Statistics of Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes

© March 2018 Paul Cooijmans

Norms

Rawt-scoreComment
035The opposite of a cultural Marxist;
probably a racist, fascist, or nazi
136
236
337
438
538
639
739
840Clearly not a cultural Marxist
940
1041
1142
1242
1343
1444
1544
1645Apparently not a true cultural Marxist
1746
1846
1947
2048
2148
2249
2350
2450Some neo-Marxist attitudes, but not the whole spectrum
2551
2651
2752
2853
2953
3054
3154
3255Clearly a cultural Marxist
3355
3456
3557
3657
3758
3859
3959
4060
4160
4261
4362
4462
4563
4664
4764
4865Most definitely a cultural Marxist
4965
5066
5166
5267
5368
5468
5569
5670
5771
5871
5972
6072
6173
6274
6374
6475An example to us all
6575
6676
6777
6877
6978
7079
7179
7280Probably one of the idols of cultural Marxism
7381
7481
7582
7683
7783
7884
7985
8085

These norms are based on a slightly corrected raw score mean and standard deviation.

Scores on Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes

Contents type: Personality test other than for mental ability.   Period: 2012-present

0 **
0.5 *
1 **
2 ***
2.5 **
3.5 **
4 **
4.5 ****
5.5 *
7 *
7.5 **
8 ***
8.5 **
9.5 *
10 **
10.5 **
11 *
11.5 *****
12 *
12.5 ***
13 ***
13.5 *
14 *
14.5 *
15 **
16 *
16.5 *
17 **
18 **
18.5 *
19 *
19.5 **
20 *
21 *
23 **
24 **
24.5 ***
25 *
25.5 *
27 *
27.5 *
28 **
29 *
30.5 *
31 ***
32.5 *
33.5 *
34 *
34.5 **
35 *
35.5 *
37 *
37.5 *
38.5 *****
39.5 *
40 *
40.5 ****
41 *
41.5 *
42 *
42.5 *
44.5 **
45 **
45.5 **
47 **
48.5 *
49.5 *
51 *
52.5 **
55 *
59 *
69.5 *

The fact that the female median is so much higher than the male median (about 1.33 standard deviations higher) is one of the remarkable features of this test. The difference is statistically significant, and in fact the female scores are situated almost entirely in the upper half of the score distribution.

Scores by males

n = 107

0 **
0.5 *
1 **
2 ***
2.5 **
3.5 **
4 **
4.5 ****
7 *
7.5 **
8 ***
8.5 **
9.5 *
10 **
10.5 *
11 *
11.5 *****
12 *
12.5 ***
13 ***
13.5 *
14 *
14.5 *
15 **
16 *
16.5 *
17 **
18 **
18.5 *
19 *
19.5 **
20 *
21 *
23 **
24 *
24.5 ***
25 *
25.5 *
27 *
27.5 *
28 *
29 *
30.5 *
31 **
32.5 *
33.5 *
34 *
34.5 *
35 *
35.5 *
37 *
37.5 *
38.5 *****
40 *
40.5 ***
41 *
41.5 *
42 *
42.5 *
44.5 *
45 **
45.5 *
47 *
48.5 *
52.5 **
55 *
59 *
69.5 *

Scores by females

n = 11

5.5 *
24 *
28 *
31 *
34.5 *
39.5 *
40.5 *
44.5 *
47 *
49.5 *
51 *

Correlation of Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes with other tests by Paul Cooijmans

