This report contains information on the very highest test scores having occurred in the 28-year period from 1995 to present. The threshold for inclusion is I.Q. 170, which corresponds to protonorm 618 according to the current norms. The I.Q. range 170-179 is tentatively called "pervasive intelligence". Considered are only scores on tests containing at least two different item types, when items are classified by their appearance as either verbal, numerical, spatial, or logical. Such heterogeneous tests have proven to be more robust, valid, and reliable than are homogeneous tests (with only one item type).
For information, I.Q. 170 is reached or exceeded by 2.49 % of high-range candidates, and actually by 2.65 % of male high-range candidates and .6 % of female high-range candidates, according to the most recent norming of the protonorm table. For better understanding of these numbers one should consider that there are about 4 to 5 times more male than female high-range candidates, and that males take more tests per person, such that there are 11 times more male than female scores occurring. If the numbers in this report do not seem to exactly match this information, this is because this report is more recent than that information.
There are 71 scores in this range, following above criteria. Their exact distribution, the norming of tests in this range, and the question whether higher scores within this range also mean greater ability, are not topics of this report. Those matters are dealt with, when possible, in the statistical reports for the tests in question, and in the report on the norming of protonorms to norms. When norms change, the number of scores that fall at or above I.Q. 170 may naturally change. Considering the rareness of these scores, it should best be assumed that the current norms within this range are not good enough to distinguish well between the corresponding performances, and that this may improve with future renormings.
The 71 scores have been obtained by 35 candidates:
# scores per candidate | # candidates with that number of scores |
---|---|
8 | * |
6 | * |
4 | *** |
3 | ** |
2 | ********** * |
1 | ********** ******* |
Sex | # scores |
---|---|
Female | 2 |
Male | 69 |
For the first time, it is now possible to estimate the male/female ratio at or above I.Q. 170 (about 34). While 2 female scores may seem too little for significance, the fact that it took 28 years for these scores to occur while nothing was keeping females from taking the tests greatly adds to the statistical power of this number. For comparison, here are the male/female ratios that have been observed at certain thresholds over the decades:
I.Q. threshold | male/female ratio |
---|---|
100 | ≈ 1 |
131 | ≈ 2 |
146.35 | 15 |
170 | 34 |
Country | # scores |
---|---|
United States | ********** ********** ** |
Spain | ********** ** |
Belgium | ***** |
Germany | ***** |
United Kingdom | ***** |
Latvia | **** |
Finland | *** |
China | ** |
The Netherlands | ** |
Romania | ** |
Austria | * |
Bulgaria | * |
Hungary | * |
India | * |
Japan | * |
Korea, South | * |
New Zealand | * |
Norway | * |
Unknown | * |
Age class | # scores |
---|---|
65-69 | ** |
60-64 | * |
55-59 | ***** |
50-54 | ****** |
45-49 | **** |
40-44 | ********** ****** |
35-39 | ********** ** |
30-34 | ********** ** |
25-29 | ******* |
20-24 | ****** |
Birth year | # scores |
---|---|
1955-59 | ** |
1960-64 | ********** |
1965-69 | ********** *** |
1970-74 | ****** |
1975-79 | ********** **** |
1980-84 | ****** |
1985-89 | ********** * |
1990-95 | ********* |
Test | # scores |
---|---|
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 3 | ***** |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 1 | **** |
Reflections In Peroxide | **** |
Problems In Gentle Slopes of the second degree | **** |
Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 2008 | **** |
Narcissus' last stand | **** |
The Bonsai Test - Revision 2016 | **** |
Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | *** |
The Nemesis Test | *** |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 4 | *** |
Isis Test | *** |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test 5 | *** |
The Sargasso Test | *** |
The Alchemist Test | *** |
Long Test For Genius | ** |
Numerical and Spatial sections of The Marathon Test | ** |
The Marathon Test | ** |
Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | ** |
Dicing with death | ** |
Divine Psychometry | ** |
Short Test For Genius | * |
Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | * |
Grail Test | * |
Test of the Beheaded Man | * |
Cooijmans On-Line Test - Two-barrelled version | * |
Combined Numerical and Spatial sections Test For Genius - Revision 2016 | * |
The Piper's Test | * |
A Relaxing Test | * |
A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude | * |
Year | # scores |
---|---|
2022 | ********** ****** |
2021 | ********** |
2020 | ********** * |
2019 | **** |
2018 | * |
2017 | ** |
2016 | * |
2015 | * |
2014 | * |
2013 | * |
2012 | ** |
2011 | |
2010 | ***** |
2009 | ** |
2008 | ** |
2007 | *** |
2006 | |
2005 | |
2004 | ** |
2003 | * |
2002 | ** |
2001 | * |
2000 | |
1999 | ** |
1998 | * |
1997 | |
1996 | |
1995 |
So, there has been an explosive outbreak of scores at or above I.Q. 170 since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Level | # scores |
---|---|
A few years secondary school | ** |
Secondary school completed | ********** ********** * |
Bachelor | ********** ********* |
Master | ********** ******* |
Doctor | ********** |
Unknown | ** |
A total of 22 out of the 71 scores are from candidates who report having a psychiatric disorder. 2 of those 22 scores belong to someone who has committed suicide. 11 of those 22 scores are from candidates who have been observed displaying disordered behaviour.
The majority of scores therefore are from candidates with no reported disorders, and with no observed disordered behaviour.
Remarkable in a majority of these candidates is the absence of negativity and rudeness, and the, on the whole, positive, polite, constructive attitude.
Regarding potentially interesting matters like political leanings, such information is only available for a minority of these candidates so that it is not meaningful to provide a summary of it.