | 0.50 (111) | 0.65 (84) |
23.5 | 0.80 (9) | 0.74 (162) |
33 | NaN (0) | 0.76 (222) |
Age class | n | median score |
---|---|---|
50 to 54 | 3 | 16.0 |
45 to 49 | 3 | 22.0 |
40 to 44 | 4 | 21.0 |
35 to 39 | 4 | 23.0 |
30 to 34 | 1 | 17.0 |
25 to 29 | 4 | 17.5 |
22 to 24 | 1 | 14.0 |
17 | 1 | 15.0 |
16 | 1 | 17.0 |
14 | 1 | 10.0 |
Year taken | n | median score |
---|---|---|
2003 | 7 | 21.0 |
2004 | 8 | 18.0 |
2005 | 6 | 20.5 |
2008 | 1 | 24.0 |
2012 | 1 | 5.0 |
ryear taken × median score = -0.71 (n = 23)
Item statistics are not published as that would help future candidates. To detect bad items, answers and comments from candidates are studied, as well as, for each problem, the correlation with total score and the proportion of candidates getting it wrong (hardness of the item). Possible bad items are removed or revised, resulting in a revised version of the test.