These are statistics based on the scores on Epiq's tests (aggregate) as reported by test candidates of I.Q. Tests for the High Range.
131 | * |
139 | * |
140 | * |
141 | * |
142 | * |
143 | *** |
144 | *** |
145 | ***** |
146 | * |
147 | ** |
148 | * |
149 | ** |
150 | *** |
153 | * |
155 | * |
156 | * |
(Test index) Test name | n | r |
---|---|---|
(3) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #5 | 4 | 0.98 |
(66) Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 7 | 0.95 |
(263) Tests by Paul Laurent Miranda (aggregate) | 6 | 0.95 |
(7) The Final Test | 4 | 0.92 |
(63) Long Test For Genius | 4 | 0.92 |
(216) Tests by Ivan Ivec (aggregate) | 4 | 0.92 |
(236) International High IQ Society tests (aggregate) | 5 | 0.91 |
(40) Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008 | 4 | 0.91 |
(235) Nonverbal Cognitive Performance Examination (Xavier Jouve) | 12 | 0.90 |
(27) Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 8 | 0.90 |
(239) Titan Test (Ronald K. Hoeflin) | 6 | 0.85 |
(16) Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 4 | 0.83 |
(226) Logima Strictica 24 (Robert Lato) | 6 | 0.83 |
(24) Reason - Revision 2008 | 4 | 0.83 |
(240) Strict Logic Spatial Exam 48 (Jonathan Wai) | 7 | 0.79 |
(75) Analogies of Long Test For Genius | 5 | 0.75 |
(231) Tests by Greg Grove (aggregate) | 8 | 0.70 |
(57) Space, Time, and Hyperspace | 5 | 0.69 |
(237) Sigma Test (Hindemburg) | 4 | 0.69 |
(234) Strict Logic Sequences Exam I (Jonathan Wai) | 14 | 0.68 |
(10) Genius Association Test | 8 | 0.66 |
(87) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 5 | 0.62 |
(26) Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 7 | 0.53 |
(225) Logima Strictica 36 (Robert Lato) | 14 | 0.50 |
(79) Association subtest of Long Test For Genius | 5 | 0.46 |
(223) Strict Logic Sequences Exam II (Jonathan Wai) | 6 | 0.45 |
(242) Unknown and miscellaneous tests | 14 | 0.37 |
(224) Test of Inductive Reasoning / J.C.T.I. (Xavier Jouve) | 9 | 0.29 |
(218) Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.) | 5 | 0.26 |
(80) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 5 | 0.25 |
(11) Isis Test | 6 | 0.13 |
(53) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 | 6 | 0.06 |
(246) Sequentia Numerica Form I (Alexander Herkner) | 5 | -0.18 |
(211) Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version (Etienne Forsström) | 10 | -0.41 |
(68) Numbers | 5 | -0.93 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.549 (N = 231, weighted sum = 126.72)
Conservatively estimated minimum g loading: 0.74
Too little data.
Country | n | median score |
---|---|---|
United_States | 6 | 145.5 |
Sweden | 3 | 145.0 |
Germany | 3 | 143.0 |
Spain | 2 | 142.0 |
Correlation of this test with national average I.Q.'s published by Lynn and Vanhanen:
Personalia | n | r |
---|---|---|
P.S.I.A. Antisocial - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.99 |
P.S.I.A. Cruel - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.93 |
P.S.I.A. Neurotic - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.65 |
P.S.I.A. Introverted - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.62 |
P.S.I.A. Orderly - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.54 |
P.S.I.A. System factor - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.47 |
P.S.I.A. Rare - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.41 |
Father's educational level | 24 | 0.26 |
P.S.I.A. Just - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.25 |
Mother's educational level | 25 | 0.23 |
Educational level | 25 | 0.19 |
P.S.I.A. Cold - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.15 |
P.S.I.A. Aspergoid - Revision 2007 | 4 | 0.01 |
P.S.I.A. True - Revision 2007 | 4 | -0.03 |
P.S.I.A. Deviance factor - Revision 2007 | 4 | -0.20 |
Disorders (own) | 26 | -0.20 |
Year of birth | 28 | -0.21 |
Disorders (parents and siblings) | 25 | -0.23 |
Sex | 28 | -0.24 |
Observed behaviour | 6 | -0.30 |
Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes | 4 | -0.37 |
P.S.I.A. Ethics factor - Revision 2007 | 4 | -0.56 |
P.S.I.A. Extreme - Revision 2007 | 4 | -0.69 |
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 4 | -0.91 |
P.S.I.A. Rational - Revision 2007 | 4 | -0.94 |
In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for both values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.
Raw score | Upward g (N) | Downward g (N) |
---|---|---|
131 | 0.74 (231) | NaN (0) |
142 | 0.62 (187) | NaN (0) |
145 | 0.49 (90) | 0.68 (83) |
148 | 0.35 (27) | 0.61 (139) |
156 | NaN (0) | 0.74 (231) |