(Test index) Test name n r
(4) A Paranoiac's Torture: Intelligence Test Utilizing Diabolic Exactitude21.00
(29) Words21.00
(36) Reflections In Peroxide21.00
(41) The LAW - Letters And Words21.00
(45) Numerical and spatial sections of The Marathon Test31.00
(7) The Final Test31.00
(32) Spatial section of The Marathon Test31.00
(25) The Sargasso Test40.83
(87) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 250.78
(57) Space, Time, and Hyperspace30.70
(0) Test of the Beheaded Man80.62
(24) Reason - Revision 200880.53
(53) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #350.49
(31) Numerical section of The Marathon Test30.48
(40) Reason Behind Multiple-Choice - Revision 200880.46
(23) Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test - Revision 201180.38
(80) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #490.33
(12) Cooijmans On-Line Test - Two-barrelled version30.31
(16) Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test70.28
(3) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #580.23
(19) Numerical section of Test For Genius - Revision 201040.18
(26) Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 200450.18
(44) Associative LIMIT60.11
(43) Test For Genius - Revision 20104-0.11
(106) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 43-0.16
(10) Genius Association Test8-0.25
(2) Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 39-0.26
(68) Numbers3-0.40
(35) Intelligence Quantifier by assessment10-0.44
(39) Combined Numerical and Spatial sections of Test For Genius - Revision 20104-0.52
(27) Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 20046-0.84
(11) Isis Test4-0.85
(66) Test For Genius - Revision 20043-0.91
(82) Reason3-0.92
(62) Reason Behind Multiple-Choice3-0.95
(1) Cartoons of Shock3-0.97
(8) Female Intelligence Test2-1.00
(15) Letters2-1.00
(18) The Nemesis Test2-1.00
(28) The Test To End All Tests2-1.00
(33) Problems In Gentle Slopes of the first degree2-1.00
(48) Narcissus' last stand2-1.00
(50) Qoymans Automatic Test #22-1.00
(51) Qoymans Multiple-Choice #12-1.00
(63) Long Test For Genius2-1.00
(72) Qoymans Automatic Test #12-1.00
(75) Analogies of Long Test For Genius2-1.00
(79) Association subtest of Long Test For Genius2-1.00

Weighted average of correlations: -0.003

Conservatively estimated minimum g loading: -0.06

Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 2 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.

Notice that on the whole there is no significant correlation with I.Q. scores.

Correlation of Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes with tests by others

(Test index) Test name n r
(203) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales for Children21.00
(206) W-8721.00
(229) Mega Test21.00
(239) Titan Test21.00
(236) International High IQ Society Miscellaneous tests40.78
(238) 916 Test40.46
(242) Unknown and miscellaneous tests190.32
(225) Logima Strictica 3680.12
(240) Strict Logic Spatial Exam 4830.05
(231) Mysterium Entrance Exam5-0.10
(234) Strict Logic Sequences Exam I4-0.29
(218) Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (I.Q.)3-0.46
(226) Logima Strictica 244-0.73
(248) Gliaweb Riddled Intelligence Test (old version)5-0.77
(211) Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version5-0.88
(201) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales2-1.00
(224) T.R.I.2-1.00
(243) Scholastic Aptitude Test (old)2-1.00

Weighted average of correlations: -0.002

Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 2 score pairs. All known pairs are used, including possible floor/ceiling scores or outliers.

Please be aware that correlations with these external tests are in most cases affected (depressed, typically) by one or more of the following: (1) Little overlap with the object test because of the much lower ceilings and inherent ceiling effects of the tests used in regular psychology; (2) Candidates reporting scores selectively, for instance only the higher ones while withholding lower ones; (3) Candidates reporting, or having been reported by psychometricians, incorrect scores.

Estimated loadings of Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes on particular item types

These are estimated g factor loadings, but against homogeneous tests (containing only particular item types) as opposed to non-compound heterogeneous tests. Although tending to surprise the lay person, it is not uncommon for tests to have high loadings on item types they do not actually contain themselves. Such loadings reflect the empirical fact that most tests for mental abilities measure primarily g, regardless of their contents; that the major part of test score variance is caused by g, and only a minor part by factors germane to particular item types. It is of key importance to understand that this is a fact of nature, a natural phenomenon, and not something that was built into the tests by the test constructors.

Typeg loading of Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes on that type
Verbal0.24
Numerical0.31
Spatial0.33
Logical0.37
Heterogeneous0.13

Compound tests have been left out of this table to avoid overlap.

Balanced g loading = 0.27

National medians for Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes

Country n median score
Netherlands934.0
Germany630.8
Belgium228.3
Denmark518.0
United_States2418.0
Finland415.5
United_Kingdom213.5
Sweden411.3
Spain210.8
Australia27.3
Canada25.5

For reasons of privacy, only countries with 2 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the medians, and then alphabetic.

Correlation with national I.Q.'s of Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes

Correlation of this test with national average I.Q.'s published by Lynn and Vanhanen:

Correlation of Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes with personal details

Personalia n r
P.S.I.A. Cruel230.38
Candidate's self-estimated I.Q.110.33
Educational level370.20
P.S.I.A. Neurotic230.13
Father's educational level330.07
Mother's educational level350.05
Year of birth1120.02
Disorders (parents and siblings)35-0.03
P.S.I.A. Rare23-0.04
P.S.I.A. Antisocial23-0.07
Disorders (own)36-0.08
Observed associative horizon8-0.11
Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms24-0.15
P.S.I.A. Aspergoid23-0.18
P.S.I.A. Extreme23-0.23
Sex118-0.25
P.S.I.A. True23-0.27
P.S.I.A. Deviance factor24-0.28
P.S.I.A. Orderly23-0.28
P.S.I.A. Introverted23-0.29
P.S.I.A. Cold23-0.39
P.S.I.A. Ethics factor24-0.42
P.S.I.A. System factor18-0.55
P.S.I.A. Rational23-0.56
Observed behaviour10-0.67
P.S.I.A. Just23-0.69

P.S.I.A. Just, Rational, System, and Ethics are the main negative correlates of neo-Marxist attitudes, while there are no significant positive correlates in this table.

Estimated g factor loadings upward and downward of particular scores

In parentheses the number of score pairs on which that estimated g factor loading is based. The goal of this is to verify the hypothesis that g becomes less important, accounts for a smaller proportion of the variance, at higher I.Q. levels. The mere fact of restricting the range like this also depresses the g loading compared to computing it over the test's full range, so it would be normal for both values to be lower than the test's full-range g loading.

Raw scoreUpward g (n)Downward g (n)
0-0.06 (198)NaN (0)
5.7-0.22 (73)0.10 (80)
19.8-0.18 (39)0.35 (124)
33.9-0.11 (5)0.14 (172)
80NaN (0)-0.06 (198)

Reliability

These are stunningly high reliabilities for a non-cognitive personality test, and in fact even higher than those of most I.Q. tests. They imply that the attitudes collected in the CINEMA are indeed a strongly correlating whole.

Error

Scores by age

Age class n median score
60 to 64312.5
55 to 59445.8
50 to 54413.3
45 to 491011.3
40 to 441325.0
35 to 391529.0
30 to 341417.3
25 to 291518.0
22 to 241415.0
20 or 21334.0
18 or 19930.5
15133.5

Scores by age - within females

Age class n median score
60 to 6415.5
55 to 59245.8
45 to 49124.0
40 to 44236.8
35 to 39149.5
30 to 34131.0
22 to 24151.0

Scores by age - within males

Age class n median score
60 to 64213.5
55 to 59240.5
50 to 54413.3
45 to 49911.0
40 to 441124.5
35 to 391426.8
30 to 341315.0
25 to 291417.3
22 to 241313.0
20 or 21334.0
18 or 19930.5
15133.5

Scores by year taken

Year taken n median score
20123820.3
20131924.5
20141138.5
2015923.0
2016724.5
20172212.3
2018535.5

ryear taken × median score = 0.06 (n = 111)

Robustness and overall test quality

Item analysis

q should be understood as the proportion of candidates not agreeing with that item (wherein "neutral" is considered as being halfway between agreeing and not agreeing), and r is the item's correlation with total score.

The fact that all of the items have positive correlations, and that in almost all cases those are significant and sizeable, means that the attitudes contained in this inventory form a strongly correlating whole and a genuine behavioural dimension.

Item #Hardness (q)r
10.480.57
20.550.70
30.450.39
40.410.52
50.540.63
60.620.74
70.590.60
80.560.50
90.500.47
100.690.65
110.660.28
120.690.66
130.820.30
140.480.72
150.640.72
160.770.69
170.710.54
180.780.63
190.600.67
200.750.48
210.670.25
220.560.58
230.810.62
240.550.71
250.820.62
260.750.72
270.760.62
280.610.62
290.640.59
300.620.43
310.630.76
320.590.30
330.810.26
340.820.60
350.640.61
360.840.63
370.720.75
380.750.73
390.320.44
400.720.55
410.630.71
420.760.59
430.780.64
440.800.63
450.570.31
460.590.79
470.570.65
480.820.52
490.720.55
500.720.66
510.760.65
520.500.67
530.820.47
540.870.51
550.530.41
560.640.63
570.580.64
580.860.39
590.920.36
600.920.38
610.850.45
620.840.45
630.700.74
640.700.57
650.970.34
660.660.69
670.530.56
680.940.53
690.680.49
700.920.38
710.920.45
720.960.24
730.910.35
740.890.45
750.910.25
760.860.58
770.820.51
780.730.29
790.920.15
800.880.30

The conclusions

  1. Females score much higher than males on neo-Marxist attitudes;
  2. The inventory has very high reliability and very small error of measurement, and measures a genuine behavioural dimension;
  3. P.S.I.A. Just, Rational, System, and Ethics correlate negatively with neo-Marxist attitudes;
  4. There is no significant correlation with I.Q. scores.